« May 2005 | Main | July 2005 »

Payton Needs a Home

June 30, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

payton.jpg

Payton

This is Payton. And he needs a home. He needs parents.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, there are about 118,000 children in the foster care system who are waiting to be adopted.

Payton is one of them.

Most of these kids are classified "special-needs." They might have a physical disability, or be developmentally delayed, or have suffered abuse. They might be perfectly healthy, but be a minority. Or they might be trying to be adopted as a sibling group.

This post is the first in a new weekly series,"Adopt This Child," on Reasoned Audacity. Each week, I'll highlight a child who is available for adoption from the searchable photolisting database posted by the federal Children's Bureau at AdoptUSKids.org.

The photolisting gives information about Payton:

Payton is a cute, African American boy with black hair and brown eyes born in 1991. He is described as being quiet until he gets to know you. He likes competition when playing in a group. Payton enjoys drawing, playing football, kickball and is learning to play the guitar.

Payton has been diagnosed with ADHD and receives medication. He can be aggressive and have tantrums when he doesn't get his own way. Other times he appears to be sullen.

Payton is behind in school and is not working at his full potential. He needs lots of encouragement to complete his homework.

Payton has had a number of losses in his life and is in need of a patient and understanding family that is able to set clear boundaries and expectations for behavior. Strong parenting skills would be a bonus. He's a wonderful little boy, full of potential, if given the chance to thrive.

The Children's Bureau also provides information on how to pursue adoption. I believe there is a home where Payton can have that chance to thrive. I believe there are homes out there for all of the children who are waiting for parents to love them and believe in them.

The blogosphere can help by getting the word out: Payton needs a home.

###

Thank you for Outside The Beltway and the Traffic Jam for taking on us hitch hikers.


ABC Cancels "Welcome to the Neighborhood"

| By Charmaine Yoest

The ABC Network cancelled the "Welcome To The Neighborhood" series, the latest entrant in Reality TV. Good thing. The pogrom program should have been titled, "Meet the Caricatures."

Your Audacious (yet so Reasonable) blogger had a conversation with the AP reporter, David Bauder, about controversy surrounding this program last week.

welcome_to_neighborhood_abc.jpg

Caricatures on Parade

Now they've cancelled the show!

The show featured seven families competing for a rather nice house in a cul-de-sac of $350K shacks in Austin. The Texas capital motto is "Keep Austin Weird," but even this city had limits. To win the candidate family had to be accepted by the current families living in the neigborhood. Losers would be brutally voted off the premises each week.

Will the violence never cease?

The show had something to offend everyone . . . featuring a homosexual couple; a black couple; a Hispanic couple (with lots of kids); an Asian couple (who owned a restaurant); a white couple (country-comes-to-town); a devil-worshiping witch (kid you not); and a couple with tattoos. ABC already has all their pictures scrubbed off their website.

Conveniently, the Bible-thumping Jesus freaks were there to pass judgement on everyone. Can anyone say "set up for failure?" I suggested to the AP that this was a lose-lose for everyone.

###

Comments on Reality TV Magazine -- yes, there's a blog for this genre -- were surprisingly perceptive and generally supportive for the series.

Shakespeare's Sister didn't care for the Neighborhood either.

Our friends at Pam's House Blend illustrate how the show's premise managed to offend everyone. Pam (tagline: "American. Female. Lesbian. Opinionated.") thought that "watching the bigotry [would be] almost too painful to take" and predicted the Korean's or the Tattoo's would "win."

See more analysis at Daily Pepper contrasting ABC with PBS

And a thank you to Open Post at Mudville Gazette for preserving, protecting and defending our way of life(!).


David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch Debate Gay Marriage

June 29, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest
blankenhorn.jpg
David Blankenhorn and Jonathan Rauch

Last night at the Independent Women's Forum, David Blankenhorn, President of the Institute for American Values, and Jonathan Rauch, author of Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America debated the issue of gay marriage.

Perhaps one of the more interesting elements of the evening was that I thought Jonathan Rauch made one really important point. He said that as he has been giving speeches about his book, he was surprised when he "found myself having to sell marriage to straight people."

Sigh. Sad, but true.


Continue Reading »

Bush: War Without Angst

| By Charmaine Yoest

Bush has a hard sell on his hands: War without Angst. The President is on the difficult ground of FUD politics.

potus_ftbragg.jpg

Speech at Ft. Bragg

In his speech last night from Fort Bragg, the President was the confident cowboy leading us as The War Time President. As it should be; as it must be.

Nevertheless, Bush is using a sales tactic that works with products . . . but is much more difficult with politics. IBM trained a generation of sales reps to eliminate FUD's: "fear, uncertainty and doubt." In the private sector, in business, this communication works.

Less so in the public sector. Selling war in America requires Angst, Worry, Concern, Reluctance, Victimhood.

As Victor Davis Hanson reminds us in his outstanding article The Politics of American War, there's a huge gulf between the politics of war for liberal and conservative presidents:

clinton_lip.jpg

To end the dictatorial and genocidal plans of Slobodan Milosevic, liberal Bill Clinton was willing to bomb downtown Belgrade, commit American forces to a major campaign without U.S. Senate approval and bypass the United Nations altogether. Few accused him of fighting an illegal war, contravening U.N. protocols, or cowardly dropping bombs on civilians. In all these cases, public opposition was pretty much muted, despite the horrendous casualties involved in some of these past conflicts.

George W. Bush, as a conservative President, however, will never be given such leeway. Why not? Because he doesn't bite his lip:

. . .it is very difficult in general for a conservative to wage war, because the natural suspicion arises that his tragic view of human nature and his belief in the occasional utility of force, makes him seem to enjoy the enterprise far more than a lip-biting progressive, who may in fact order far more destruction.

So that's what the President was up against last night. He is a President, who is, apparently, uniquely suited by temperament for eliminating FUD and waging a War Without Angst. Many of us think resolute words like these from his speech last night are his great strength:

. . .we fight today because terrorists want to attack our country and kill our citizens, and Iraq is where they are making their stand. So we'll fight them there, we'll fight them across the world, and we will stay in the fight until the fight is won. (Applause.)

America has done difficult work before. From our desperate fight for independence to the darkest days of a Civil War, to the hard-fought battles against tyranny in the 20th century, there were many chances to lose our heart, our nerve, or our way. But Americans have always held firm, because we have always believed in certain truths. We know that if evil is not confronted, it gains in strength and audacity, and returns to strike us again. We know that when the work is hard, the proper response is not retreat, it is courage. And we know that this great ideal of human freedom entrusted to us in a special way, and that the ideal of liberty is worth defending.

Audacity. Emphasis mine.

The proper response when confronting an enemy's audacity is not retreat. And I, for one, am glad he didn't bite his lip as he stated that human freedom is entrusted to us in a special way.

We must meet audacity with audacity. But ours is a Reasoned Audacity.
###

Read fearless patriots on Open Post at Mudville Gazette.

Outside The Beltway always knows what's up in Your Nation's Capital at Traffic Jam

Thank you to the lovely ladies BlogWhoring over Shakespeare's Sister

e-Claire has a terrific overview of The Speech.


Support for Susan Torres, Fundraiser at Chevy's

June 28, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Susan_Torres_100.jpg

Do you live in the DC area? Or, even if you don't, c'mon over anyway. . .

Tomorrow, (Wednesday the 29th) Chevy's Restaurant in Falls Church is hosting a fundraiser for Susan Torres and her baby. Susan is the young pregnant woman who collapsed last month from a cancerous tumor at the base of her brain. She is now brain dead, but doctors at Virginia Hospital Center are trying to keep her body functioning long enough for her baby to reach viability -- they hope to make it to mid-July.

Surprisingly, the Washington Post is following the story closely and yesterday published an update, "Weary Father Left To Count the Days." The sad headline nearly says it all . . . all except that the baby continues to grow, and on Thursday, the family saw it kicking on a sonogram.

chevys_logo.gif

Susan's husband, Jason, and their two-year-old son, Peter, do need help. Keep them in your prayers, and, if you can, come to Chevy's on Wednesday. The fundraising event is organized by Preemies Today and 20% of your bill will go to the Susan Torres Fund, if you mention either Susan Torres or Preemies Today any time between 3 o'clock and closing.

More information about helping the Torres family, is available here.


The Cotillion Ball is in Full Swing . . .

| By Charmaine Yoest

southernbelle1.jpg

. . . be sure to dance on over!

Thanks to this week's hostesses, Sondra K at Knowledge is Power; Stacy, who is Not a Desperate Housewife; Maxed Out Mama; and Rightwingsparkle, a former Democrat feminist Baptist, who is now a Republican pro-life Catholic.


Miss Attila on Abortion

| By Charmaine Yoest

attila.jpg

Be sure to read "Adoption and the Single Girl" over at Little Miss Attila's. It's a really brave piece that she has written about the adoption she and her husband are pursuing today. . . and the abortion she had when she was twenty:

I'm involved in an "infertility and adoption" group through my church, and I was talking to a guy about my regrets that I had had an abortion at the age of 20. Of course, it turns out he's going through the same thing: one of his girlfriends had an abortion when he was in college. It's especially painful for those of us who desperately want kids to contemplate the fact that we could have produced them at one time, but destroyed them instead.

She then goes on:

I've been berating myself for over 20 years for not standing up to this guy and having the baby. . . And the knee-jerk rush toward abortion as the only solution to the problem of unplanned pregnancies is a tragedy for men and women.

And that's why I am pro-life.

It's a must read -- thanks for having the courage to write it, Attila.


