« Karen Hughes Is Always On Time With President Bush | Main | Carnival of Cinema Is Up at Nehring the Edge »

Looking For A Job...With Tattoos?

October 19, 2006 | By Jack Yoest

Our US Army is getting more recruits with tattoos. And so are you.

A third of the population 18 to 29 has a tattoo. Your Business Blogger is a bit outside this age range and our five-kid penta-posse has not yet demanded needles with ink. But this is an exploding fad that will affect business hiring.

body_piercing_tools_gothamworld_yoest.jpg

Body Piercing
Tools of the Trade
courtesy: Gotham
Here I will review only the deliberate body modifications. Not the accidental. (Scars are tattoos with better stories.)

We just hired a number of employees. Not one of the attractive young women had any body art. That I noticed. Not that I was looking.

My concern is less with my outdated preferences than that potential candidates knew my preferences. If I control cutting the check, I'll control the body cutting. I'd like some input in what peeps I be hangin' wit'.

I prefer non-smokers with no (visible) body art. Conjugated verbs are a plus.

Job seekers must remember that symmetry and chemistry between interview-er and interview-ee is what gets hired. It is not fair. But remember, I'm writing the check.

So tattoos and other self-mutilations are not for me. And it's not likely that I would hire such decorations. But one of my managers with hiring authority might. One of my clients might. But not me.

(And please don't ask me about trans-gender: If you take a meat cleaver to your manhood, there would probably not be a fit between us. Because you would be crazy.)

And I'm not the only fuddy-duddie. The Vault reports,

Companies with dress and grooming codes are on the strongest legal grounds when they defend their policies based on legitimate business reasons.


At Starbucks, "baristas" who serve the $5 lattes can't display any tattoos or wear any piercing jewelry besides small, matched pair earrings. Each ear can't have more than two piercings. Serving upscale coffee demands upscale workers, according to Starbucks, and tattoos don't fit that scheme.

So what's right? What is wrong with tattoos?

Sometime ago I questioned my Rabbi, Daniel Lapin, on the issue of tattoos. Yes, I'm Presbyterian who sits at the feet of the JollyBogger. But everyone also needs a Rabbi; a teacher. Your coach doesn't have to be faith-based. But the "donations" can be tax deductible...

My Rabbi said that ancient Jewish tradition held that a person's body does not belong to him; it belongs to the Creator and we borrow this earthly vessel for a while. Which is why the tattooing of identification numbers during the Holocaust was so humiliating to the Jews.

So if I interview you, or some other old codger interviews you, don't tell us about your tattoos. It is not part of the job description.

You will be hired for your wisdom and your judgment.

###

Was this helpful? Do comment.
Consider a free eMail subscription or RSS for this site.


Comments

conjugated verbs. . .very funny!

I know a transgender... very good friend of mine. You shouldn't judge them collectively like that.

Suricou, Thank you for your comment about your transgender friend.

I have crazy friends, too.

The old Scotish phrase,
Don't cut off your nose
to spite your face,
Still holds today.
To part with your pen!s
is the meanest.

Thank you for your comment

Jack

Thats the best you can do? Recite a silly rhyme to me? Perhaps you should have tried thinking up some form of reasoned arguement instead, or at least tried to find some statistics to support your claim.

Even then though, you cant get past my basic no-broad-brushes princible. I know a transsexual: She is not crazy. She holds a job, chats online, and sometimes writes letters to a newspaper in reply to people like you. Therefor, not all transsexual people are crazy. As transsexual is a subcatagory of transgender, this implies that not all transgender people are crazy.

Besides, its not in the Big Book of Crazy, the DSM.

Ever consider that not everyone is going to be a corporate chimp or restaurant fuel?

Further reading: http://www.tao-of-tattoos.com

I, too, would question the judgment of someone who would make permanent marks on his or her body (or deface it in any other way, as in cutting off an essential part of it).

I have spent most of my career in the corporate world. Visible tattooing and piercing seems to be a "screw you" statement to the world. At best, it is mindless fashion following. That's fine if that's what you want to do -- but you need a trust fund behind you or a lot of musical talent.

