Charmaine Debates Taxpayer Funding of Abortion on FOX

July 16, 2010 | By Jack Yoest



Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.,
Happy Warrior; Winsome Argument
Charmaine appeared on FOX today, Friday 16 July to debate against tax payer funding for abortion.

Charmaine taped this morning and the piece aired throughout the day. (Normally, ProLife talent should not tape - liberal media will use editorial-editing to win a debate. But FOX is, well, fair and balanced.)

Please let us know what you think.

Why you should watch.

No, not to check out Charmaine's new hair cut and make-up. FOX in DC is expanding their make-up room next to the green room and the surface preparation was a bit rushed.

No. A viewer -- especially those leaning toward abortion -- should watch to learn why the ProLife position is winning in America; where 51 percent now self identify with Life.

Why?

Three reasons:

1) A compelling argument.
2) A winsome argument.
3) A healthy argument.

A compelling argument. Every picture tells a story, as Rod Stewart would say and every gif-jpg file is worth a thousand words. The science of the sono-gram has shifted the debate from the mother to the child. 85 percent of women who see Baby's First Picture choose to let the baby live.

This is why Cecile Richards at Planned Parenthood fights this scientific advancement. Too much information would change a woman's choice. Science has not been good for abortion.

ProChoiceGal tweets "fetuses are humans. However, that doesn't mean that pregnant women shouldn't get basic human rights." Re: abortion choice. Which brings us to,

Charmaine and Senator Orrin Hatch
charmaine_yoest_Senator_hatch_2010.jpgA winsome argument. We in the Pro-Life movement are in the persuasion business. The Alert Reader knows that Your Business Blogger(R) teaches Sales and Marketing at the local college and has researched and taught how Pro-Life sells.

Over the years, we have shaken hands with nearly every pro-choice leader from Betty Friedan to Gloria Steinem to Margaret Sanger's grandson, Alexander Sanger. They were not the happy people as one might expect and did not advance a positive, enjoyable debate. They do not smile. (Steinem has now married; I think she may have smiled since the honeymoon.) That's why Charmaine's Pro-Life message is selling so well: She smiles. A Happy Warrior. Who Wins.

The unfortunate Twitterer MsFetus makes as bitter a presentation as Eleanor Smeal (understand the subjective evaluation-not the person: the presentation). The first rule in debating is "whoever shouts or goes ad hominem loses." The pro-abortion advocates are reduced to cussing in Caps Lock. They have lost.

UK Pro-Choice QueenCatherinex tweets, "In my personal opinion I wouldn't call a zygote, embryo, then fetus a baby. So it's not a case of dehumanising, it's biology." No, it's not biology--it's marketing: See your Baby; the Baby lives. Word descriptors-pictures are powerful.

Finally, the picture of health,

A healthy argument. Charmaine runs Americans United for Life, a public interest law firm. Her team of legal eagles has noted that the debate has moved from Roe v Wade. The Burger court wrote that the state has a compelling interest in the baby in the third trimester, but this was soon superseded by the health of the mother "exceptions." Subsequent rulings have now asserted that abortion must remain legal on the "reliance" interpretation, where the mother's financial health must be preserved as well as the perceived physical well-being.

(Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D., as a case study, would refute this. She didn't need abortion to become a President and CEO.)

But we have come back full circle to the mother's health. Science is now telling us that abortion is a crushing psychological burden where women are now stating--in public--that they now regret.

Studies also demonstrate that abortion removes protections allowing women to have a higher risk of breast cancer.

Women are regretting and re-thinking thinking their abortions. Harms to women will be the next foundation in the future of the abortion debate.

###

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.

Thank you (foot)notes,

Watch Charmaine's Expert Testimony to the Judiciary Committee on the Kagan Nomination

Watch Charmaine's Expert Testimony to the Judiciary Committee on the Sotomayor Nomination


Media Alert: Charmaine Yoest on FOX Debating Tax Payers & Abortion

| By Jack Yoest

Charmaine_Yoest_pubshot_2010.jpgCharmaine will be appearing on FOX today, Friday 16 July to debate against tax payer funding for abortion.

The tax and abort position will be argued by National Partnership for Women and Family.

Charmaine Yoest

Charmaine taped this morning and the piece will be aired throughout the day. (Normally, ProLife talent should not tape - liberal media will use editorial-editing to win a debate. But FOX is, well, fair and balanced.)

Please let us know what you think.

Why you should watch.

No, not to check out Charmaine's new hair cut and make-up. FOX in DC is expanding their make-up room next to the green room and the surface preparation was a bit rushed.

No. A viewer -- especially those leaning toward abortion -- should watch to learn why the ProLife position is winning in America; where 51 percent now self identify with Life.

Why?

Three reasons:

1) A compelling argument.

2) A winsome argument.

3) A healthy argument.

A compelling argument. Every picture tells a story, as Rod Stewart would say and every gif file is worth a thousand words. The science of the sono-gram has shifted the debate from the mother to the child. 85 percent of women who see Baby's First Picture choose to let the baby live. This is why Cecile Richards at Planned Parenthood fights this scientific advancement. Too much information would change a woman's choice. Science has not been good for abortion.

ProChoiceGal tweets "fetuses are humans. However, that doesn't mean that pregnant women shouldn't get basic human rights." Re: abortion choice. Which brings us to,

Charmaine and Senator Orrin Hatch
charmaine_yoest_Senator_hatch_2010.jpgA winsome argument. We in the Pro-Life movement are in the persuasion business. The Alert Reader knows that Your Business Blogger(R) teaches Sales and Marketing at the local college. Pro-Life sells. Over the years, we have shaken hands with nearly every pro-choice leader from Betty Friedan to Gloria Steinem to Margaret Sanger's grandson, Alexander Sanger. They were not happy people as one might expect and did not advance a positive, enjoyable debate. They do not smile. (Steinem has now married; I think she may have smiled since the honeymoon.) That's why Charmaine's Pro-Life message is selling so well: She smiles.

The unfortunate Twitterer MsFetus makes as bitter a presentation as Eleanor Smeal (understand the subjective evaluation-not the person: the presentation). The first rule in debating is "whoever shouts or goes ad hominem loses." The pro-abortion advocates are reduced to cussing in Caps Lock. They have lost.

UK Pro-Choice QueenCatherinex tweets, "In my personal opinion I wouldn't call a zygote, embryo, then fetus a baby. So it's not a case of dehumanising, it's biology." No, it's not biology--it's marketing: See your Baby; the Baby lives. Word pictures are powerful.

Finally, the picture of health,

A healthy argument. Charmaine runs Americans United for Life, a public interest law firm. Her team of legal eagles knows well that the debate has moved from Roe v Wade. The Burger court wrote that the state has a compelling interest in the baby in the third trimester, but this was soon superseded by the health of the mother "exceptions." Subsequent rulings have now asserted that abortion must remain legal on the "reliance" interpretation, where the mother's financial health must be preserved as well as the perceived physical well-being.

(Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D., as a case study, would refute this. She didn't need abortion to become a President and CEO.)

But we have come back to the mother's health. Science is now telling us that abortion is a crushing psychological burden where women are now stating--in public--that they regret.

New studies demonstrate that abortion removes protections making women at higher risk of breast cancer.

Women are regretting and re-thinking thinking their abortions. Harms to women will be the next foundation in the future of the abortion debate.

###

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.

Thank you (foot)notes,

Watch Charmaine's Expert Testimony to the Judiciary Committee on the Kagan Nomination

Watch Charmaine's Expert Testimony to the Judiciary Committee on the Sotomayor Nomination


Abortion Tax About To Become Law,
Americans United for Life,
Protecting Life In Law

December 31, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

cash_for_kids_abortion_mandate.jpg

Cash for Kids
Don't Like Abortion?
Don't Have One.

Pro-Choice Bumper Sticker

Like abortion or not, soon we may all have to pay for them.

Down baby?
"It's Girl, but I want a boy."
Bad Hair Day?

Whatever the reason abortion is legal.

Now Pro-Lifers will fund abortions. (A simple follow-on tax: we already fund Planned Parenthood offices with our tax dollars.)

Charmaine sends this along,

Dear Friend of Life,

They did it. On Christmas Eve, the Senate pushed through the largest expansion of federally-funded abortion since Roe v. Wade. This reckless bill will subsidize insurance plans that cover elective abortions - and your tax dollars will be paying for it.

Americans United for Life is fighting back against taxpayer-funded abortions. Will you stand with us against Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Planned Parenthood by making a year-end, tax-deductible contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more?

The taking of innocent life is indefensible, and now they want to force you to pay for it. Your tax dollars should never be used to pay for abortions.

For the first time in history, this irresponsible bill actually imposes a mandatory abortion tax on unwilling Americans. Even if you never intend to have an abortion, this bill forces you to pay for elective abortion coverage with your tax dollars! However there is still time to prevent this tragedy.

Please help us fight back against taxpayer-funded abortions with an urgently needed year-end, tax-deductible contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more. I'm counting on your financial support so we can continue our life-saving work today.

We urgently need you to stand with us and the millions of pro-life Americans who will be funding abortions every time we pay our federal income taxes. The pro-abortion forces and their supporters in Congress have been emboldened by this government takeover of health care. They are rolling back decades of pro-life law and will not stop. As we enter the New Year, we will continue to stand for the cause of life and against these pro-abortion forces that are on the march.

Yours for Life,
For Life,
Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
Americans United for Life

P.S. This is your last chance to make a year-end, tax-deductible contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more. Every dollar of your generous donation is 100% tax-deductible.