Ronald Reagan Wins: Greatest American

June 27, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

It's nice to be pleasantly surprised for a change. The Discovery Channel has chosen Ronald Reagan as its "Greatest American." I blogged earlier about my skepticism about a list that included Michael Moore and Madonna. But the final list is not so bad.

ronald_reagan_with_charmaine_smaller.jpg

I could hardly breathe!

I have a few quibbles: Bill Clinton, Elvis Presley and Oprah Winfrey win numbers 7, 8 and 9 respectively -- but it could have been worse. And it's good to see W. winning number 6, though I'd argue he is head and shoulders above Bill Clinton. An impeached President doesn't belong on the list at all.

Obviously, I'm happy about the top choice. Forgive me for including this picture, but this was a big moment for a young girl. I worked in the Reagan White House as both a college intern, and as my first job out of college. This picture was taken on a day when our whole department, Presidential Personnel, headed by Bob Tuttle (just-named Ambassador to England), got to meet the President.

I remember standing in the hallway outside the Oval Office barely able to breathe. Actually standing in the office, next to the great man was awe-inspiring. However, as many have noted, Ronald Reagan was unfailingly gracious. And he set us all at ease by standing around and telling jokes after the individual pictures were finished.

One wonders: are there any Clinton-era female interns, or young female staffers, who are still proud to be pictured in the same frame with Bill Clinton?

One gets the impression from the story of the Lewinsky scandals that people within the White House have easy access to the President. Not true. Even within the gates, the President doesn't just stroll around. Everywhere he moves, Secret Service men surround him. In the Reagan White House, if POTUS was on the move in the Old Executive Office Building, a buzz would start, and people would come out of their offices to line the hallways and applaud him.

One of my favorite memories is from a time when I almost got in trouble with the Secret Service. I was working on a weekend, and had to get some document to someone quickly, so I flew down the stairs of the West Wing . . . as I rounded a corner, President Reagan stepped into the stairwell just behind his lead Secret Service man, with another man right behind him . . . and I ran headlong into him!

"Oh! Mr. President!" I said, aghast.

He just chuckled.

But the Secret Service were not quite so amused.

God bless President Reagan. It is an enduring honor to have served him. He brought down the Berlin Wall and won the Cold War. . . with a warm heart.
###
Victory in this war with Mudville Gazette and Open Post.

See the real world Outside The Beltway at Traffic Jam.

More sanity at RightWing Nuthouse at The Top 10 Americans? who led us to John Hawkins' more serious list of the top 10:

1) George Washington
2) Abe Lincoln
3) Thomas Jefferson
4) Ben Franklin
5) James Madison
6) Ronald Reagan
7) Andrew Jackson
8) Tom Paine
9) Teddy Roosevelt
10) Alexander Hamilton

See Reagan in Lights at WILLisms, classy as always, Will includes one of his great speeches.


Heather Thibault Part One: Women in Combat

June 26, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

My dear, Heather. It's not about YOU.

Heather Thibault was a medic in Iraq with the Army National Guard and recently returned home from Camp Anaconda, north of Baghdad. A profile of her in yesterday's Seattle Post-Intelligencer Reporter was titled Limits on combat upset female medic. The subtitle: "Ready, willing and unable to fight."

Because, of course, it's all about Heather. Heather is, "upset." Heather is, "feisty." Heather is, "buff." Heather is, "angered."

Why is she angry? Because Heather has, according to the paper, "Right uniform, wrong chromosome."

femalesoldier_heather_thibault.jpg

Heather Thibault
Photo Credit:
Meryl Schenker
Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Well, before we get too worked up about that wrong chromosome, here's another thing Heather is:

Heather is, "barely 5 feet" tall. Doesn't say whether that includes her combat boots. It does say that Heather is, all of 125 pounds.

Her service to our country should be honored -- the article says she has nightmares from her experiences caring for the wounded in Iraq. Her hands were bloodied in the care of wounded, as nurses did during Vietnam, and other wars.

But battlefield medics are charged with evacuating wounded. While the reporter is busy venting spleen over the big, bad "military policy" keeping Heather out of combat -- as if engaging the enemy is some glorified Disneyland ride that they kept her from experiencing -- the article doesn't express any interest in Thibault's ability, or not, to carry a 180 pound soldier (plus 80 lbs of battle rattle) out of harm's way.

The article snears at this concern as a "weaker sex" argument. So be it. I wouldn't bet my son's life on her upper body strength.

NO one has a "right" to go into combat. We're facing a relentless drumbeat from the media, with stories of individual women who "should be allowed" to go into combat. But it's not about them. It's not about the individual. Combat is about the mission, unit cohesion and survival.

Those men we do ask to risk their lives -- and the hopes and dreams of all those who love them -- by going into combat have the right to expect us to do everything humanly possible to give them the best chance of coming out alive.

That's the only right we should be concerned about.

* * *

There's a subtext to this story that is worth mentioning. The article mentions that since returning from Iraq, Heather has been visiting local schools to talk with young people. Here's what she has to say about the war on terror:

We're throwing rocks at a hornet's nest, turning moderates into religious fanatics, and you're going to inherit the problem. ...

It kind of sucks when you piss off the whole world.

Maybe she forgot that whole World Trade Center meltdown thing. . .

* * *

Thanks Mrs. Greyhawk for Open Post at Mudville.

And check out Wizbang's Carnival of the Trackbacks. . .

Then dance over to Beth's Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and her Open Trackbacks. . .

More women a-fighting at Shakespeare's Sister at BlogWhoring.

Knowledge is Power has some thoughts and appreciation for sacrifice women make.


The Elephant Woman: She's a Large Mammal!

June 25, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Shazam! I woke up this morning to discover I had become a Large Mammal.

elephant-woman.gif

(From Population: 3
A Comedy Theatre Troupe)

Just call me the Elephant Woman!

Some of you may remember the excitement around here when I moved up to become a Marauding Marsupial. Others of you are saying: Mammals, Marsupials. . .What?? Has she lost her mind?

N.Z. Bear, over at The Truth Laid Bear, ranks blogs by the number of links other bloggers have given them. The TTLB Ecosystem starts out at Insignificant Microbe and travels up the food chain to Higher Beings.

So this is a really fun milestone here at Reasoned Audacity and . . .

I Thank You!

However you made your way here to this site, I'm grateful for your time. I'm doubly grateful for those of you who have made my day with your kind comments and emails -- and those links.

Do keep coming back!

I want to say a special thank you to the Ladies of The Cotillion! A quick check of Technorati confirms my happy suspicion that you gals put me over the top.

###

Updated July 14: Kevin Drum at The Washingon Monthly has an interesting reading list,

...the women I read are considerably more liberal and considerably more anti-Bush than the guys.


Media Advisory: I'm doing CNN today

June 24, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Today at 5 pm EST your Audacious (yet so Reasonable), blogger is schedule to appear on CNN to discuss a new campaign from the cable television industry called "Control Your TV."

cnn_logo.gif

Please tune in and let me know what you think.

UPDATE 7 PM:

Had a lot of fun at the taping: the Dude went with me -- my entourage. Beefy security always handy to have around!

charlie_john_cnn.jpg

Me and my entourage

But, if you tuned in at 5 this afternoon, then you know all about the explosion in St. Louis today. . .definitely trumps a discussion of the cable industry's improved ratings system. Since the interview was taped instead of live, I'm guessing they'll run it later. I'll let you know if they tell me. But if you do see it, send comments!

john_green_room.jpg

The Dude in
the Green Room


Remembering Jessica Lunsford

| By Charmaine Yoest

jessica_lunsford.jpg

Jessica Lunsford

This is why we have the death penalty. Convicted sex offender John Couey says that he buried Jessica Lunsford alive, her hands tied with stereo wire, after raping her.

* * *

From Tammy at A Mom and Her Blog.


Et Tu, Michael? Hearts and Head-stones. . .

June 23, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Be careful whom you marry: they might get to pick your gravestone.

As Janette at Common Sense Runs Wild and Jody at Steal the Bandwagon have noted, Terri Schiavo's grave marker, is All About Michael.

And an inscription lesson for us all. Sadly, Terri was not the first to be slighted by a surviving spouse. Remember Fred Astaire? Oh, yeah, him, the husband of What's-Her-Name:

astaire_head_stone.jpg

The Wall Street Journal reminded us of selfish spouses in Having a Say in Your Epitaph:

He was the world's best-known dancer and a legendary film star. But if you visit Fred Astaire's gravesite in Chatsworth, Calif., you're reminded only of this: He had a widow.

He married his second wife, Robyn, in 1980, when he was 81 years old and she was 35. After he died in 1987, she wrote the 11 words on his grave marker: "Fred Astaire. I will always love you my darling. Thank you."

There's a lesson here. If you want your tombstone to be about you, you'd better speak up. Otherwise, whoever is in charge of picking out your marker might decide to chisel something along the lines of: "Enough about him. Let me tell you about me."

And so we see the same nonsense from Michael "I Kept my Promise" Schiavo (Which promise was that? The one about being faithful Till Death Do Us Part?):

terri_schiavo_tomestone.jpg

With apologies to Shakespeare's Julius Ceasar:

I come to bury Terri,

Not to praise her.

The evil that I do lives after her;

The good is interred with her bones...

When love begins to sicken and decay,


It useth an enforcèd ceremony.

By heaven, I had rather have coins,


And drop her blood for drachmas...

Pick your mate with care. They just might get the last word.

* * *

See also Tammy at A Mom and Her Blog.

A salute to Mudville Gazette who understand duty and honor at Open Post.

Thank you to Outside The Beltway giving voice to others on Beltway Traffic Jam.

ProLifeBlogs gets it right in the debate in Bobby Schindler Responds

More Shakespeare's Sister speaking out on BlogWhoring.