If you want a corporate job (not that everyone does), then you need to meet certain grooming standards. The only men who had beards where I worked were the ones who were so good at their jobs that they were pretty much irreplaceable.

If you're not that good, well, then, you need to play by the rules.

Chances are, more people have tats or piercings than you know. I am the HR Manager for a leading interactive advertising agency and I have both. Some of the most creative people in the world (and not just rock stars) have body art. I would hate to think we live in a world where you are shunned and made to be an outsider because of your personal choices about your body. Does that mean that if you were to find out a female candidate had a legal abortion and was completely qualified for the position, you wouldn't hire her? If so, prepare for court. Just my two cents.

I'm not sure what abortion has to do with this.

What I am talking about is about the impression someone makes in a conservative corporate environment. If you have nothing behind you but your resume and you are competing with other candidates for a job, you don't need anything to put the recruiter off. Visible tattoos and face piercings are probably not going to be a plus for most corporate recruiters, at least not for white-collar jobs. You can't wear jewelry if you're working on a factory line, so I guess the piercings could be overlooked for production jobs as they could just be removed.

Let me ask you this -- if you were on trial for murder and could pick a lawyer only by looks -- yes, an extreme hypothetical, I know -- which one would you pick -- the clean-shaven one in the conservative suit and tie or the one in jeans and a t-shirt with the piercings and tattoos?

People judge by appearances until they have more information. And you don't always get a chance to get more information.

I am not saying people with tattoos and piercings are bad or good. I am just saying that some people perceive them a certain way. For people of my generation, tattoos mean you were in prison or just generally low class. They are not something anyone would do as a fashion statement.

And that, CF, is the whole point. Isn't that what we'd like to stray away from? Judging people by how they look? Would you rather pick a lawyer who wore a suit and went to KMart Law School, or the one in jeans who went to Harvard and graduated top of his class. Don't judge a book by its cover, people are deeper than they appear.

And if your response is "well, but that's the way people ARE, so we have to live that way" I say BE the change you want to see in the world. I know I certainly will.

Transgendered individuals are among the most frequently targeted people in our society due to the overwhelming degree of ignorance regarding the topic. Referring to 'male' to female transsexuals with male pronouns is extremely disrepectful and merely serves to communicate narrowness of thought and an utter lack of empathy and intelligence.

Katherine, You are certainly right: I do not want to know any more trannys' etiquette. Or is it transgenders; transsexuals, trannies?

Goodness, normal people have enough trouble with politeness with other typical humans, let alone gender transformationals as a result of elective surgery.

And you are also right about the pro-nouns. What pre-fix does the trans-whatever want?

I had enough trouble with some women going from Miss to Ms.

How about a unique greeting for this, well, unique population. Men have Mister. Women have Missus. Trannies should have their own pre-fix:

Trans-fix.

Dr. Yoest, meet TF Gibson. TF can be uses as an all purpose salutation for the male-female-male and any AC/DC combo. The trannies can now have their own honorific.

Does this indicate a lack of understanding indicate a lack of intelligence? Perhaps. Maybe my Mensa invitation was wrong...

Dunno about the empathy part either. These poor sinners do have my sympathy.

Thank you for commenting,

Jack

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)





Jack Yoest

Jack Yoest Read More »

Charmaine Yoest

Charmaine Yoest Read More »

Subscribe

Click here to Subscribe to Reasoned Audacity's RSS Feed:
RSS feed

Or enter your email address:
Visit

Management Training Upcoming events


Washington, DC

Baltimore, MD

Accolades





View Jack Yoest's profile on LinkedIn

Reasoned Audacity Supports




Prev | List | Random | Next
Join Powered by RingSurf!

Extra

Sex Trafficking PPT

Arlington Chamber of Commerce

Maximum Effect


"Achieve maximum effect
by exhibiting
Reasoned Audacity."
- Ranger Handbook

The Cotillion


Blue Star



Categories

Blogroll



Blogroll Me!

shadow
shadow