With your support, we'll continue working to ensure that your tax dollars are never used to pay for abortions.


655 15th St NW | Ste 410 | Washington, DC 20005

310 S Peoria Street | Ste 500 | Chicago, IL 60607

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Tell NARAL How Abortion Harms Women

December 28, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

cash_for_kids_abortion_mandate.jpg

Cash for Kids
Our liberal friends at the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) want women's stories on abortion. Click here to read their abortion agenda and click here to tell your story.

I did. Our first child miscarried (spontaneous "abortion"). Charmaine and I were a mess. We cannot image how much an elective abortion would hurt.

Many women who choose abortion -- and even those who don't -- will remember the "birthday" of the aborted baby. And pain of abortion choice torments for decades.

Abortion hurts the woman and her baby.

***

Charmaine sends this note along to the good-guys.

Dear Friend of Life,

Congress is on the verge of authorizing the greatest single expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade - and your tax dollars will be paying for it.

For years, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and their pro-abortion allies have been quietly developing a formidable grassroots army. In its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood's Action Network claims to have recruited "more than 200,000 new supporters," with "affiliates [that] reach every corner of America." Planned Parenthood has also been amassing a considerable "war chest" to spread its pro-abortion message to vulnerable Americans. Last year, it reported a $1 billion budget and a profit of $85 million!

Americans United for Life cannot hope to raise that kind of money within the next few months, but we do need to raise enough to get our life-saving message out to the public. Will you help us ramp up our year-end efforts with your generous tax-deductible contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more to Americans United for Life?

I recently looked at Planned Parenthood's annual report and financial summary - and you wouldn't believe what I saw. In 2007, Planned Parenthood-affiliated "health centers" provided 305,310 abortions - but only 4,912 adoption referrals! It's not hard to figure out where Planned Parenthood's priorities lie. Make no mistake about it - the pro-abortion movement is an aggressive army, and it is on the march across the nation.

Americans United for Life needs significant funds to combat this pro-abortion momentum. Will you help us ramp up our year-end fight with your tax-deductible contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more to Americans United for Life?

For Life,
Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
Americans United for Life

P.S. Every dollar of your year-end contribution of $50, $100, $250 or more is 100% tax-deductible. Your tax dollars should never pay for abortions, and it is only thanks to your financial support that we are able to continue to defend human life every single day. Thank you for your investment in life.

Washington, DC: 655 15th St NW | Ste 410 | Washington, DC 20005

Chicago: 310 S Peoria Street | Ste 500 | Chicago, IL 60607



###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

NARAL is a marketing machine. Alert Readers will remember that NARAL was known once as the National ABORTION Rights Action League. "ABORTION" does not sell. This follows the example of KFC. Where Kentucky FRIED Chicken decided to minimize "FRIED."

"Abortion" and "Fried." Neither are good for people...

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Insurance and Pre-Existing Conditions

December 24, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Merry Christmas.

NSFW

Politically Incorrect. At the Yoest house this morning we are getting reading for the health care vote -- getting ready to watch government run amuck.

The Senators are advancing the health care bill that covers pre-existing conditions. This is not insurance.

Insurance is the management and calculating for risk. Covering and paying for pre-existing conditions is not insurance -- it is charity. Once an adverse health condition is known there is no risk to manage and insurance companies do not need to be involved. The care of the currently sick is the job of health care providers and can be paid and provided for by philanthropy.

Not the insurance companies. Not the taxpayer.

To be precise, if ObamaCare demands to cover pre-existing conditions, then Pelosi-Reid should should remove insurance companies as middle man and force the taxpayers to fund the unfortunate, unwilling and unknowing directly. But.

But this would be charity. Such philanthropy is not the purpose of government. Charity is a test of the human heart -- not government coercion. And worse:

The Senate will force taxpayers to pay for abortions through insurance companies -- pre-existing or not.

The Senate has confused Health Insurance with Health Care.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Americans United for Life does not take a position on insurance or the insurance industry. AUL is a law firm concerned with protecting Life-at conception, abortion and rights of conscience. AUL and AUL Action opposes abortion and its public funding as written in the Senate's current proposed legislation. The opinion here is from Jack Yoest and no other.

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Healthcare Vote and Christmas Wishes
from Americans United for Life

| By Jack Yoest

yoest_family_dc_supreme_court_2009.jpg

The Yoest family at
the Supreme Court in DC

Charmaine sends this note along,

Dear Friend of Life,

I wanted to take a break from public policy and wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas.

And yet, even as I write this, the television in my office is tuned to C-SPAN as pro-abortion Senators stand on the Senate floor - Senator Patty Murray just finished and now Senator Al Franken is beginning - two days before Christmas, they are arguing for the passage of the greatest single expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade. It's simply breathtaking.

My family had dinner last night with my brother and his family, who are here from Alabama to celebrate Christmas with us. Yesterday was also his birthday. As we ate birthday cake, we talked about the strong pull everyone feels to break away and just have Christmas.

But tomorrow morning at 8 am, on Christmas Eve, the Senate will vote. We are paying attention because we must. This is an historic moment and we are honored to be a part of the Life movement that is working to stop this tragedy.

I want to thank you. Frankly, I thought Senator Reid's strategy to push this legislation through at Christmas-time was appalling, but shrewd. Pro-life Americans are rightly paying attention to family and friends and sacred traditions this week. But you've also taken the time to stand with us against this pro-abortion bill.

Thank you!

I also want to thank the AUL team. They've been putting in long hours - our legal team worked through the weekend to analyze Senator Reid's amendment. Their analysis documented that the "compromise" worked out with Senator Nelson actually established the first-ever mandatory abortion tax. Our communications team has been working to get the word out - releasing a statement immediately after the 1 AM vote Monday morning. . . and our database guru, Stanley Bao, is working hard today to get this message to you. I'm privileged to work with a team of people so dedicated to the mission of defending life.

Last weekend, as Reid filed his amendment, it seemed as if even the heavens had opened up in protest, as a blizzard socked in the Nation's Capital. Dedicated pro-life Hill staffers slept on cots and sofas in their offices over the weekend to work against this unprecedented expansion of abortion.

Having a Christmas blizzard reminded me of the classic story of General George Washington's Christmas prayer at Valley Forge. In December of 1777, Washington moved the Continental Army to Valley Forge in order to try to survive the hard winter. You know the story I'm sure: the winter was so desperate and conditions so severe, that of the 12,000 men who began that encampment with Washington, 2,000 did not survive.

There is a story that General Washington was observed at prayer, alone in the woods that Christmas, and a famous painting depicting that scene is now hanging on display at Mount Vernon.

While we may never know the exact details of that prayer, this much is beyond dispute: Washington and his men remained faithful to their cause throughout that long winter. They endured, even when a path to victory was unclear and the future appeared hopeless.

May we too stand firm in the great calling of our time: Defending Life.

Merry Christmas, friends.
Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg
Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO

Washington, DC: 655 15th St NW, Ste. 410 | Washington, DC 20005

Chicago: 310 S. Peoria Street, Ste. 500 | Chicago, IL 60607


Please support Americans United for Life.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Americans United for Life Offers
Urgent Legal Briefing for Senator Nelson

December 23, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

eshot.JPG

Merry Christmas. Charmaine with Jack and
The Penta-Posse in her DC office

Senator Ben Nelson (D) of Nebraska doesn't seem to fully understand that your tax dollars will go into the US Treasury and can come out as abortions.

Senator Dr. Tom Coburn noted an analogy: Just as taxpayer dollars go into the Treasury and come out as Social Security, all taxpayer funds are co-mingled and fungible.

To help clarify the cash flow, Charmaine sent this letter to Senator Nelson

Americans United for Life Offers Urgent Legal Briefing for Senator Nelson

AUL Legal Team Documents Reveal Details on Mandatory Abortion Tax

WASHINGTON, Dec. 22 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- At 4:45 pm today on the floor of the United States Senate, Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska made the following statement:

"...even though they [pro-life advocates] cannot constructively point out how it doesn't prohibit the use of federal funds or wall off those funds or keep them totally segregated. They just didn't like the language..."

As a result of this statement, Dr. Charmaine Yoest, President of Americans United for Life, directed her legal team to contact the Senator's office and offer to provide an urgent briefing to clarify the facts about abortion provisions in the bill. In addition, she has issued this statement:


Senator Nelson has a strong, consistent pro-life voting record, and his vote for the manager's amendment was a surprise to all of us.

We have contacted his office and have offered to send our top legal team to fully brief him as soon as he has an opportunity. I believe it is absolutely critical that Senator Nelson has all of the facts before he casts his final vote on Christmas Eve.

The facts demonstrate that this bill will create the largest single expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade and impose a first-ever abortion tax on the American people.

As of this posting, Nelson's office has not agreed to meet with the AUL legal eagles, standing by even over these Christmas holidays. The Senator has been a bit busy with constituent concerns.

FOR THE FACTS, CLICK BELOW

http://blog.aul.org/2009/12/20/the-abortion-tax-and-other-problems-in-senator-reid%E2%80%99s-amendment/

http://blog.aul.org/2009/12/19/legal-analysis-of-life-concerns-in-managers-amendment/

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Michelle Malkin has More Nebraska voters call out Cornhuckster Ben Nelson

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


The Abortion Tax: Pay It Or To Jail

December 22, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

pro-life_march_yoest_DC_1990001.jpg

Charmaine and Jack
on the DC Mall marching for
Life summer 1990

Years from now your children's children will gather at your feet as you sit in your rocker by the fire.