Alberto Gonzales to Replace Sandra Day O'Connor Says Bill Kristol

| By Charmaine Yoest

Bill Kristol says that Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor will step down next week -- not the Chief Justice as everyone has been expecting -- and that the President will replace her with his close friend, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. (Heard hangin' out at the Corner from John Podhoretz.)

gonzales.jpg

Alberto Gonzales

A moderate for a moderate. That's how they'll sell it. That's how Washington works.

SandraDayOConnor.jpg

Sandra Day O'Connor
Credit: Joe Marquette
EPA/Associated Press






















The Gonzalez appointment has been kickin' around for a looong time. The President is determined to see him on the High Court. For more on Gonzalez and the politics of his nomination, see this 2003 article from Ramesh Ponnuru.


Intellectuelle Contest Winners

| By Charmaine Yoest

There's going to be a new group blog of Christian women bloggers, hosted over at Evangelical Outpost. This project is the brainchild of Marla Swoffer, who ran a contest on her site, picking five women out of 31 who submitted essays to join her and Bonnie at Off the Top in launching "Intellectuelle" on the 28th.

marla.jpg

Marla Swoffer

I was honored when Marla asked me to join the panel of judges and really enjoyed reading all of the submissions. Marla announced the winners yesterday.

I am excited about their project and look forward to reading the new blog regularly. However, one of my favorite entries didn't make it into the final five, so I wanted to give her some extra kudos here at Reasoned Audacity. . .

karanother.jpg

Take a minute to read It Isn't Just a Kodak Moment, by Joy at Karagraphy. I love these lines: "My provincial existence amounts to a hyphen on a tombstone. An infinitesimal moment, at best, on an infinite timeline." Read the rest to see what she means. . .


Getting a Corsage for the Cotillion. . .

| By Charmaine Yoest

cotillion2.jpg

A group of conservative women bloggers, who like to wear pearls for parties and politics -- what could be better??!! Dance on over to the Cotillion and join the fun. This is a group of very funny, gutsy and smart women.

Find the weekly roundup here.


Susan Torres and Her Baby Need Your Help

June 22, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Susan_Peter Torres.jpg-small.jpg

Susan and Peter Torres

Susan Torres was 17 weeks pregnant when she collapsed and stopped breathing the day before Mother's Day. Her husband performed CPR and she was rushed to the hospital, where they discovered that she has a stage four melanoma cancer invading her brain.

The doctors have told her husband, Jason, that they cannot save Susan. But they are working valiantly to save her baby.

Even as Susan declines, the baby appears to be well -- yesterday Susan's family reported that they have felt the baby kicking . . . Susan and the baby need to make it to July 11th to give the baby the best chance of survival.

Please keep this family in your prayers. Susan and Jason have a two-year-old son, Peter. How hard it will be for them to welcome the baby, and say goodbye to Susan at the same time.

And if you can support them financially, they do need help with the cost: their expenses are mounting with at least $1500 a day that is not covered by their insurance. Details on how to contribute, and to get updates on Susan and the baby are available here. There is a link there for donating via Paypal; checks can also be sent to:

The Susan M. Torres Fund
c/o Faith and Action
P.O. Box 34105
Washington, D.C. 20043-0105

Pete on the Beach.jpg-small.jpg

Peter Torres

The family notes at the website that they don't want Susan's story to turn into something political. So I won't say much about this. But it is striking to me that in all of the stories I have read about this tragedy, the reporters always refer to the precious life tenaciously growing, developing and kicking within Susan as. . . a baby.

Steal The Bandwagon on the issue early as always


Kathy Hilton Has. . . Class?

| By Charmaine Yoest

So Paris Hilton's mother has her own television show. No surprise there.

hiltons.jpg

Kathy and Paris Hilton
Pic credit: AP Photo/Chris Polk

But the PR spin is a jaw-dropper. Here's the headline for the cover of this week's TV Week in our area:

CLASS. She Has It. 14 Contestants Want It. Will Any of Them Get It?

The inside article is titled: "Class Is in Session with Kathy Hilton."

But I love the subtitle best: "The Woman Who Gave Paris Hilton Her Polish Introduces Humble Souls to High Society."

Sigh. So now we're taking lessons on class from the woman who raised. . . Paris Hilton??!!

Reality TV Magazine
has the best overview as always.


Let Big Bird Fly on its own Power

June 21, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

When should entertainment have claim on the public purse?

Congress will reduce the NPR and PBS budget from $200,000,000 to a mere $100 million. Our friends on the left are Outraged! Outraged!

sesame_street_cartoon.gif

Cartoon credit: Blue Girl's "better half"

Our lefty friends (no friends of the free market) have different takes. Over at Blue Girl in a Red State there seems to be some confusion between work and charity.

feminist majority150.gif
Meanwhile, the Feminist Minority fears for a free press:

Take Action for Independent Media

The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to consider an appropriations bill Wednesday which will make drastic cuts in the budgets of the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR) from $200 million to $100 million.

In their ongoing efforts to control the media, the right wing is using the Congressional appropriations process to decimate public radio and television. We could lose this critical independent voice and quality programming.

Take action today! Click here to urge your Representative to stand up for the independent media free from partisan and ideological control by voting for full funding for PBS and NPR.

hannah_interview_yellow_bird.gif

Big Bird can fly on its own. When The Dreamer was 18 months old we comforted her on camera when interviewed -- by a stuffed animal we had paid for with real money. Plus tax. (Or more likely, a grandmother paid for with real money. . .) The Yellow Bird to the rescue!

A cool 100 million dollars. We could get one very nice, brand new F-22 Raptor. And the world would be a better place.

Peggy Noonan says, news flash: PBS is liberal. . . and that Democrats may even admit as much. . . (though, obviously, not the Fem Minority who seems to think PBS/NPR is an "independent critical voice").

A civil hat tip to the liberal GrubbyKid.

See Mudville Gazette with the unsubsidized Open Post.

Right Wing Sparkle
has more at PBS Funding: Is It Worth It?

Trey Jackson sick of taxes for Lefty Liberal Bile Hat tip to Trey for pointing us to Atlas Shrugs...

Atlas Shrugs can lift and move any debate especially on PBS


In Pursuit of Princes: Happy Father's Day

June 20, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Monday morning . . . bumping this Father's Day post from Friday to the top of the page. I've also added more links below . . . Hope you had a good weekend, and Happy Father's Day! More later.

* * *

john_jack_shoulders.jpg

My prince and his boy

I have a Father's Day piece up today over at the Independent Women's Forum site. Here's how it begins:

In Pursuit of Princes
I wonder how long it will be before Father’s Day is relegated to the remainder bin of history.

Ironically, when the end of fatherhood is written, the title will be: In Pursuit of Pleasure. Gay and defiant, confident in its indictment of the patriarchy, the culture dances unheedingly away with the playboy replacement. The arbiters of cool nod approvingly; the guardians of the gifted grant their blessing.

When midnight strikes, she wakes up alone. A baby cries. Full consciousness reveals no prince. No slipper. Only shards of glass mark her broken dreams.

Sadly, this is no apocalyptic vision of some dystopic future. It is today’s reality for many women and their children. Father’s Day may still have some kick to it: this weekend, cards will be bought; burgers will be charred on the barbecue. Meanwhile, our culture is dancing with the drummer...and relentlessly undermining the very heart of fatherhood. . . .

iwf.gif
Read the rest over at Independent Women's Forum!

And Happy Father's Day.

To the thoughtful Princes at Mudville Gazette writing on Open Post.

Thank you to James Joyner controlling traffic, if not culture Outside the Beltway with quality contributors on Beltway Traffic Jam.

See alternative thoughts and lifestyles at Shakespeare's Sister on Friday BlogRolling.

Update: Read more from the vast right wing on My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and good writing at Weekend Open Trackbacks

Thank you for a wiz-bang good blog at Wizbang with Carnival of the Trackbacks XVI

Salute to Dad lifting up his son on 365 and a Wakeup, see Happy Father's Day

Little BlackFive scores on Happy Father's Day

Pro-Life Blogs has a link to remind us about fathers and their aborted children at Father’s Day 2005 - 48 Million Killed

IMAO has (a funny) (or maybe not) (or is it?) Happy Father's Day (somebody let me know).


Welcome Townhall.com Readers

June 18, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

townhall_logo.GIF

Thank you for clicking through to the Independent Women's Forum and to Reasoned Audacity. It is an honor to have you visit.


Family Governance 101: Children of the World, Unite!

June 17, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

We were all headed out in the Black Rocket. I was reviewing with the Penta-Posse what they could expect from the day.

Some of the details were not received with enthusiasm.

election_nite_2004_posse_roe_effect_yoest.JPG

Anarchists. Clearly.
Election Night 2004

The Dreamer decided she had some better ideas, and offered them. In a tone of voice which was, shall we say, ill-advised.

"And what," said I, "makes you think [the part she didn't want to do] is up for discussion?"

"I was just trying to offer a compromise," she replied. (Still with the 'tude.)

"Well," I responded, "This isn't a democracy." (Okay, so that was a little snarky. . .)

Jack decided to clarify: "No, this is a benign dictatorship."

Then, from the far back, the Dude (lovin' the fact that his sister was in trouble) chimes in:

"No, this is ANARCHY!"


"F" is for Foolish: New Online 'Zine for Teens

June 16, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

f_word.gif

F is for Foolish

I'm beginning to think that "F" stands for foolish. Whenever you see someone making a big production out of saying F**k, you know immediately two things are true: A) the person in question thinks saying so makes them sexually "free;" and B) they are over-compensating for being sexually messed up.

Need an illustration? Genevieve over at Feminine-Genius has the skinny on a new 'zine called "the F Word."

Sorry, girls, using F**k as a mantra isn't going to get you the good sex life you're looking for.

Try "I do."


The Democrat View of the World

| By Charmaine Yoest

A Harvard business professor once suggested that 2 X 2 matrix note pads should be issued to the student body, necessary as the four blocks are to consulting, politics and life. So for next year's Political Parties 101 syllabus, here is one of the best political party worldview comparisons your Audacious (yet, so reasonable. . .) Political Scientist has seen all week:

democratview.gif


Tom McMahon over at The Strategy of Bingo. The Excitement of Chess. (Love that title.) Good to visit for other pics, graphs and most excellent humor.

A salute from the mortar board to Mudville Gazette with the smart kids writing on Open Post


Baseball Blogging: Orioles Beat Astros!

| By Charmaine Yoest

orioles_game.jpg

The Diva and The Dude
with The Nephews

"Mom, c'mon, make some noise!"

One of life's great joys: a major league baseball game with a ten-year-old boy. Bright lights. A summer breeze. The Sosa Swing.

"Woah. Mom. Check it out. 96 mph!"

Finally, I felt so guilty that I was having all the fun sitting next to the Dude that I offered to switch seats with Jack so he could enjoy the play-by-play commentary.

And the Orioles won.

# # #

Leaving the stadium, we paused for a moment in front of a beautiful memorial, honoring our veterans who made the supreme sacrifice. We are indeed eternally grateful. . . both to them, and to you who are serving today.

camden_yards_eternal_gratitude.jpg
As a Memorial to All Who so Valiantly Fought

and Served in the World Wars

with Eternal Gratitude

to Those Who Made the Supreme Sacrifice

to Preserve Equality and Freedom

Throughout the World

Time Will Not Dim the Glory of Their Deeds

Right Thinking Girl asks all the right questions on LiveBlogging Baseball.

Attaboy talks about the fellowship and the Great American Pasttime at Attending Services.


USS Bonefish, Lost June 18, 1945

| By Charmaine Yoest

Sixty years ago on Saturday, June 18th, 1945, the Japanese sunk the USS Bonefish, with the loss of all hands. A young torpedo-man, John Yoest, received transfer papers some time prior to her last voyage, and walked off the submarine, safely. His son, John Yoest, Jr. is my husband . . . and the following is a tribute Jack wrote several years ago to the men of the Bonefish. This piece was originally published by The Virginian Pilot and the Courier Post.

DEBT OF HONOR: REMEMBERING THE USS BONEFISH

My father, then only a teen-ager from Jersey, left high school, went to war and was assigned to the submarine, USS Bonefish. Just before the final mission of the Bonefish, my father walked off the gangplank - transferred to another assignment. Another man took his place.

bonefish_223ReturnFromPatrol4.jpg

USS Bonefish,
Returning from her 4th patrol.
Sailors, rest your oars.

On its eighth mission, on June 18, 1945, the Bonefish was lost fighting the enemy in the Sea of Japan, with the loss of all 53 officers and men. It was the last U.S. submarine sunk in World War II. Dad eventually went back to high school and married my mother. The other man is "on eternal patrol," as the veterans say.

A half-century later, after fighting in and surviving two wars, my father was buried in Arlington Cemetery. He had the chance to raise a family and devote 30 years to the armed services, and pin second lieutenant bars on my shoulders. He didn't talk much about the Bonefish or the man who replaced him. Still, I imagine in some Navy Valhalla my dad and this other sailor linked up together and asked the Creator, “Why?”

“Why him? Why me?”

jack_dad_sailornew.jpg

John Sr. with John Jr.

War forces these questions on us, and they echo for generations. My father had me, and I now have a 4-year-old son, John, who carries his grandfather's name and his love of battle and discipline.

john_dad_sailornew.jpg

John III with John Jr. (Jack)

John, like all children, often asks, “Why?” Like all fathers, I struggle to answer. But there are questions mere human reason cannot fathom.

Why was my father not on that submarine that fateful day?

And the answer does not come. Only that John now lives. With a purpose and a destiny still unknown.

When my wife was pregnant with our first child, someone asked her, “What is your greatest fear?” She answered that it was losing her husband; she feared the possibility of facing the awesome responsibility of motherhood alone. But now, several children later, as I reflect on that same question, my fear is not of losing her, or even one of our daughters. I fear losing my son. In my masculine pride, I believe I can protect my wife and girls, but in my heart lurks the dread possibility that I must one day send my son to war.

My boy loves my cavalry saber and my dad's medals. Wearing a military uniform and military service runs in our family. My son's bloodline is traced through the Civil War and the Revolutionary War to William Penn to Charlemagne of ninth century France. His great-grandfather helped build Virginia Military Institute. I pray the time never comes, but if it does, I expect that he will fight for God and country like his fathers before him.

Buried at sea, there are no headstones. I cannot mark the grave of the man who took my father's place, so I mark the date. I pay silent homage in remembrance of June 18, 1945, when the sea smashed through the bulkheads and turned a warship into a coffin. There have been many such coffins, and if history is any teacher there are many yet to come.

When I think of future wars, I pray that a doomed high-tech Bonefish will not carry my John. The fear of this nearly unendurable loss humbles me. That young man who walked on the Bonefish to take my father's place was another man's son. Another man's dreams lost at sea. War turns civilization on its head. In peace, sons bury fathers. In war, fathers bury sons.

It is a weighty debt. A debt of honor due. I expect to instill in my son a sense of history, of purpose, of his mission. That his body is not entirely his own, that he has a high calling. I hope that I can teach him the lessons of his forefathers, those men now called the Greatest Generation.

It is my prayer that instilling this sense of mission will drive out the distractions, temptations and destructions of his growing generation. That drugs will not cloud his ambition. That he will see the hand of divine providence moving in his life. That he will know he has so much to be thankful for. Like his fathers before him.

I pray he will be grateful, like his grandfather. It is my charge to tell my son that another man took his grandfather's place. My son has the duty, and like me, the obligation to his family and to that other man, to live with a sense of purpose and awe. To live with a sense of respect to the tomb of that other young submariner.

This June 18, I want to salute the man who died for me and the men who died for us all. I want my son to know his debt of honor. And, God willing, my son will bury me.

# # #

Since this was first published a few years ago, we've been honored to hear from other veterans who served on the Bonefish and naval historians. There were actually 85 men lost aboard the Bonefish and another boat holds the distinction of last sub lost in the war.

And, since this piece was written, we've added John's brother James to the family -- here he is in the same sailor suit that Jack's dad sewed by hand while at sea.

james_sailor.jpg

James and Jack

See here for our recent visit to Arlington Cemetery.

Thank you for the inter-service support to Mudville Gazette on Open Post


The Anti-Military "Earth Tribe" Should Be Ashamed

June 14, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Linda Foley, the young coed holding the "F**k the Army" sign and their whole anti-military "earth tribe" should be ashamed (see below). Very ashamed.

While the military's critics are here at home, comfortable in their air-conditioned safety, our soldiers are hard at work. Remember Captain Thunder? (The story of his knighting here.)

Take some time today to read at 365 and a Wakeup what our military is really doing in Iraq:

Our destination was a nameless postage stamp of a village squatting in a thicket of palm and date trees. . .

We had several boxes of toys, clothes and shoes ready to pass out, but as soon as the CSM finished talking the eager children descended on me like a flock of starving pigeons. These were children who had never even dreamed of owning a stuffed animal, let alone had one dangled in front of them. But even that knowledge didn't prepare me for the riot of little hands blindly reaching for toys. . . One minute there was a box brimming with toys and in the next there was just a crushed piece of cardboard.

And then I noticed one of the village patriarchs sitting in the dirt. . . The gentleman had no legs. . .Apparently this man had once had a wheelchair, but it had been destroyed by Saddam's men years before. Now it sat in a rusted pile behind his home. He was too proud to ask us to help him with its repair.

Needless to say that wheelchair is sitting in our FOB right now. With a few parts and some hard work our mechanics just might be able to make that wish come true.

Who are the good guys? Who are the bad guys? Shouldn't be a hard call.


And the Left Wonders Why the Country Thinks They Are Anti-Military?

June 13, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Hillary Clinton and the Democrats have a problem. Hillary joined the Armed Services Committee in order to establish some military cred for her 2008 Presidential run. But her peeps on the Left keep popping out of the closet to prove just exactly why the right wing thinks they are against the military.

"Oh yes," they say (when pressed), "We support our troops. It's those nasty recruiters we don't like. . ."

fuckthearmy.jpg

Exhibit A: Here's a picture from a demonstration at the University of California, Santa Cruz on March 5th specifically targeting the on-campus military recruiters. The caption underneath the picture read: "Direct, unambiguous language is helpful for making your point clear to everyone." Yeah, I'll say. "FTA" used to be seen only as latrine graffiti.

So it's just one ungrateful girl with a potty mouth. Well, no. Here are a few of the comments underneath:

Malgoska: "I also hope your actions are highly contagious. Hey, other universities - are you listening?"

Drew Nelson: "That's just beautiful. . . We need more brave and fiery souls such as those at UCSC."

Anonymous: "awesome!! There are still folks around with heart who have the b**ls to stand up against what is so wrong with todays world...f**k the military industrial complex and the biggest terrorist on the planet Bush and his corporate buddies, well done people...people of the earth tribe rise!!!!"

Iwantyou.jpg

Banned on Campus?

And it's not just on campus. An anti-recruiter diatribe, "Reading, Writing and Recruiting," took up some valuable real estate right in the middle of Saturday's Washington Post op-ed page.