"Grandpa," They will ask, "What did you do in the abortion wars?"

You will look off, with a small smile, "I fought for Life..."

***

Charmaine sends this along to some 500,000 of her closest friends. If you wish to join this small, intimate tribe of pro-life warriors in the abortion war sign-up here. Americans United for Life is the legal arm of the pro-life movement.

New Senate "Deal" = a $12 Abortion Tax on Unwilling Americans

Dear Friend,

It was just after 1 AM this morning when the US Senate voted to proceed with a massive takeover of health care that will result in a new mandatory 'abortion tax' on people across America.

As you may know, the new health care bill will create new government "exchanges" where individuals and employers can shop for health care plans. Many of these plans will cover abortions and those plans will be subsidized with taxpayer funds for the first time in American history.

This will create the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade, and you will be forced to pay for it.

So what's next? There will be a series of votes on this bill over the next several days culminating with a final vote expected at about 7pm on Christmas Eve. Please continue to call or email your Senators about this health care bill. Since many of them will be in your home state during the next week, a personal visit would be even better.

Remember, even if the Senate does pass the bill on Christmas Eve, the fight isn't over yet.

After the first of the year, the Senate and House will have to go to conference committee and work out the differences between the two different bills each chamber has passed. Once a final version is produced, it must be passed again in both the House and Senate before it can go to the President's desk for signature. Click here to get the details.

We will draw a final line in the sand, and together we can still defeat this bill.

Like you, for weeks now I've been looking forward to spending these next few days with my husband Jack, our five children, and many other family members. But we will not stand aside while the fight for life continues. Thank you for everything you have done so far and for standing with us in the days ahead.

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg

charmaine_signature.jpg

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO

P.S. Pro-abortion special interests and their members of Congress are rolling back pro-life laws that have been in place for decades! Americans United for Life needs the resources to combat the pro-abortion forces in the coming weeks and months. Please make your tax deductible contribution now before the end of the year by following this link. It is only thanks to your financial support we are able to continue to defend human life every single day. Thank you for your partnership.


Washington, DC: 655 15th St NW, Ste. 410 | Washington, DC 20005
Chicago: 310 S. Peoria Street, Ste. 500 | Chicago, IL 60607

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Splitting the Baby in Half?
Americans United for Life Statement on Cloture

December 21, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

You'd think there'd be parking in Your Nation's Capital in the dead of night.

You'd be wrong.

16 inches of snow and the Senate vote forced Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine into an unconventional parking spot for our Monster SUV with its enormous (carbon) footprint.

No. Every Senate Staffer worked all weekend and not because the DC snowplowpersons buried their cars.

(If the boss is working, the staff better be working. More than just business etiquette.)

So. Senate rules allow for 30 hours of debate from dropped bill to vote taking. 30 hours was up at 1am last night. Reid got his speedy vote on health care reform. They broke it. They bought it.

The baby is split.

Both Americans United for Life and Planned Parenthood now oppose ObamaCare.

What makes for such strange, well, bedfellows?

Our liberal pro-choice friends want abortion at any time, for any reason, at an everyday low price, funded by tax payers.

Conservative pro-lifers do not want any tax dollars to pay for abortion. As well as that other stuff; like the science that life begins at conception...

Both sides are unhappy with the bill. This is not a reason for our legislators to be happy.

Yes, some cynics-- ok, me-- suggest that pro-choice Planned Parenthood is not genuinely against ObamaCare. Liberals are planning to hang the abortion ornament on the healthcare Christmas tree on later laps. The Alert Reader will note that AUL had a statement up immediately after the vote. Planned Parenthood, as of this writing, has not updated there website.

The Senate Democrats have proved that they are indeed, the Party of Death. Let us work to show that the House Democrats are not.

***

This is how bad the Senate Democrats miscalculated: An Alert Reader sends this last night,

I was not for Huckabee last year, but watching him in Nebraska, [home of Nelson(D)] I would definitely like to vote for him in 2012. Merry Christmas!

Conservatives, who outnumber liberals 2 to 1 are now mad and mobilized. And so are pro-choicers. Planned Parenthood and Huckabee are surely planning joint appearances.

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpgHere is Charmaine's statement, 60 Senators Just Made History...

60 U.S. Senators just made history by voting to move forward with a bill that imposes a first-ever mandatory abortion tax on the American people.

Majority Leader Reid held this vote in the middle of the night because he knows that the vast majority of Americans don't want this new tax and don't want tax dollars bankrolling insurance plans that cover abortion.

A 'yes' vote is a solid 'yes' to the expansion of federal funding for abortion.

We will be making this tragic decision clear to those constituents who have been misinformed that their Senator is pro-life.

ObamaCare cloture is not something that a Solomon would do.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


WebCast Debrief & Audio File

December 18, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Some 26,000 good-guys registered to listen to the WebCast that was conducted this past Tuesday night in Charmaine's offices at Americans United for Life.

Following is the follow-up letter from the Stop the Abortion Mandate coalition.

webcast_15-Dec-2009_group_presenters.jpg Webcast presenters: L to R Tony Perkins, Family Research Council; Wendy Wright, Concerned Women for America; Kristan Hawkins, Students for Life; David Bereit, 40 Days for Life; Charmaine Yoest, Americans United for Life Marjorie Dannenfelser, Susan B. Anthony List; and Douglas Johnson, National Right to Life.
Photo Credit: Hannah Yoest

"Help stop the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade..."
Listen to the recording of the URGENT nationwide webcast to prevent Washington D.C. bureaucrats and abortion industry lobbyists from using GOVERNMENT FUNDS to pay for abortions and bailout the failing abortion industry!

Despite the fact that most Americans do NOT want our government to pay for abortion with their money, the Senate caved in to pressure from Planned Parenthood and abortion industry lobbyists.

The Senate health care bill -- if passed into law -- will result in a MASSIVE government-funded bailout of the abortion industry -- and the largest expansion of abortion since Roe v. Wade!

To respond swiftly to this crisis, the 70+ pro-life and pro-family organizations that make up the Stop the Abortion Mandate Coalition joined together on Tuesday, December 15, for a huge nationwide webcast, featuring a panel of expert presenters:
Webcast presenters: Tony Perkins, Wendy Wright, Kristan Hawkins, David Bereit, Charmaine Yoest, Marjorie Dannenfelser, and Douglas Johnson

The entire webcast event was recorded, and as you listen to the audio, you will discover:

* The LATEST UPDATES straight from our nation's capital...

* The shocking implications of the bill that the abortion industry is trying to ram through the United States Senate RIGHT NOW...

* Why respected leaders, national organizations, and pro-life people are joining together in record numbers to BLOCK this attempted power-grab...

* How YOU can make a difference at this crucial moment...

Listen now -- click here

Download MP3 file here

Dispel the Myth

The Stupak-Pitts Amendment (see the actual language here) which passed in U.S. House of Representatives verison of health care reform ensures that government money will not be used to fund abortions. The Stupak Amendment clearly maintains the current status quo keeping in line with the already in-place Hyde Amendment. However, some are falsely saying that that the Stupak Amendment goes beyond Hyde. Check out our chart below which compares Stupak to Hyde and read this op-ed by the Con. Bart Stupak on what exactly his amendment does.

Stupak-vs-Hyde-Chart.jpg

Stupak vs Hyde Chart

For more info, see Americans United for Life blog.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Stop the Abortion Mandate: WebCast Tonight, Free

December 15, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

webcast_15-Dec-2009.jpgCharmaine is hosting the Stop The Abortion Mandate WebCast from her offices in Your Nation's Capital across from the Treasury building.

Interesting venue. The US Treasury is where our tax dollars will flow into - and out of - to pay for abortions under ObamaCare. Register and listen in tonight.

cash_for_kids_abortion_mandate.jpg

Obama's Cash for Kids Program
Abortion is horror enough. Now we have to pay for it. Cash for Kids.

Even Pro-Choice liberals don't care for this...

Charmaine's letter follows.

***

Dear Friend,

We desperately need your help as the U.S. Senate moves on pro-abortion health care legislation, so please join us for a Stop the Abortion Mandate Coalition live audiocast roundtable - Tuesday night, December 15th at 9 p.m. ET - to find out what you can do to take action on this urgent issue.

LIVE AUDIOCAST DETAILS:

WHAT: Stop the Abortion Mandate Urgent Audiocast

DATE: Tuesday, December 15th

TIME: 9 PM Eastern, 8 PM Central, 7 PM Mountain, 6 PM Pacific

Register now at: www.StopTheAbortionMandate.com/audiocast

Expert presenters include:

CHARMAINE YOEST, Americans United for Life

MARJORIE DANNENFELSER, Susan B. Anthony List

TONY PERKINS, Family Research Council

KRISTAN HAWKINS, Students for Life of America

DOUGLAS JOHNSON, National Right to Life Committee

KRISTEN DAY, Democrats for Life

WENDY WRIGHT, Concerned Women for America

DAVID BEREIT, 40 Days for Life

JOIN US TO HEAR...

The LATEST UPDATES on abortion and its inclusion in the Senate health care
legislation...

What's at stake if the abortion industry successfully pushes their agenda through passage of this pro-abortion bill...

What you can do SPECIFICALLY to help us BLOCK this NOW.

We hope you can join us. Thank you for helping defend life!