Diane Paul, identified as a writer who "worked for Human Rights Watch in Bosnia" and as a consultant to UNICEF and the UN (of course), wants military recruiters out of the publically funded education system. "The military should not be permitted to use our schools as vehicles to send young people to war," she argues. Here's my favorite part of her polemic:

. . .we have to ask ourselves whether children between the ages of 14 and 17 have the maturity to make what may be life-or-death decisions based on promises of easy cash and a college education

I would bet you 30 cents that she also believes that these same "children" do "have the maturity" to make life-or-death decisions about sexual relationships and abortion without parental guidance. Bet me. Condoms yes. Cadence no.

She then goes on to conclude that: "the government must also ensure the protection of our children and safeguard the role of public schools as places of learning." Hey, now there we agree!

If you're in-step with me on this, then you'll not want to miss Scott Ott's satirical take on recruiters over at ScrappleFace. It's funny, but in that sock-you-in-the-gut kind of way. It's a "news release" entitled "Army Offers New Recruiting Incentive: Duty."

Journalists at the news conference, baffled by the terminology, unleashed a barrage of questions about why anyone would volunteer to fight for a country that runs a gulag at Gitmo, invades peaceful sovereign nations like Iraq and has no respect for the most Holy Koran.

Hoo-ah! People of the earth tribe . . . unite for Hillary 2008!

***

March over to Mudville Gazette, American Flag Open Post. . .

See more on the Left at Blogwhoring on Shakespeare's Sister. (Odd convergence: My dissertation was entitled, "Empowering Shakespeare's Sister.")

Also see my earlier post on "Would You Sell Out D-Day . . . for a Pulitzer?"

A salute to Outside The Beltway for Beltway Traffic Jam for a terrific selection of contributors.

More insight on Military Recruitment Down at La Shawn Barber's Corner.

Update: Other news headlines at Wizbang's outstanding round-up The 10 Spot - Headline Edition.

Update: Get into the Beltway Traffic Jam on Outside the Beltway.

Update June 22, 2005 e-Claire has pic


Powerade at the Marine Corps Marathon!

June 10, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

When Jack and I trained for past marathons we floated Pepsi stock on the gallons of Gatorade we drank and spilled. Now, we're training for the Marine Corps Marathon coming up in October and we won't be drinking Pepsi products: it will be Coke's Powerade for us.

marine_corps_marathon_banner.gif

Turns out everyone will be drinking Powerade! It's the official drink of the race and, according to race HQ, "POWERade will be filling more than 180,000 cups across all 13 water points to aid runners in maintaining proper hydration."

The water stations at a marathon are a sight to see . . . The Marine Corps Marathon has 30,000 runners participating -- and they all need (a lot) to drink, and most don't want to stop running, so every other mile there's a major logistical effort involved in throwing hydration at the runners. Imagine 180,000 cups!

powerade65.jpg

So hey: memo to Coca-Cola (maker of Powerade) -- there's time to roll out Camo-Ade in time for the Marine Corps Marathon!!

Major E. may still be thirsty. But if POWERade can get fluids to Washington, DC, Irag should not be far behind.

* * *
Running with The Open Post at Mudville Gazette


Svetlana: Sex Trafficking and 21st Century Slavery

| By Charmaine Yoest

While we welcome and celebrate the birth of little girls, it is important to remember how fortunate we are here in America. Other little girls -- and young women and boys -- around the world are suffering in prostitution and slavery.

banner_sex.jpg

Photo credit: DOL

This past Friday, the State Department released their annual report on sex trafficking. In her statement, Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice said that the State Department estimates that sex trafficking across international borders involves at least 800,000 people every year, with millions more involved within their own countries.

sex_trafficking_father_rescue.jpg

A Nepalese father
who rescued his daughter
out of slavery
in India

This is 21st century slavery.

I recently did a presentation on this issue at Cedarville University and I've posted the powerpoint online here.

In his remarks, Ambassador John R. Miller, Senior Advisor on Trafficking in Persons
told the story of Svetlana, a girl affected by sex trafficking:

sex_trafficking_mother_search.jpg

A mother searching
for her daughter

Last year, Svetlana was a young woman living in Belarus, looking for a job. She came upon some Turkish men who promised her a well-paying job in Istanbul and once Svetlana crossed the border, the men seized her money, her papers, her passport. They locked her up. They forced her into prostitution. And then one night, they farmed her out to two businessmen, just like a commodity.

Desperate, Svetlana jumped out of a window and fell six stories to a sidewalk. According to Turkish court documents, the so-called customers went down, found her on the sidewalk and instead of calling the police, called the traffickers, who killed her.

Svetlana's body lay unclaimed in the morgue for two weeks until Turkish authorities learned her identity and sent her body to Belarus.

The State Department's TIP, Trafficking in Persons, Office classifies countries worldwide who are involved in trafficking into three tiers and a watch list. Tier Three are the worst offenders "whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards." This list includes perennial bad guys Cuba and North Korea, but also some key American allies like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. When a reporter asked Ambassador Miller about these countries at the press conference, he was clearly uncomfortable.

QUESTION: -- and many of them have laws in place, not to mention authoritarian regimes that should be able to enforce these laws, one would think. Could you help us understand why they aren't doing more, especially being such close allies of the U.S. in counterterrorism, for example? And we really do want to know who's been sanctioned.

AMBASSADOR MILLER: I'm glad you've -- the toughest question comes last. Well, in terms of countries that have been sanctioned, if you look at the countries in -- nobody has been sanctioned this year. If you look at the countries from last year's report, and we can -- I can't recall them from memory, but you can -- our staff can get them to you, but your -- the tough part of your question was -- well, here are close friends of the United States; how can this happen?

Exactly. How can this happen? And why can't we do more?

How long does Saudi Arabia get to continue being such a world-class slaver and incubator of terrorists. . . and remain our friend?

Obviously it's a complicated problem with difficult answers. Ambassador Miller responded that we need more public awareness. So this is my small entry in the fight. . . .

For Svetlana.

And, even more importantly, for the little girls like Svetlana who still live today in slavery.

* * *

UPDATE June 13th: Welcome Balloon-Juice readers! Thanks, John. He's got a pretty intense pie-fight going on over "Those Wacky Feminists."

See The Progressive Blog Alliance HQ on the UK and the EU on trafficked prostitutes

Also see NuLabor and the Sex Slave Trade and the UK and EU debate

More info at the Polaris Project

For more on other subjects from the Left see Friday BlogWhoring at Shakespeare's Sister

See Cao's Blog for more on the Saudi Wahhabi problem

Thank you to the good-guys at Outside the Beltway for having the Traffic Jam

Update: Whatsakyer reports on the issue here in USA: Saudi couple enslaves Indonesian woman in Colorado

Thank you to the Rough Men and good writers at Open Post on Mudville Gazette.

Update July 14: Whatsakyer presents another debate.


Thank Heaven for Little Girls: Congrats to George and Jeffrey

June 9, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

gibby_lava.JPG

Thank heaven for little girls for little girls get bigger every day! Thank heaven for little girls they grow up in the most delightful way! Those little eyes so helpless and appealing one day will flash and send you crashin' thru the ceilin'. . .
* * *

george_awentworth.jpg

George Stephanopoulos
and Ali Wentworth

Credit: Andrea Renault/Globe

Shortly after she became engaged to George Stephanopoulos, Alexandra, "Ali" Wentworth and I were riding the elevator up to tape Politically Incorrect. George was, at the time, one of Washington's most eligible bachelors, so the engagement was a Big Deal here in the Nation's Capital. Just to make conversation, I asked Ali if it was weird for her personal happiness to be such a big media event.

She looked at me quizzically, shrugged, and replied: "Well, it would have been the same if I'd married a rock star."

Oh. Right.

Well huzzah for high expectations. She was actually quite pleasant, so I'm glad to see that my cynically low expectations for their union appear ill-founded. The Big News now is the arrival of a new Stephanopoulos: their second daugher, Harper.

You can read all about it at the Celebrity Baby Blog, which is a hoot. But they missed the news of another important recent baby girl arrival, blog baby: Caitlyn King!

caitlyn_king.jpg

Caitlyn King

But she's a celebrity here: look at that cute face. Caitlyn is the daughter of Jeffrey King at [defunct blog]Three Fingers. Daddy and daughter and mom are doing fine.

The years go by too fast . . . we're thanking heaven for our first baby girl, who turned twelve this week. Before you know it, you turn around, and they look like this. . .Happy Birthday, baby, I love you.

hannah_tree.jpg

My sweet Dreamer
Photo credit: Helena Yoest

So Congratulations George and Jeffrey! And welcome Harper and Caitlyn.

While I am all teary over my baby girl's birthday, my husband, Jack is gearing up for battle with the boys. He insists I send along to you new fathers his battle-plan -- W. Bruce Cameron's 8 Rules for Dating my Teenage Daughter, a must-read for every dad with a daughter. He thinks you might want to keep it handy. . .

W. Bruce Cameron's Rules
Rule One: If you pull into my driveway and honk you'd better be delivering a package, because you're sure as heck not picking anything up.

Rule Two: You do not touch my daughter in front of me. You may glance at her, so long as you do not peer at anything below her neck. If you cannot keep your eyes or hands off of my daughter's body, I will remove them.

Thank you to Mudville Gazette for Open Post

(** And if this trackback belongs to you:» http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2576807, please contact me: I owe you a link! **)

Update: Thanks to Wizbang with Carnival of the Trackbacks XV for helping to celebrate.

Update: Big Congratulations for another girl-baby blogger! June 6th, 2005 “BORN” Lillianne Grace Ransom. Newport Beach, CA. 8 pounds, three ounces. Posted by Greg Ransom at PrestoPundit, alerted byMusing Minds at Congratulations to the Ransoms

The world is a better place.

28 June 2005, Up Date on another baby girl alerted by Marla Swoffer.


Continue Reading »

Virgins with Attitude

June 8, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

virgin_shirt.jpg

At Dusty Brand shirts

How great is this??

From Seeker at two or three.net.


But Where's the Bling?: Pepsi Responds to Major E.

| By Charmaine Yoest

Pepsi and Major E. (serving in Baghdad) are exchanging letters again. Scott Johnson at Powerline has just posted Pepsi's latest non-response to Major E.'s request for a disavowal of Indra Nooyi's insult to America.
pepsi_vending_machine.jpg

Free Pepsi vending machine
for the war machine

The key Pepsi response line is this: "Clearly PepsiCo does not now, nor have we ever, considered the U.S. as disrespectful towards the rest of world."

Major E. responds: "If Pepsico feels that the US is not, and has never been, disrespecful toward the rest of the world, why does Pepsico accept Ms. Nooyi's explanation that she made a 'thoughtless gesture or comment'?"

Here's the essential point -- the letter to the Major comes from PepsiCo VP of consumer relations Christine Jones. "Chris," as she signs her letter, seems like a nice person and the letter is nice enough. . . but it's still just words. We've not heard a peep from Pepsi's President, nor have they taken any real action to make restitution.

What do I mean? This is the heart of the matter. If my husband makes me angry,(or vice versa!) in order to make things right, he says "I'm sorry." And it's over. And that's the strategy Pepsi is pursuing. Lay low; let it blow over.

But, alternatively, if my husband (in some inconceivable parallel universe) would publicly insult me, to make it right, he would have to bring flowers, chocolate, and maybe even some serious bling.

So, in case you were wondering what those of us who are still pretty irritated with Pepsi are looking for, that's it. (For specifics, see here.)

C'mon Pepsi, where's the bling?

coke_tank.jpg
Proposed Coke tank
for Tanks

Update: Thank you for the Open Post at Mudville Gazette


Carrie French, 19, Killed in Iraq

| By Charmaine Yoest

Another woman has been killed in Iraq.

carrie_french.jpg

Carrie French

Carrie served as a Specialist in the National Guard's 145th Support Battalion, which was attached to the 116th Brigade Combat Team. She was killed by a roadside bomb explosion in Kirkuk, Iraq.

Who is in charge here?

The President said last January, emphatically, no women in combat. But clearly, women are in combat. The military has saluted the Commander-in-Chief, said "Yes, sir," and then turned right around and sent women into combat. By using the word "attached," they get around the regulations that say women can't be "assigned" to a unit with a combat mission.

I support this President; I support this war; I support our troops, both the men and the women. What troubles me is this fiction of saying our policy is one thing -- no women in combat -- and then doing another -- deliberately sending female troops in harm's way.

In addition to her Purple Heart, Carrie will qualify her for a Combat Action Badge, awarded posthumously. And her death in harm's way continues General Schoomaker's Boiling the Frog strategy of legalizing women in combat.

A Thank you to Mudville Gazette's Open Post


Hillary Hilarity

| By Charmaine Yoest

clinton_hillary.jpg

I can tell you this: It's very hard to stop people who have no shame about what they're doing.... It is very hard to stop people who have never been acquainted with the truth.

Hillary Clinton, attacking George Bush at a June 6th Democratic fundraiser

According to the American Spectator's Washington Prowler, "Even Democrats were laughing" about this one.


Defining Murder Down

June 7, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

gerardo_flores.jpg

Gerardo Flores
Photo Credit: AP

erica.jpg

Erica Basoria
Photo Credit: Lufkin High School

Is there a "pro-choice" activist in America who wants to argue that Gerardo Flores shouldn't have been convicted of murdering his twin sons? Gerardo, who is 19, was sentenced to life in prison after he stomped on his girlfriend's stomach to induce a miscarriage. At her request.

The best defense his attorney could conjure was to claim that Gerardo wasn't at fault because the girlfriend, Erica Basoria, age 17, participated by hitting herself as well. Actually, that's not a bad point.

But Erica is going free because she had the right to abort her babies.

Yes, the babies: the two tiny baby boys were named Eric and Gerardo, Jr. . . after their parents. (Lengthy article with full story here.)

The graphic that Feathers McGraw chose for his post,"Through the Looking Glass," at Penguin Proletariat says it all: the Twilight Zone.

Does the "pro-choice" movement really think no one should be held responsible for the death of these two boys? Anyone want to argue that point? The comments are open.

* * *

Links:

Jill Stanek, Pro-life Pulse covers the story, as does The Narrow and a lively discussion over at LaShawn's Corner.

Lee at Right-Thinking from the Left Coast says this case is going all the way to the Supremes, and thinks, maybe, that was the plan.

* * *

WEDNESDAY MORNING UPDATE: Found some willing to argue the other side --

Jessica from NARAL, on the other side of the debate also has thoughts on the Supreme Court and abortion.

Alas (a blog) says that they should have gotten the abortion.

Civil Commotion writes that the boy is innocent because he merely "stepped on his girlfriend's stomach" in Rough Justice

U235 calls the abortion a "miscarry" in More Texas Justice (beware: U235 debates with F-words.)

The Debate Link says that the murder was the only, um, choice in Laws of Intended Consequences

A Typical Joe in The Illusion of Legal Abortion wants to "make our positive arguments and win on the merits. I'm pro-abortion."

Kevin Drum of Washington Monthly, says that "This is the intersection of stupid kids, stupid laws, mendacious legislators, and fanatical prosecutors. It's what happens when states ban access to otherwise legal abortions ..It's like living under the Ayatollahs in Iran. It's simple barbarism."

John Cole at Balloon Juice agrees with Kevin Drum. John says: "I don't care . . .how many of you tell me I have a h**d-on for the Christian Right. With your attitudes on sex, marriage, abortion, and homosexuality, living with some of you is getting harder and harder. This is your vision for America? . . .I guess I am just the anti-Christ that way."

And thanks to Traffic Jam at Outside the Beltway


F**K Patois -- blogging and the Academy

| By Charmaine Yoest

Drunken sailors don't cuss this much. No, you have to be an academic to really sling the slang.

In I Am Charlotte Simmons, Tom Wolfe writes about elite college life. He outlines the popularity of the f-word in its usage as any part of speech. F**K patois. I felt embarrassed for academia when George Bush read the book.

chronicle_of_higher_ed_logo.gif

The recent issue of The Chronicle of Higher Education included the tale of blogging gone bad in the Academy.

In "Academic Flame Wars," the author recounts a pitched battle in his department played out online. (Aside: lest anyone doubt the climate of fear on today's campuses, just watch how often The Chronicle prints articles using pseudonyms. "Alan Mendelsohn is the pseudonym of a doctoral student at a major research university on the West Coast.")

It's meant to be an oh-so-serious examination of the perils of posting. But you just have to laugh. In the midst of quoting posts laced with "f**king" and the a-word, we come to this:

Dave had attacked the way in which Marsha's rhetoric had been "interpellated" by racist discursive formations, not Marsha herself.

It was during the follow-up responses that the term "postmodern wanker" was first used . . .

Now, if Truth be known, or Laid Bear, I have never seen a drunken sailor or heard a co-ed cussing. It might be that my military friends and my students know that such a salty modern language association would make Your Gentle Blogger blush.

But postmodern wanker?? That one might be a keeper.

* * *

UPDATE 11:48 PM: So my Brilliant Brother emails me (at the end of the day!) to ask if I know, exactly, what the term I've called a "keeper" really means. . . "Just wanted to make sure ..." he says. (Yeah, he knows me.) As it turns out, my understanding of the phrase in question was, a little, shall we say, imprecise. oops.

Thanks to muddy boots and clean language at Mudville Gazette Open Post

Required reading at Daniel Drezner where his wit and research deserve multiple citations.

More good jammin' at Traffic Jam on Outside The Beltway

See more more colorful language in class and the professor's blog at Bull by the Horns


Guest Blogger: Go see Cinderella Man. . .

June 6, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

cinderella_man_poster.jpg

Go see Cinderella Man. Quickly. It's a great movie, so says the Chairman in the movie review below. You may beat me there, so please enjoy it doubly.

But it's not just about enjoyment . . . this is, after all "Politics in Real Life" here at Reasoned Audacity, so you knew I was going to sneak in the political subtext. Oh, yes.

The Chairman reports that this is a wonderful movie that celebrates family, doesn't mock people of faith, and is for grown-ups, as well as the coveted teenage boys market. Nice for a change. But according to Box Office Mojo, the movie had a "disappointing" opening:

Director Ron Howard's $88 million Depression-era drama starring Russell Crowe as boxer James J. Braddock got off to a wobbly start, delivering an estimated $18.6 million at 2,812 venues in fourth place.

So those of us who would like Hollywood to make movies that are inspiring and uplifting need to support this one -- we need to send the message that positive, wholesome movies sell theatre tickets.

The following from the Chairman . . .

* * *

“You want to go see what?” I said.
Cinderella Man,” she said.
“But that’s a boxing movie,” I said.
“I know. What time shall I reserve the tickets for?” she said.

Hey, if the birthday girl says she wants to go see a Depression-era boxing movie, I’m gonna take her to see it even if it does star bad boy Russell Crowe who doesn’t do much for me. Well, okay, Gladiator wasn’t bad but . . .