For Life,
Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg
Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO

P.S. Even if you can't participate in this live audiocast, you can contact Congress today by clicking here and call your Senator at (202) 224-3121.

P.S.S. Please forward this email to at least one friend.

http://stoptheabortionmandate.com/webcast/

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Margaret Sanger, Quotes from
The Pivot of Civilization

December 9, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Margaret_Sanger_KKK_rally.jpg

Margaret Sanger has become a parody
of feminism and Planned Parenthood,
"I accepted an invitation to talk
to the women's branch
of the Ku Klux Klan" from her Autobiography

We prefer the policy of immediate sterilization... p 35

"[O]rganized...charity...reveals...a defect. [Where] organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease." p. 38.

The theme of The Pivot of Civilization is summed in Margaret Sanger's fifth chapter, "The Cruelty of Charity." p.37. A "debauch of sentimentalism..." p.38.

"[S]chools for the blind, deaf and mute...our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost ...of this dead weight of human waste." p. 39.

***

The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger was published by Brentano's, New York, in 1922. The introduction was graciously provided by H. G. Wells, one of Sanger's numerous sex partners.

The Dedication is written by another lover, Havelock Ellis.

"This book['s]...central challenge is that civilization is based upon the control...of Sex." Sex is capitalized in the original. p. 1.

Later Sanger expands the challenge to "Hunger and Sex." Capitalizations in original. p.1.

Sanger gushes of "...women fired with the glorious vision of a new world...emancipated...a Utopian world,-- it glowed in romantic colors..." p. 2.

Margaret Sanger "was driven to ask whether this urging power of sex [not capitalized this time]...was not...responsible...for the widespread misery of our world." p. 3.

"...Civilization could not solve the problem of Hunger until it recognized the titanic strength of the sexual instinct." p. 3.

Sanger quotes Lecky, "The greatest of all evils in politics is power without control." p. 5.

Sanger enjoyed the endorsement of "The neo-Malthusian movement in Great Britain [who] came to our support." p. 5.

Sanger tells us that "Official moralists" are responsible for the presence of "the moron and the imbecile..." p. 6.

"The lack of balance between the birth-rate of the "unfit" and the "fit,"...the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. The... inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken, [present the need] to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective." p. 9.

This menace demands action, "Possibly drastic and Spartan methods may be forced upon American society if it continues complacently to encourage the chance and chaotic breeding that has resulted from our stupid, cruel sentimentalism." p. 9.

This is Sanger's religion and gives us her book title-theme, "To effect the salvation of the generations of the future...[for] the formation of a code of sexual ethics...[where] we shall best be serving the pivotal interests of civilization." p. 9.

"We must temper our emotion and enthusiasm with the impersonal determination of science." p. 9. Except, perhaps, if science contradicts abortion as Cecile Richards, current president of Planned Parenthood, demands.

Margaret Sanger has an odd definition of Motherhood. It is not a calling. It is not fulfillment of womanhood. It is not joy. "Motherhood, which is not only the oldest but the most important profession...has received few of the benefits of civilization." p. 10. Indeed Sanger believes that Motherhood is little different from the other "oldest profession" as commonly understood. (See "[P]rostitution legalized by the marriage ceremony." Woman and the New Race p.112)

Sanger seemingly longs for an ancient, simpler age where, "[P]rimative tribes were rude enough and severe enough to prevent the unhealthy growth of sentimentality, and to discourage the irresponsible production of defective children...[the] results of uncontrolled breeding" p. 10-11.

Much like her modern liberal sisters, Margaret Sanger has a dark interpretation of woman and child. "One searches in vain for some picture of sacred motherhood...[where] chance parenthood [causes] the great social problems of feeble-mindedness, crime and syphilis...[birthed by] slaved-mothers " p. 12-13.

Sanger was an active supporter of the junk-science of eugenics in the early 1900's. "[T]he Galton Laboratory for Great Britain, show[ed that] an abnormally high rate of fertility is usually associated with poverty, filth, disease, feeblemindedness and a high infant mortality rate." p. 16.

Margaret Sanger does not want the government nor philanthropies nor charities to "[A]ssume the responsibility of keeping your [unplanned] babies alive....They tacitly assume that all parenthood is desirable, that all children should be born, and that infant mortality can be controlled by external aid." p.17.

Sanger sets the stage for the abortion and infanticide debate in our time, "In truth, unfortunate babies who depart [die] during their first twelve months are more fortunate in many respects than those who survive to undergo punishment for their parents' cruel ignorance and complacent fecundity [the ability to reproduce]." p. 18.

Margaret Sanger, working with the unions, wanted fewer children to keep labor wages high and to keep children out of the labor market. "[C]heap childhood is the inevitable result of chance parenthood. Child labor is organically bound up with the problem of uncontrolled breeding and the large family." p. 19.

Sanger writes of the "[P]ure American stock" uninfected by immigrant genes. p. 23.

Parents are the epitome of, "[S]inister selfishness...who bring babies into the world to become child-slaves." p. 23.

The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, quotes approvingly of the National Child Labor Committee, that writes, "It is not only through the lowered power, the stunting and the moral degeneration of its individual members, but in actual expense, through the necessary provision for the human junk, created by...charitable organizations." p. 24 [Emphasis mine. Quote is attributed to the National Child Labor Committee by Sanger.]

Sanger knew that family size limitation needed the authority figures of physicians and African-American clergy to implement an incremental strategy to stop the "imbeciles" and "Negros" from having children. Here Sanger seems to advocate abortion, not merely contraception,


There is but one practical and feasible program in handling the great problem of the feeble-minded. That is, as the best authorities are agreed [medical doctors], to prevent the birth of those who would transmit imbecility to their descendants...Modern conditions of civilization...furnish the most favorable breeding-ground for the mental defective, the moron, the imbecile. p. 28

"[T]he progress of civilization and of human expression has been hindered and held back by this burden of the imbecile and the moron." p. 32.

"[T]he menace of the moron..." is harmful also because, "[T]here is a point at which philanthropy may become positively dysgenic [or cacogenics -- the study of factors producing the...perpetuation of defective... genes and traits in offspring], when charity is converted into injustice to the self-supporting citizen, into positive injury to the future of the race." p. 34

Here sums the Margaret Sanger world view and her course of action,

The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be face immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period. Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed other defectives...p. 35

The Sanger final solution,


[W]hen we realize that each feeble-minded person is a potential source of an endless progeny, we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood [planned or not] is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded. p. 35

"Eugenics seems to me to be valuable in its...diagnostic aspects...seeking to re-establish the dominance of the healthy strain over the unhealthy...over the unfit [retarded]" p. 36

Chapter V is entitled, "The Cruelty of Charity," p.37. Margaret Sanger begins the chapter with an approving quote from Herbert Spencer,

Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is extreme cruelty. It is a deliberate storing up of miseries for future generations. There is no greater curse to prosperity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.

"[O]rganized...charity...reveals...a defect. [Where] organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease." Margaret Sanger continues,

Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the "failure" of philanthropy, but rather at its success. p. 38.

"These dangers...in...humanitarianism...produce their full harvest of human waste...[by] the Salvation Army [and its] debauch of sentimentalism..." p.38.

This debauchery includes, "[S]chools for the blind, deaf and mute...our eyes should be opened to the terrific cost ...of this dead weight of human waste." p. 39.

"Such "benevolence"... conceals a stupid cruelty..." p. 40.

And "The most serious charge that can be brought against modern "benevolence" is that it encourages the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents and dependents." p. 43.

"[T]oday's disorder and danger...is fundamentally a sexual problem." p. 45.

"[S]entimental charities, which sprang up like mushrooms, only tended to increase the evils of discriminant breeding." p. 46.

"Eugenic thus aims to seek out the root of our trouble...cleaning itself of inherent defects...hereditable taints...feeble-minded...breeding an ever-increasing army of under-sized, stuntedand dehumanized slaves..." p. 61.

Margaret Sanger believes that eugenics is necessary to stop, "Insanity, criminality and tuberculosis..." p. 63.

So how does Margaret Sanger want society stop this? "The...feeble-minded...should be...prevented from propagating their kind." p. 63.

Sanger tells us, "We want, most of all, genius." p. 64.

But, "Eugenics is chiefly valuable in its negative aspects." p. 65.

"Eugenics...[with] clear thinking [will provide] the means to racial health." p. 66.

"[R]ational selection must take the place of natural selection..." p. 71.

Margaret Sanger demands to stop "[T]he hypocrisy of the well-to-do, who are willing to contribute generously to charities and philosophies, who spend thousands annually in the upkeep and sustenance of the delinquent, the defective and the dependent..." p.73.

Margaret Sanger gives voice to the modern pro-abortion feminist, "Woman's power can only be expressed ...when she refuses the task of bringing unwanted children into the world..." p. 73.

Margaret Sanger provides marriage counseling, "More marriages fail from inadequate and clumsy sex love than from too much sex love." p. 75.

New Age religion is not new. Margaret Sanger is a foremother to Shirley MacLaine. We need not look to "the illusion of some extra-terrestrial Heaven." No, "The Kingdom of Heaven is in a very definite sense within us."

Sanger opens Chapter X: Science the Ally begins by quoting Robert G. Ingersoll,
"Science must make woman the owner, the mistress of herself. Science [is] the only possible savior of mankind." p. 78.

Margaret Sanger wants to, "Remove the moral taboos...[and] free the individual from the slavery of tradition." p. 82.

"Our approach opens to us a fresh scale of values... [that] frees the mind of sexual prejudice and taboo." p. 86.

Margaret Sanger says that people should all, "[A]wakened to the realization that the source of life, of happiness, is to be found not outside themselves, but within..." p. 94.

"Our great problem is... to remodel the race..." p. 95.

Margaret Sanger displays little empathy,

Every single case of inherited defect, every malformed child, every congenitally tainted human being brought into this world is of infinite importance to that poor individual; but it is of scarcely less importance to the rest of us and to all of our children who must pay in one way or another for these biological and racial mistakes. p.96.

Sanger has a spiritual mission and concludes in the same God-less, New Age religion reference as in her book Woman and the New Race, "[H]ere close at hand is our paradise...our Heavenly and our eternity...we must seek the secret of eternal life." p. 97

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

[Update] The "progressive" philosophy of Margaret Sanger continues to this day. Alert (liberal) Reader milo9 writes, "I'm delightfully surprised that you're wearing your greed on your sleeves [of requesting a donation to a non-profit]. Such honesty is rarely seen on the Right." The Sanger premise that donations to charity are a misplaced greed is a tenet of the liberal mind-set.

Link photo credit to Jill Stanek and The Truth About Margaret Sanger.

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.

This work of Margaret Sanger does not have a copyright. The page numbering is from The Echo Library 2006 edition, www.echo-library.com. Complete text at the jump.

Jack Cashill has an outstanding review of The Pivot of Civilization in World Net Daily.


Continue Reading »

Americans United for Life Open Letter to
Planned Parenthood, and Video Debate on CNN

December 8, 2009 | By Jack Yoest




Yoest and Richards debate abortion on CNN
Charmaine has published an open letter to Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, in The Hill newspaper; must read in Your Nation's Capital.

Here's the full page letter. Let us know what you think.

aul action ad.pdf

Charmaine and Cecile debate on CNN.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Cecile Richards runs Planned Parenthood founded by Margaret Sanger. See Sanger quotes in Woman and the New Race.

Charmaine Quoted in The Wall Street Journal; Planned Parenthood Forbids the Science of the Sonogram

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Senator Hatch reads AUL Action's Score Letter about Abortion in Health Care, by Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.

November 21, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Senator Hatch reads Americans United for Life Action's Score Letter about Abortion in Health Care, by Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.. A "score" is the report card used by non-profits to grade politicians on each vote. Watch the short video:

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity and at Management Training of DC, LLC.


Charmaine on CNN Debating
Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood

November 12, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine on CNN matched up with Cecile Richards, Margaret Sanger's heir from Planned Parenthood, discuss the Pro-Life Amendment in the House healthcare bill now on its way to the Senate.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest



Woman And The New Race, Margaret Sanger Quotes

November 10, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

sanger_sons_woman_and_the_new_race.jpg"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Woman and the New Race by Margaret Sanger contains the thinking and the strategies of the organization that would become today Planned Parenthood.

Margaret Sanger and her sons. Her daughter is not pictured.

The book was published in 1920 by Truth Publishing Company in New York and is dedicated to

The Memory of my Mother,
A Mother
Who Gave Birth To Eleven Living Children

We do not know how many miscarriages or still births Sanger's mother endured, but they were probably many. Today some 20 percent of pregnancies miscarry.

The Preface is penned by Havelock Ellis who tells us that "The Woman movement...is a neglected by-product of the French Revolution..." Dr. Ellis was a hero to Margaret Sanger. He writes in his autobiography that he and Sanger were "mildly intimate." Indicating, perhaps a code-phrase for sex for the time.

The theme of Woman and the New Race is of Eugenics, Overpopulation and Birth-control.

cecile_richards_planned_parenthood_vogue_abortion.jpg

Heiress of Margaret Sanger,
Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood,
in Vogue tells of her aborted child
[not pictured]
"[Women] went on breeding with staggering rapidity those numberless, undesired children who became the clogs and the destroyers of civilizations." p. 5

"[Women] even went on the extreme of infanticide and abortion." p. 5 However Margaret Sanger would not oppose abortion if it was "safe."

"War, famine, poverty and oppression of the workers...will cease when [each woman] limits her reproductivity." p. 7

"[W]oman's struggle...has been manifested in such horrors as infanticide, child abandonment and abortion." p.10

But Margaret Sanger seems to want to confuse the reader with her favorable review of the ancient Greek customs of the "killing of deformed or sickly infants." Sanger quotes historian Westermark, "Plato condemns all those children who are imperfect in limbs as well as those who are born of depraved citizens." p.17

Continue reading at the jump.


Continue Reading »

Media Alert: Charmaine on MSNBC
Debating NARAL on Abortion in ObamaCare
And What's in a Name?

| By Jack Yoest

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpg

Charmaine Yoest will be debating Nancy Keenan, President of NARAL Pro-Choice America (formerly the National Abortion Rights Action League).

They will discuss the pro-life, anti-abortion amendment language and the future of the House Bill as it moves to the Senate.

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.

It's gonna be good.

Charmaine's AUL Action will not support any bill with out abortion funding restrictions.

Keenan's NARAL will not support any bill with abortion funding restrictions.

They will appear on Dr. Nancy on MSNBC. Hit time is 12 noon EST.

As one would expect from the liberal MSNBC, the host will not be unbiased. See MSNBC's 'Doctor Nancy' Admits She Finds Pro-Life Democrats 'Infuriating'

So the odds will be 2 on 1. Which is unusual. Charmaine usually faces 3 on 1.

And wins.

Tune in and let us know what you think.

***

Alert Readers know that Your Business Blogger(R) teaches marketing at the local college and makes a study of the intersection of politics and business and truth. NARAL changed its name because no one could stomach ABORTION in their org title. Much like KFC used to be Kentucky FRIED Chicken. ABORTION and FRIED are hard to swallow. It is good marketing to use short words, short phrases -- the best marketing is to use well understood acronyms. As in USA.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest


Media Alert: Charmaine in The Wall Street Journal
on Tax Dollars Shouldn't Fund Abortion

October 15, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpgCharmaine has an article up this morning on your tax dollars going to pay for abortions. Only 13 percent of the American public approves of tax-payer funding of abortion.

* OPINION
* OCTOBER 14, 2009, 6:57 P.M. ET

Tax Dollars Shouldn't Fund Abortion
Every Democratic health bill so far on offer would change 30 years of federal practice.

By CHARMAINE YOEST [Ph.D.]

The debate over health-care reform is now entering a new phase. This week, the Senate Finance Committee voted for Sen. Max Baucus's health-care bill, which sets up a possible Senate vote on the legislation later this month. Aggressive negotiations are underway on how to handle abortion funding.

Democratic leaders claim that all they want is to maintain the "status quo" on abortion. In reality, maintaining what we have now isn't even on the table. To do that, a health-care bill would have to explicitly prevent federal dollars from being used for elective abortions. Provisions that would have done that were killed by all five committees that have handled health-care reform bills this year. Instead, the abortion compromise in the works is a provision modeled on an amendment Rep. Lois Capps (D., Calif.) added to the House bill.

The Capps Amendment is a radical departure from the status quo. As it stands now, the federal government does not pay into health-care plans that cover elective abortions. What's more, no government health plans cover elective abortion, period. That includes Medicaid, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, the State Children's Health Insurance Program, and other programs.

Continued at the jump. Be sure to read the comments on the original article on WSJ.com.

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @CharmaineYoest and @JackYoest


Continue Reading »

Media Alert: Charmaine in WashTimes,
Is abortion health care, or is it not? FOX Video

September 22, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine has an article in The Washington Times,

Is abortion health care, or is it not? This existential question is precisely the debate we confront

By Charmaine Yoest, [Ph.D.]



Charmaine on FOX

The health care debate, the greatest challenge of the Obama presidency, has abortion at its epicenter, and no one realizes this more than the White House. In recent weeks, President Obama, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have all insisted that the health care proposals under consideration would not cover abortion.

Nevertheless, that's not the reality we face on the Hill. Recently, we [Charmaine and Mary Harned] had a meeting with senior White House officials to focus on our serious opposition to the abortion mandate in health care reform. They reiterated the president's statement from his address before Congress and were noncommittal about specific language that would address the current concerns of pro-life advocates.

The truth is that the health care packages under consideration do include abortion funding. Without a specific statutory amendment that includes an explicit ban on federal funding and coverage, we face health care reform that includes abortion.

Lost in the debate over whether or not abortion is "in there" - whether or not you can flip to a certain page and point to a particular clause related to abortion funding - is an understanding among political elites that this is a watershed battle over definition. It's existential, if you will, and comes down to a very straightforward question: Is abortion health care, or is it not?

An inadvertent answer from the abortion advocates' side emerged during the debate over H.R. 3200 in the House Education and Labor Committee on July 22 after Rep. Mark Souder, Indiana Republican, offered an amendment to exclude abortion funding from health care reform. Rep. Lynn Woolsey, California Democrat, clearly miffed, responded:

"[Abortion] is a legal medical practice and by even having to talk about it ... we're not talking about having your tonsils out. ..."

No, indeed we are not. As a matter of public policy, we still have the ability to differentiate between an abortion and a tonsillectomy. But this is precisely the debate we confront.

Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby define abortion as health care, as being morally equivalent to a tonsillectomy, and health care reform is their vehicle for imposing that view definitively with the full force of the federal government.

For the record, the Souder amendment to bar federal funding of abortion failed, as have all similar attempts to provide a clear and unequivocal abortion exclusion.