I can’t pinpoint the moment when my reservations about the flick began to fade away. It didn’t have a lot to do with the chemistry between Crowe and Zellweger; she isn’t my cup of tea either. Mostly it had to do with the fact that Crowe played Jim Braddock not as some swaggeringly tough fighter, but as the quintessentially good family man . . . from start to finish . . . without a blemish. This fact alone is probably what allowed me to care about him and his wife and his children.

He made me care because he was just so decent. It left me wondering how a man could be so decent and yet be such a slugger in the ring. He was a ferocious fighter, but I never got the sense that he had any malicious feelings toward his opponents . . . well, maybe Max Baer was the exception.

Boxing was just Braddock’s talent, his profession. Most importantly, it was a means of providing for his family. It never became his life. Braddock’s family was his life.

I understand how his comeback after a year out of the ring earned him the moniker “Cinderella Man,” but given the story told by this movie, it might more aptly have been titled, The Passion of the Family Man. At the outset we are shown how injury and the Depression stripped Braddock of nearly everything: his career, his home, everything but his character and values. We see the family’s desperate fight to survive and stay together during the depression . . . and their decency remains intact when everything else lies in ruin. And we care about them.

I became so gripped by the story that I lost sight of what the actors were doing. The cast was totally believable so they never got in the way of the story — some of the credit for this goes to the director, Ron Howard. I would never have believed that Russell Crowe could have acted the role of Braddock with such a low-keyed, self-effacing dignity.

There are several great scenes in this movie that will always stick with me. But one scene is particularly powerful. On the comeback trail, Braddock is asked by a reporter: “What are you fighting for?”


Continue Reading »

Camo-Ade and Cammy Coke . . .on the Water Buffalo?

| By Charmaine Yoest

Here's "Camo-Ade" from Waco Kid at Penguin Proletariat! Very cool.

powerade.jpg


In this weekend's post, I challenged the executives at Coca-Cola to come up with a way to get some fluids to Major E., stationed at Camp Victory in Baghdad. Specifically, I told them they needed to start a "Camp Victory" campaign, package Powerade and Coke in camouflage, and start shipping it by the crate-load to Iraq. And a Coke dispenser on every water buffalo.

As we sat in the relative comfort of 90 degree heat all day yesterday, watching double-header little league baseball, I kept thinking two things:

First: What does 107 degrees inside a tank feel like? We had a hard time keeping the boys playing baseball hydrated at 90 degrees -- one of my son's teammates actually threw up. (Of course there was also the crushing lead their opponents had on them. . . )

Second: Can you imagine how fast a "Camo-Ade" or "Cammy Coke" would fly off the shelves here at home . . . particularly among the youth athlete market? Watching the Dude and his buddies running around yesterday, with moms and dads pushing fluids at them, I just kept thinking that whoever came up with a patriotic, cammy-packaged drink product wouldn't be able to keep it stocked in the stores. Just the opinion of one mother whose son would eat broccoli if it came in cammy.

Over at Manuever Marketing, they note that this situation is perfect for a small upstart drink manufacturer. . .

Everyone wants to be a "Dogface" today. How do I know? The Wall Street Journal recently reported that respect for the military is now so high that the number of people faking military service with "unauthorized" use of military decorations has increased dramatically.

So issue them Cammy Coke instead!

Of course, it's not too late for Pepsi. I think everything I wrote to Coke could work for Pepsi, too. Steve Robbins wrote to suggest the following for Pepsi:

I would suggest to my friend PepsiCo that the company will need to respond quickly, and it will have to go well beyond a few cases of soda! Personally, I would recommend a visit to the war zone by PepsiCo President and Chief Financial Officer, Indra Nooyi. As a first measure of contrition, she could deliver a plaque to him, bearing Major E's question, and the official answer of the Board, with all appropriate signatures affixed.

Secondly, I believe she and PepsiCo should simultaneously announce the establishment of some form of philanthropic effort on behalf of those brave individuals who have been serving in this war on terror. An educational fund for the children of those soldiers would be one logical possibility, as Indra made her admittedly intemperate remarks at Columbia University.

I can hear the protests already: some will argue that multi-national drink manufacturers wrapping their products in the flag would be hypocritical. Perhaps.

But symbols matter. Our soldiers hear the controversy over the war. Take a minute to read this post by Ma Deuce Gunner, an M2 Gunner serving in Kirkuk, Iraq which ends, "And they say we are the bad guys."

No, they are the good guys. And anything we can do to support them is a good thing.


See also: A great Scott Johnson Powerline response to a New York Times article on the Pepsi controversy.

A salute to MudvilleGazette's Open Post


Memo to Neville Isdell, CEO, Coca-Cola: Major E. is Thirsty!

June 5, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Hey, Coca-Cola: Carpe diem! Seize the Day! Your moment is now! I understand that you don't want to make too unseemly a display of rejoicing at Pepsi's self-immolation, but now is the time to act. I do hate to give away free consulting, but here's what you need to be doing:

coke_ad.jpgMEMORANDUM TO E. NEVILLE ISDELL
Chairman, Board of Directors, and Chief Executive Officer
The Coca-Cola Company

I don't know if anybody at the Coca-Cola Company has noticed, but your number one competitor has been in a bit of hot water lately. We've had a little something to say about the President of PepsiCo, Indra Nooyi's ill-considered speech to Columbia Business School here at Reasoned Audacity.

But you really need to focus in on a story from Powerline (who first broke the Nooyi story) about Major E., an American soldier currently serving in Iraq and stationed at Camp Victory in Baghdad.

Major E. is thirsty. You may have heard: it's hot over there. The temperature forecast for tomorrow is 107 degrees, and over 100 all week long. . . And he works in a tank.

And Major E. is boycotting Pepsi and Gatorade.

The Major wrote to Pepsi (from Powerline) telling them that he was boycotting their products because "I found Ms. Nooyi's graduation comments offensive, not to mention off-base, because the central theme of her speech was that America is, in essence, "flipping off the world."

The good Major asked for a response from Pepsi; what he got was standard boilerplate. Be sure to read an article Scott Johnson of Powerline just wrote for the Daily Standard that lays out a whole series of exchanges between Major E. and Pepsi. Here's an excerpt from his most recent letter to Pepsi:

The question that I have asked since my first communication on this topic is whether PepsiCo agrees with the values that underlie Ms. Nooyi's statement made as the president of PepsiCo, not as a private citizen, since she is the company's president who made the remarks from a prepared text before a high-profile graduate school with media present. In regard to our relations with the rest of the world, does PepsiCo believe that America is "giving the finger," or "lending a hand?"

This is the third time I have asked the question and though it seems quite straightforward, I have yet to receive an answer, only polite responses promising to "forward" my message.

But what really caught my attention -- and should catch yours -- is this excerpted letter from Major E. to Scott Johnson at Powerline, in which he describes a midnight tank patrol:

. . .The temperature stayed in the 80's outside and hovered just over 100 degrees inside the tank. The combination of heat, helmet, and heavy protective gear meant that each time I sat down inside, sweat would begin to stream down my face within a minute or two. The rest of the patrol remained quiet, other than the odd rifle crack. . .

. . .Speaking of thirst, I am still dehydrated from the tank patrol. But since I have given up drinking Pepsi and Gatorade, hopefully only a temporary measure, I am stuck with Kuwait's finest "Abraaj" bottled water, mixed with fruit punch.

Thank you for taking the time to read this, and for all of the support you and your readers give to the troops.

In Christ,
Major E.
Camp Victory

"Other than the odd rifle crack??!" Let me get this straight: This man is serving our country in 100 degree heat. . . in a tank thousands of miles from home . . . and he has to drink "Abraaj" water from Kuwait?

Hello? Coca-Cola?? I seem to recall that you, Coca-Cola, have competitive products for Pepsi and Gatorade. . .

Time to get in gear. Major E. is thirsty. Send him some Powerade and make it snappy!

Here's the free advice. Get your marketing team working overnight to come up with a "Camp Victory" campaign. Redesign the Powerade labeling in a special collector's edition camouflage version. Load the crates up on the plane and get them to Baghdad on the double.

And Mr. Isdell, if I were you, I'd hand the first one out of the crate to Major E. personally.

Get to work guys, it's hot over there.

# # #

BLEG: Hey you Photoshop hotshots -- what would a Powerade in cammy look like? I'd love to see it!

LINKS:

Mudville, Open Post: thanks!


Thank you for linking and for visiting!

June 4, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

instalanche 002.jpg

The Dude and Boo
Keepin' Tabs on the Sitemeter

If you are a new reader, finding your way here through Instapundit, Powerline or Townhall, I want to welcome you. (Thank you Glenn, Scott and Jonathan.) If you are a returning reader, I want to thank you for your support.

Some of you may remember, from when I wrote about becoming a "Marauding Marsupial," (!) that my ten-year-old son, the Dude, has this thing about me catching up to Instapundit. He'll stumble down the stairs in the morning, still sleepy, "So Mom, what's the number?" 'Though he doesn't need me to tell him: he checks the Sitemeter himself. He'll report the numbers to me, complete with my hourly run-rate.

Some time last week, I walked into the office to find him at the computer. I asked him what he was reading, and he startled as if he was looking at porn. . . yes, you guessed it -- Instapundit.

So imagine the excitement around here when The Link hit on Thursday. Then, Friday morning, Powerline and Townhall linked. I walked into the office to find the Dude and his trusty sidekick, Boo, monitoring the situation.

I thank you all for stopping by. I appreciate you! And I am grateful for your comments and support.

So let me know what you think, and do keep coming back. Do it for the Dude!


Welcome Townhall.com Readers

June 3, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Welcome Townhall.com readers. . . if you are looking for the post on Howard Dean and the abortion data, there are actually two of them; click here for both on one page.

Thanks for stopping by.


Arlington National Cemetery, John Wesley Yoest, USN, BMCS

| By Charmaine Yoest

Every time we've made the left turn onto Eisenhower Drive, and passed through the imposing brick gates of Arlington National Cemetery, I've been overwhelmed with emotion. Family members of those buried at Arlington National Cemetery are given a special pass and may drive onto the Hallowed Grounds to visit the grave of their loved one. It's an enormous honor which makes me feel humbled.

posse_at_arlington.jpg

The Penta-Posse
at Arlington National Cemetery

My husband's father served thirty years in the United States Navy, and died the year I married into the family, so I didn't know him well. And the fact is, after a lifetime of nine-month Mediterranean tours, wars, and rumors of war, there is a lot my husband doesn't know as well.

However, over the 15 years that we've been married, I have gotten to know my mother-in-law well. She doesn't talk either about the sacrifices she made, but there is one story that she has told me several times.

Once, when my father-in-law was out on tour, and she was home with three small children, the car broke down and, of course, she had to take care of it. My husband marched up and said, "Don't worry, Mom, I'll fix it." He was about five years old at the time.

My mother-in-law laughs. . . the little man, takin' care of things. But it makes me cry.

We owe a lot to our military families.

When we visited Arlington this past week, we passed at least three funeral ceremonies on the way to Section 64. I lost track of the fresh graves and the still-standing tents, either just vacated by other grieving families, or awaiting the afternoon's fresh, raw sorrow.

As we pulled up on Bradley Avenue, an Air Force honor guard was marching precisely back to their bus after a ceremony for an airman who had been a POW in Korea. While we searched for my father-in-law's headstone, an empty horse-drawn caisson lumbered past, and settled briefly in the shade nearby, awaiting their next assignment. . .

mom_dad_uniform.jpg

We found my father-in-law's headstone: The front has the Christian Cross with the old Chief's Curriculum Vita. Chief Yoest cut high school to catch World War II. He retired with rows of ribbons and a "v" device, and pinned butterbars on his boy. He now has a grandson, The Dude, who bears his name and wants to be a Navy pilot.

The reverse of the stone is blank, awaiting the inscripton for Chief Yoest's high school sweetheart, his wife, Jack's mom, "Babcia" (Polish for Grandmother), who is still with us. In the end, they will be buried together, an honor she earned.

As we turned to go, the Diva took her jingle-bell necklace from around her neck, and left it on the headstone. A fitting tribute for a warrior.

jingle_bell.jpg

Sailors, rest your oars.

We drove back down Bradley Avenue -- past a fresh grave covered by a tarp. In front of us, sparkling in the bright sunlight of a gorgeous day, stretched row after row of white marble markers, orderly, peaceful, some weathered, others new and crisply chiseled . . .

I turned to the Penta-Posse. "I want you to look," I said. "I want you to understand, that each one of these headstones represents someone who gave their life so that you could be free."

They were quiet and solemn. The weight of it is beyond measure.

The Dreamer said, "Don't cry, Mom."

We made the right turn onto Eisenhower. We drove slowly toward the exit, passing the drive to the Tomb of the Unknowns to our left, until we came to a crosswalk thronged with tourists. The guard on duty motioned to the crowd to stop, and we drove through, passing through the gates, back to a busy day, leaving behind -- the curious crowds, the chattering school children. . . and the silent stones.

Other Memorial Day Links:
Blackfive with "Opening the Gates of Heaven."
Intel Dump

Marine Corps Moms

LaShawn Barber's Corner

See Traffic Jam


The European Finger . . . Dutch Vote Nee! : Why We Should Care

June 2, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Should Americans care about the vote to ratify a Constitution for the European Union? Following Monday's "non" vote from the French, the 16 million Dutch voted NO yesterday, with a resounding 62 percent rejecting the proposed EU charter.

eu_flag_.jpg

European Union Flag
Dutch and French say Nee et Non

Should we care? It's a very interesting development for political scientists, but how 'bout for real-world Americans?

The answer, surprisingly, comes from: Indra Nooyi, President of PepsiCo. In her speech to Columbia University where she compared the world to a hand, and the United States to the middle finger, Nooyi told us that the index finger, the European Finger, points the way:

Our index, or pointer finger, is Europe. Europe is the cradle of democracy and pointed the way for western civilization and the laws we use in conducting global business.

There is an attitude, among the international intellectual elite, that Europe does point the way. I use the word "international" elite deliberately: it's not just Europeans; it's not just Indra Nooyi. There are those among the American elite who would like us to move toward a more "multilateral" approach, adopting a more deferential stance toward international opinion and mores -- but most troubling, international law as well.

In an essential article in the Winter 2004 issue of the Public Interest, "Multilateralism Comes to the Courts," Ken Kersch, of Princeton, lays out in exquisite detail the movement among many American legal scholars to establish international norms and treaties in authority over domestic sovereignty. (The link goes to the Public Interest home page; to access the article, navigate to Winter 2004 through the "Archives" link.) Kersch's quotes from scholars like Peter Singer of Princeton, author of One World (and infanticide advocate) and Martha Nussbaum of University of Chicago, and Rogers Smith of University of Pennsylvania, are troubling. But it is his citations of "cosmopolitan" attitudes among our sitting Supreme Court Justices that are particularly noteworthy:

In Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (joined by Justice Stephen Breyer) cited both the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (which the United States has ratified) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (which it has not) as evidence of an “international understanding of the office of affirmative action.” In Justice Ginsburg’s view, these international conventions provide the grounds for “temporary special measures aimed at accelerating de facto equality.” (Bold emphasis mine.)

In Lawrence v. Texas, Justice Anthony Kennedy prominently recurred to a friend-of-the-Court brief on foreign law and court decisions filed by Mary Robinson, the former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, and to a key decision of the European Court of Human Rights.

(See here for my article about sovereignty concerns related to CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.)

But a funny thing happened on the way to the (legal) forum -- the subtext about yesterday's vote: the European Finger seems to have a wrist below -- the (pesky) people -- turning the hand in another direction. That's the populous uncertainty with a referendum, a democracy. . . it's called a vote.

The intellectual elite -- whether they be the American, European, or UN variety -- don't seem to understand the central importance to "We The People" of national identity. Or, more precisely, they don't care. But that is a strategic miscalculation: they fail to appreciate the cohesive power that identification produces.

Nee et Non. Now they have to care.

LINKS:

Welcome Instapundit readers. See Glenn's analysis of the vote here.

John at Powerline has two good posts on the EU votes, here and here.

Also see what King at SCSU Scholars says about the EU vote more generally (Cool graphs at his site.)


Delusions from the Kos Kids

| By Charmaine Yoest

This is how much they hate President Bush. Jaw-dropping. . . and laughable. From the kiddos over at Daily Kos:

Bush just publicly committed an impeachable offense


From An Atheist Soldier (not alone in his foxhole)(at least not here) via Mrs. Greyhawk's Dawn Patrol. . . (great work: don't know how she does it all!)


Combat Action Badge, Unisex Design

June 1, 2005 | By Charmaine Yoest

Army Chief of Staff, General Schoomaker, Peter, J., has unveiled the design of the new Combat Action Badge, according to Military.com. It is a bayonet and hand grenade on a wreath.

The real significance of this new badge is that women are now eligible, too.

cab_image.jpg

New Combat Action Badge

If Google searches leading to this blog are any indication, the award is much anticipated.

"Warfare is still a human endeavor," Schoomaker, Peter, J. reports. "Our intent is to recognize Soldiers who demonstrate and live the Warrior Ethos."

And women are now "classified" as warriors as Schoomaker deliberately places women in combat after Congress went French on us and surrendered (without firing a shot) in a recent effort to address the issue.

President Bush has stated that women will not be placed in combat; Congress has stated that women will not be placed in combat.

Too bad. The Army says differently. And now, they get a Combat Action Badge to prove it.

(What's next? We voted "non;" the Army elites say "oui." The US Army thinks like the EU . . .)

The boiled frog strategy is rolling along . . . And they wonder why their male recruiting numbers are down??

LINKS:

Can't tell if he'll agree with me on the unisex issue, but Watch Your Six says "we don't need no stinkin' badges" for another reason. . .

Mudville, Open Post -- (gosh, Greyhawk, did TCOverride survive the live grenade??!)

And Outside the Beltway, Traffic Jam.

See PatriotVoices


Jack Yoest

Jack Yoest Read More »

Charmaine Yoest

Charmaine Yoest Read More »

My title page contents

Subscribe

Click here to Subscribe to Reasoned Audacity's RSS Feed:
RSS feed

Or enter your email address:
My title page contents Visit

Management Training Upcoming events


Washington, DC

Arlington, VA
Aug 6 Chicago Nat'l Assoc of Comm Col Entrepre October 11

Accolades





View Jack Yoest's profile on LinkedIn

Reasoned Audacity Supports




Prev | List | Random | Next
Join Powered by RingSurf!

Extra

Sex Trafficking PPT

Sotomayor411.com

Arlington Chamber of Commerce

Maximum Effect


"Achieve maximum effect
by exhibiting
Reasoned Audacity."
- Ranger Handbook

The Cotillion


Blue Star



Categories

Blogroll



Blogroll Me! http://rpc.blogrolling.com/rss.php?r=306e77ed834ed3b832c6638a9f2d3f57
shadow

Blogroll



Blogroll Me! http://rpc.blogrolling.com/rss.php?r=306e77ed834ed3b832c6638a9f2d3f57

Blogroll



Blogroll Me!
shadow