This is literally a defining moment for the pro-life movement. On Planned Parenthood's Web site, the very first category under Health on the navigation bar is Abortion.

Follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest



Continue Reading »

Will Abortion Be Covered In ObamaCare?
Is There An Abortion Mandate?

September 12, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine sends this out to the good-guys on AUL Action

Dear Friend,

Wednesday night, before a joint session of Congress and tens of millions of TV viewers and radio listeners, President Obama repeated his claim that, under his health care reform agenda, "no federal dollars will be used to fund abortion." But, in fact, he is throwing his support behind legislation that will equate abortion with basic health care.
abortion_check_void.jpg
We reported on the President's speech as it happened on the AUL Blog. Afterwards, we posted an official statement detailing the gap between Obama's claims and the agenda his administration is pursuing in Congress, including this observation from AUL Action Staff Counsel Mary Harned:

mary_harned_scotus_aul.jpg"No matter how President Obama and Congress change the structure of the health care reform proposals -- whether there is a public option, co-op, exchange, or the like -- any legislation that provides government funding for health care must contain explicit language that excludes abortion."

Mary Harned

You can read the entire statement on our blog, and I encourage you to send it to your friends and family so that they'll understand why it is so vital that the President take positive action to protect life.

Speaking of AUL Action Staff Counsel Mary Harned, she met with Capitol Hill legislative staff on Thursday to brief them on the abortion issues in the health care bills, as part of our "Back to the Hill" campaign. Mary is right at home on the Hill, having formerly served as Chief Counsel to U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla).

I will have the opportunity to relay your concerns about health care reform directly to the White House in less than a week, when AUL Action meets with White House officials Melody Barnes and Tina Tchen. One of our most powerful means to show the President the strength and dedication of pro-life Americans is our Keep Abortion Out of Health Care petition, which I will personally deliver at that September 17 meeting. That's why, if you haven't already done so, I urgently ask you to join your name to the thousands who have already signed the petition at RealHealthCareRespectsLife.com.

Another important means of influencing Congress to include protections for life in health care legislation is the "Voided Check" campaign of the Stop the Abortion Mandate Coalition of which AUL is a proud member. Click on the "Voided Check" at StopTheAbortionMandate.com to contact your elected representatives and tell them you don't want the government funding abortion.

Thank you for joining me in protecting and defending life!

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpgFor Life,

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO

***

P.S. Let me know what you think! You can follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and follow AUL on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. We're also reachable by e-mail at info@aul.org.


Americans United for Life
Statement in Response to President Obama's Address

September 10, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Following is AUL's response.

by Heather Smith on September 9, 2009

In his address to a Joint Session of Congress this evening, President Obama repeated his claim that "no federal dollars will be used to fund abortion." However, he failed to commit to supporting language that explicitly prohibits the use of taxpayer dollars for abortion.

AUL's President and CEO, Dr. Charmaine Yoest, expressed disappointment [she did not yell, 'You Lie!'...] in the President's address, stating, "President Obama has previously articulated a desire to see a decrease in the number of abortions performed in the United States. Yet he is throwing his support behind legislation that will equate abortion with basic health care." Dr. Yoest further explained that "Americans understand that abortion is not health care, and that the women and unborn children in our country deserve better."

AUL's Staff Counsel, Mary Harned, said, "No matter how President Obama and Congress change the structure of the health care reform proposals -- whether there is a public option, co-op, exchange, or the like -- any legislation that provides government funding for health care must contain explicit language that excludes abortion. Abortion is not health care; however, based on how courts have interpreted Medicaid, we know that courts will interpret any legislation relating to government-funded health care as requiring abortion coverage unless there is an explicit prohibition (like Hyde)."

In their legal memoranda, AUL's legal team has carefully explained how existing law will not prevent the health care bills from mandating taxpayer funding of abortion. They also documented how seven circuit courts have held that abortion is covered under Medicaid, necessitating an explicit prohibition on the inclusion of abortion. Dr. Yoest stated that "courts will certainly interpret any legislation that provides federal funding for health care as they have interpreted Medicaid in the past. So, any health care reform must include an explicit prohibition on abortion funding and coverage."

Current proposals mandate abortion coverage and funding in a number of ways, including:

1. An amendment to H.R. 3200 permits and may require abortion coverage in the public health insurance plan, and permits taxpayer funding of private plans that cover elective abortion through the provision of affordability credits
2. The Senate HELP bill delegates to a "Medical Advisory Committee" the role of deciding what benefits any private or public health care plan must offer. This Committee is expected to include abortion as a required minimum benefit.
3. Prior court holdings that state that abortion is included within several of Medicaid's mandatory categories of care (inpatient services, outpatient services, and preventative care) will certainly apply to any federal statute revising Medicaid and involving health care reform.
4. The rejection of several key pro-life amendments in the House and Senate Committees, which would have ensured that abortion was not funded in the bills, demonstrates that the bills are intended to mandate abortion.

Join Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @CharmaineYoest and @JackYoest


The Time Traveler's Wife & Jeremiah & Longfellow

September 4, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine_Yoest_aul_pub_shot_2009.jpgAmong pro-lifers the words of the ancient prophet Jeremiah have special meaning: 'I knew you before I formed you in the womb."

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.

This tells us that our lives have a transcendent meaning, and sets a frame for all of our work on life. Those words rang in my memory after Jack and I recently went to see the hit summer movie, The Time Traveler's Wife.

And while I certainly don't endorse all of the movie's values, I was drawn in by seeing a Hollywood movie where the title character is a wife.

(I should warn you though that my son, John, thought it was 'the worst movie ever," not enough explosions and car chases, I guess.)

Still, I thought the movie made a powerful pro-life statement. . . albeit entirely unintentional, I'm sure.

I'll confess that I have always loved stories about time travel. I know I'm not the only one because it shows up so often as a plot device. Our fascination with breaking the confines of time reminds me of C.S. Lewis' observation about the nature of man; he argues that there must be such a thing as "justice" because we feel so keenly outraged by "injustice":

A man feels wet when he falls into water,
because man is not a water animal:
a fish would not feel wet.
-C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity

We feel wet in water . . . and we feel uncomfortable with the passage of time ("Look how you've grown!") because we are eternal beings experiencing a temporal life.

I believe that's why we are drawn to stories about time travel. . . and particularly those about a love that transcends time. Because it speaks to the deeper reality of eternity that we recognize with some part of our souls. "I knew you. . . "

The Time Traveler's Wife is billed as a love story, and it is. But in many ways, the love story at the heart of the tale is the bond between the couple and their daughter. The scene that stays with me is one where the wife, Clare, pregnant with their daughter, is taking a bath.

Her husband Henry suddenly returns from time-traveling where he has just been with their daughter, ten years in the future. Clare has suffered several miscarriages, so she worries about carrying the baby to term. . . Having now met their daughter, Henry can reassure her.

'She's beautiful, Clare,' he tells her.

Surprised, Clare looks with wonder toward her very advanced pregnancy and says, "You've met her?"

They laugh together with joy, with the knowledge that the very same unborn baby with them that day lives in the future as the vibrant ten-year-old that Henry has just met. They knew their daughter, even before they'd met her in real time.

It's fanciful. But it also reflects a truth about the unique, timeless, value of each life.

My father used to tell me that before my birth I was "a twinkle in my mother's eye."
the_diva_dancer_baby-boo_2009_aul.jpg

Similarly, our son James, the youngest of our five children, sometimes asks where he was when he sees the pictures of our family before he was born. We tell him he was an angel in heaven watching and waiting his turn to join the family and increase the fun. The notion reassures him that he has always been a part of our family, unbounded by time and space.

This weekend we'll be packing up the kids in the Suburban and heading south to North Carolina to visit Jack's mom.

Helena, Sarah and James Yoest

I imagine many of you will be doing something similar.

As we turn our attention to family and friends this weekend, I wanted to take a minute just to thank you for standing with us and enabling us to defend life together.

First thing Tuesday we'll be back in the fray as Congress returns and health care reform is at the top of the agenda. The President will be giving a major address on health care on Wednesday and the following week we'll be meeting with his Domestic Policy Advisor at the White House to talk about the abortion mandate in health care. So we will be ready to run hard again next week and the AUL legal team will have new material for you on Tuesday. We'll be back quickly to our usual policy focus.

But in the meantime, as we slow down for the Labor Day holiday, it's worth taking a few minutes together to reflect on why we persevere in this fight. Even Hollywood tells the truth when they want to tell a good story. As Longfellow penned in his Psalm of Life:

Life is real! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was not spoken of the soul.

Life is real. And it's worth defending.

Thank you for joining me in working to protect and defend life!

Yours For Life,

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO


PS: Let me know what you think: you can 'follow" me on Twitter and Facebook. You can also 'follow' AUL on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube! We're also reachable by email at info@aul.org.


Media Alert: Charmaine CBN, 700 Club on
Obama Abortions & Denial of Care

August 24, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine will be appearing on the 700 Club tomorrow discussing abortion and healthcare.
obama_abortion_thumbsup_lifenews.jpg
(What an odd juxtaposition of words: Abortion -- Healthcare; 'abortion' takes the life of a baby and 'healthcare' preserves life.) (Except in ObamaCare where there is denial-of-care for newborns and, now, the elderly.)

As Your Business Blogger(R) tells my students, "The best indication of future performance...is past performance."

The clip can be watched now on the CBN website. Click here: What is the Truth About Abortions and Health Care Reform?

Please watch and let us know what you think. And how you think Charmaine's hair looks...


Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest

Reagan Conservatives

Stop the Abortion Mandate

And watch the Bloodmoney trailer:

In reducing abortions, House bills diverge.

Americans United For Life Welcomes South Dakota Decision Affirming a Woman's Right to Know.


The Thanatos Syndrome: A Book Prediction On Obama Denial of Care

August 21, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

A must-read book suggestion for our deadly times: The Thanatos Syndrome by Walker Percy. It has been a long-time favorite of ours.

It will soon be everyone's favorite.

From a few years ago...

Winston Churchill said that if a book is not worth reading twice, it's not worth reading once. Charmaine has a book suggestion that deserves double coverage.

Cross Posted at Reasoned Audacity by Charmaine:

I love nothing better as a Christmas present than a good book. (Unless, of course, the present sparkles.) After all the paper has been ripped apart, discarded, and finally cleaned up. . . to sit down with a cup of tea, ignore the kids (who are fighting, hopefully, playing happily with new toys) and lose yourself in another world. . .That's Christmas cheer for me.

If that's you, or someone you love, then National Review has the list for you! Kathryn put up today NRO's annual Christmas book-buying guide.

thanatos.jpg

There are some terrific suggestions from Ralph McInerny, Michael Novak, Victor Davis Hanson, Mary Ann Glendon, and, well, me.

My own suggestion is The Thanatos Syndrome, by Walker Percy. First, it's just a great story. But with Percy, there's always two more layers. He's such an unusual craftsman with words, that it's a joy to read him, technically -- to sit back and just watch the words march across the page. It's almost like watching Percy play.

More importantly, however, I called this novel "subversive" because it's not until the end of the book that the full import of the story becomes clear. He subtly pulls the reader along for a ride, then weaves a pro-life message into the book's wackiness.

I was bemused at the end -- I remember turning to Jack and saying, "Wow, how did he do that?" The book won a National Book Award!

Did I mention the underlying pro-life message??

What a hoot.

I think this Christmas, I'll reread it.

* * *

Now it's your turn. What else should I be reading this Christmas??

Cross-posted at Zeitgeist.

###

From Ralph C. Wood,

...Percy likens late 20th-century American life to the Weimar Republic. He finds harrowing parallels between our own behaviorists and the German scientists who practiced eugenics while quoting Rilke and Goethe and Schiller.

Our culture shares with theirs, Percy suggests. a mere utilitarian regard for human life.

The logical conclusion of that view is that those who are "useless" to themselves or the world -- unwanted infants, nursing home residents and victims of severe mongolism, epilepsy, encephalitis, arteriosclerosis, progressive neurological disease and hopeless schizophrenia -- ought to be "compassionately" eliminated.

In the absence of a "life with dignity," reasons one of Percy's humanist technicians, those who make no 'contribution" to society should all be accorded their right to a "death with dignity."

The sickness-unto-death that first manifested itself at Verdun and the Somme did not end with Dachau and Hiroshima; it has penetrated to the very core of American culture.

Percy gives our spiritual disease terrifying expression by having a team of well-meaning humanists enact their own deceptively decent form of demonry.

Follow Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine Yoest on Twitter: @JackYoest and @CharmaineYoest


Stop the Abortion Mandate:
The Video

| By Jack Yoest

charmaine_stopabortionmandate_hotair_screenshot_aul.jpg "Let all the babies be born.

Then let us drown those we don't like from the litter.

Let all the old folks die.

Who wants to feel their pain -- they're so old and bitter?"*

Apologies to G.K. Chesterton.

Charmaine Yoest, PH.D.
Screen Shot Courtesy Hot Air.

Obama is having trouble selling his socialized medicine.

Cecile Richards, CEO of Planned Parenthood supports Obama's health care government take over.

Americans United for Life Action does not.

Planned Parenthood has a money-making business model selling abortion. The Obama plan will demand abortion in health insurance plans and will provide tax dollars to provide for abortion on demand. Though all nine months -- and beyond: See Obama and the death of a live birth.

Planned Parenthood will make more -- lots more -- money.

Your Business Blogger(R) loves business. But not this one.

###



Join Fight FOCA
*"Let all the babies be born.

Then let us drown those we do not like."
GK Chesterton, Babies and Distributism, GK's Weekly, 11/12/32

Thank you (foot)notes:

Bait and switch healthcare - the Trojan Horse strategy
,

Below is an open letter to those who support the life of the pre-born and stand against a mandate which would fund abortions from tax revenue. This letter is from Charmaine Yoest, P.H. D, President and CEO of Americans United for Life. She writes:

"We've got inside information: Yesterday a media-relations executive from the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, giving a talk here in Washington on Planned Parenthood's health care reform strategy, made a comment that revealed the impact we've been making in thwarting the abortion industry's agenda. She lamented that because the "anti-choice" movement -- meaning pro-lifers like you and me -- had attracted so much attention to her organization's efforts to mandate abortion funding in health care reform, Planned Parenthood was being forced onto the defensive.

Anti-Abortion Coalition Called Into Question, By Sara Jerome

Myths about abortion in "Health Care" debacle


Media Alert:
Sotomayor Fundamental Right to Abortion;
Charmaine Yoest in Human Events

July 28, 2009 | By Jack Yoest



Charmaine's Testimony
to the Judiciary Committee
Charmaine has an article in Human Events,

Sotomayor: Fundamental Right To Abortion, Not to Bear Arms, by Charmaine Yoest, 07/28/2009

Of all the generalities and evasions that Judge Sonia Sotomayor offered the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation hearing, surely the strangest was one she made when describing her role in the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund.

Sotomayor was on the PRLDEF's board of directors for twelve years during the 1980s and early 1990s, a period when the fund issued no less than six briefs to the Supreme Court in abortion cases. Those briefs argued, among other things, that abortion was a "fundamental right" and that, contrary to scientific evidence, "the belief that life begins at conception is religious." In them, the PRLDEF called upon the high court to strike down every common-sense state law regulating abortion, including ones supported by the overwhelming majority of Americans -- such as parental-notification and informed-consent laws....

Dr. Yoest was the principal pro-life leader asked to testify at the Sotomayor hearings. For more, see www.sotomayor411.com.

Dr. Yoest is President & CEO of Americans United for Life and AUL Action.

Read the entire article here.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Panel to vote on Sotomayor, confirmation likely,

The anti-abortion rights group Americans United for Life has also weighed in against Sotomayor, writing to senators urging a "no" vote and announcing that it, too, would include her confirmation vote in its annual scorecard.

The group said it was concerned Sotomayor would "undermine any efforts by our elected representatives to pass even the most widely accepted regulations on abortion and circumvent the will of the people."

Abortion unleashed in Obama healthcare; The current health care bill will expand abortion more than anything since the Roe v. Wade decision by the Supreme Court. It will offer no freedom and little choice,

After the last election, the media wanted to write an obituary about the pro-life movement," said Dr. Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life, "but on Capitol Hill they're getting a lot of questions about FOCA, and this event is being taken very seriously. This battle over health care may seem new in some ways, but it's the latest fight over FOCA, dressed up differently."

Abortion a hurdle in health plan, Opponents gear up to fight 'any mandate' to require procedure, by Sylvia A Smith, Washington editor

WASHINGTON - Any health insurance bill Washington comes up with must ban coverage of abortion, one of the most common surgical procedures in the U.S., a group of organizations that oppose abortion has told Congress and President Obama.

The groups said they will ratchet up a campaign to ensure the "abortion mandate" is stripped from the bill.

"Abortion is not health care and does not belong in health-care reform," the president of Americans United for Life said in a letter to President Obama on Thursday.

Charmaine Yoest said her organization will oppose any bill that "fails to explicitly exclude both abortion funding and mandatory abortion coverage" and that doesn't allow health care providers to refuse to perform abortions.


Liberal's War on the Weak & (un)Planned Parenthood

July 4, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

margaret_sanger.jpgThe most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

Margaret Sanger
Founder Planned Parenthood

Happy 4th of July...

Alert students of Your Business Professor know that men are not equal to each other.

This is one of the great challenges in Business Law: understanding that the Law is King. Not the KIng is King. But Lex Rex.

Men are equal in the eyes of our Creator; in the eyes of the Law. Our governance and justice should be based on Natural Law and the original intent of our Constitution.

Conservatives and Liberals see equality, so to say, differently:

Conservatives:

Creator

Law
over
Man.....Man

Where all men are equal under the law.

The modern Liberal flow chart is different and cascades so,

Creator (irrelevant)

Law (extension of policy-judges become legislators/politicians)

man = man

Men are equal to each other under the new Liberal equation.

Conservatives however, would submit that each person has equal value under law, under the Creator.

But if the Liberal removes the Creator and Law simply becomes an extension of a political policy shop then the Liberal is left with only Man. Who must be then equal to one another. Because we still do believe in equality.

Maybe.

So how can we judge the new Liberal paradigm of equality without the Creator or the Law?

By observation -- By how we treat the least among us. How we treat "retarded people."

Since all men are obviously "not equal" directly to each other -- what do liberals think of the weak, with no Creator? --

What do liberals think of those unequal in their liberal equation; what do they think of those "beneath" them?

***

NewsBusters' Noel Sheppard saved us an article from the liberal Huffington Post, HuffPoster: 'Palin Will Run In '12 On More Retardation Platform', July 3, 2009 - 19:52 ET

This is about as disgusting as Palin Derangement Syndrome can get.

A blog just published at the Huffington Post is disgracefully titled "Palin Will Run In '12 On More Retardation Platform."

The author, fiction and comedy writer Erik Sean Nelson... actually wrote the following (readers are seriously warned to proceed with caution as this is really vile stuff):

In Sarah Palin's resignation announcement she complained about the treatment of her son Trig who always teaches her life lessons. She said that the "world needs more Trigs, not fewer." That's a presidential campaign promise we can all get behind. She will be the first politician to actually try to increase the population of retarded people. To me, it's kinda like saying the world needs more cancer patients because they teach us such personal lessons.

Her first act as President: To introduce a Pre-K lunch buffet that includes lead paint chips. Sort of a Large HEAD-START Program.

She will then encourage women to hold off on pregnancies until their 40's just to mix up some chromosomes.

She now is in favor of abortion only in case of diploid birth [normal chromosomes-this liberal is saying that Palin would only want abortions on "normal" babies. This passes for humor for abortion supporters].

Her policies will increase jobs because Wal-Mart is building new stores each day and someone has to be the greeter. [Liberals hate, just hate Wal-Mart.]

This will lead to smaller government because fewer Americans will have the cognitive ability to hold a government job

Wow. Is this what passes for comedy today?

It will be interesting to see how long this post stays up before someone at HuffPo pulls it.

Stay tuned.

*****Update: The article has been pulled, apparently by the author who claimed: "I got some emails from offended loved ones of the retarded. No one was seeing the absurdity of Palin hiding behind her children, so my piece was not accomplishing anything good."

Imagine that.

Well, for posterity purposes, here's a screen-cap of the piece courtesy NB reader Brett Scheer:

Nice job, [HuffPo writer] Erik. Don't be a stranger.

--Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters.

Liberals support Barack Obama's vote against his state's Born Alive Infant Protection Act before he became president. His vote would allow babies born alive -- from a botched abortion -- to die by withholding treatment.

Obama's concern was that his vote might lead to overturning Roe v Wade which made abortion legal through all nine months - and beyond.

obama_thumbs_up.jpgHis philosophy is not new.

Barack Obama
Supports Planned Parenthood

This thinking was born, so to say, at the turn of the last century and made "popular" by Margaret Sanger, founder of modern Planned Parenthood.

In 2003, Edwin Black wrote a national bestseller War against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign To Create A Master Race.



War Against the Weak
Author Edwin Black does not oppose abortion. But he is nevertheless horrified by the disgust that elite Americans feel for the weak, "the least among us."

Edwin Black writes,

Sanger's solutions were mass sterilization and mass segregation of the defective classes, and these themes were repeated often in [her book] Pivot of Civilization.

"The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period.

Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed male defectives. The male defectives are no less dangerous.

Segregation carried out for one or two generations would give us only partial control of the problem.

Moreover, when we realized that each feeble-minded person is a potential source of endless progeny of defect, we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded."

Edwin Black then guides us to Margaret Sanger's solution,

Sanger was willing to employ striking language to argue against the inherent misery and defect of large families. In her book, Woman and the New Race, she bluntly declared,

"Many, perhaps, will think it idle to go farther in demonstrating the immorality of large families, but since there is still an abundance of proof at hand, it may be offered for the sake of those who find difficulty in adjusting old-fashioned ideas to the facts.

The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

It would appear that liberal elitists like Obama, in keeping with Margaret Sanger's world view, might have prefered that the Palins abort Trigg, Sarah's Down syndrome newborn.

Why?

To avoid the "pain and despair" these children have and cause, so says Obama.

Because an unexpected child is a "punishment."

What kind of political party would even consider a man with this world view to govern?

***

Edwin Black tells us more and connects the events in War Against The Weak,

During the period between the wars, the American [eugenics] movement viewed National Socialism [in Germany] as a rising force that could, if empowered, impose a new biological world order. [National Socialism] eugenicists promised to dispense with the niceties of democratic rule.

So even if America's tower of legislation, well-funded research and entrenched bureaucratic programs still monopolized the world of applied eugenics in the 1920's, National Socialism promised to own the next decade.

American eugenicists welcomed the idea.

Obama and the The Party of Death.

###

Thank you (foot)notes,

Follow us on Twitter: @jackyoest and @charmaineyoest

Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine are celebrating Independence Day at The Dude's All Star baseball tournament with our large family -- The Penta-Posse. When we got married we didn't know it would be so large...and so much fun. This is (un)planned parenthood. What would Margaret Sanger and Cecile Richards say?


Happy 4th of July from Americans United for Life:
Keeping the Founding Fathers' Legacy Alive

July 1, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine sends this out to the AUL good-guy list,

dude_pitching_14_yorktown_high_school_2009.jpgIt's nearly Independence Day, and, here in the Yoest household, that means a road trip!

Friday afternoon, Jack and I are filling up our black Suburban and taking our 'Penta-posse' -- our five kids -- to Charlottesville, VA, for our 14-year-old son John's all-star baseball tournament. How wonderful to spend July 4th in a city steeped in American history near the University of Virginia (my alma mater!), which was founded by Thomas Jefferson just a few miles from his Monticello home.

John Yoest, age 14
[Pitched a no hitter on his JV team -- as an 8th grader]
Photo Credit: Hannah Yoest

But although the calendar -- and the heat index -- says it's July 4, in my heart it feels like late November.

Independence Day has always been a kind of early Thanksgiving for me. I think about the sacrifices made by the Founding Fathers and their families, and of the blood shed by patriots so that America could be free, and I am so very thankful to be able to raise my children in the greatest country in the world.

The Founders wrote in the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

In naming three inalienable rights as endowed by humanity's Creator, the Declaration's authors were recognizing something unique and beautiful about being human. Taken together, those rights enable all the goods necessary for human flourishing.

More than that, the order in which the Founders listed the rights carries special meaning; it reveals the way one right flows from another. The right to liberty -- the freedom to thrive -- flows from the right to life, and from that liberty flows the ability to seek the happiness that will give one's life meaning and purpose.

I'm so honored to be working with the AUL team to further the understanding that the right to life enshrined in our Declaration extends to all humanity and includes the unborn.
yoest_family_DC_2009_dreamers_sweet_16_party.jpg
The right to life is the foundation of all the freedoms we enjoy as Americans. This is what we must teach our children on this family holiday, so that they and their children and their children's children may continue to live in a free country long after you and I have left this world.

Jack, Helena, Hannah, Charmaine, John, James, and Sarah at Hannah's recent
Sweet Sixteen celebration.

My friend and AUL colleague Bob told me today about a wonderful Fourth of July tradition in his family. Every year, he and his wife host a barbecue that is highlighted by having one of the children present, usually his own daughter, read out loud the entire Declaration of Independence.

Jack and I like that idea so much that we are adopting this as a Yoest family tradition. I think we'll have Helena, our 12-year-old who has a dramatic flair, read the Declaration of Independence before we watch the fireworks after John's baseball game. If you'd like join us in that tradition, click here for a printable copy of the Declaration.

Wishing you and your family a happy and healthy Fourth,
charmaine_signature.jpg


Charmaine, and the Yoest family

P.S. On Monday, the AUL team will be back at the job of defending the right to life, all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. For the latest news on President Obama's high-court nominee, visit Sotomayor411.com. It's a one-stop resource we've created to share in-depth background and analysis from our legal team on Judge Sotomayor, including detailed information on why she is worse on life issues than retiring Justice David Souter.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Follow us on Twitter.

Pro-Abortion Hispanic Group: Sotomayor Set Policy, Not Involved in Legal Briefs, by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor, July 1, 2009,

"Although the Senate will have a significant amount of materials to wade through, Charmaine Yoest, the president of Americans United for Life, has seen enough to say Sotomayor is pro-abortion and worse than Justice David Souter, whom she would replace.

Yoest points out that, during Sotomayor's time on the PRLDEF's board, its efforts "included no less than six briefs in five abortion-related cases before the Supreme Court -- pushing aggressively for an interpretation of abortion rights that would eliminate most or all state and federal abortion regulations while requiring state and federal funding of abortion."

In two of the legal briefs, "the PRLDEF's briefs took positions more extreme than those of Justice Souter, who joined with the court's majority to uphold restrictions the fund wanted struck down," Yoest added.

Ultimately, "Justice Sotomayor has never disavowed any of the PRLDEF's briefs, which are packed with the kind of extreme rhetoric more typical of left-wing blogs than of serious legal documents." "

U.S. appeals court upholds Virginia's ban on partial-birth abortion, By Catholic News Service

RICHMOND, Va. - Virginia's ban on partial-birth abortion is constitutional, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a 6-5 decision June 24.

"The head of Americans United for Life, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case and assisted the state with the litigation, said the "ban protects not only the unborn, but also the health and welfare of women."

"We are thrilled that the 4th Circuit followed clear U.S. Supreme Court precedent and upheld Virginia's ban on partial-birth abortion - which is more accurately called partial-birth infanticide," said Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO.

"It is a law that the vast majority of Americans are justified in supporting," she said. Opponents of the ban are expected to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the appellate court's decision.

The 2003 Virginia law makes it a felony to perform a partial-birth abortion, but it never went into effect because its constitutionality was challenged by a Richmond doctor who said the procedure can be necessary to protect the life of the mother. He also said the ban could prevent doctors from performing legal procedures for fear they would be prosecuted. "

From PA Pundits - International
"the relentless pursuit of common sense" - A Variety of Opinions From Various Writers -

"Only the pro-life group Americans United for Life has made a significant campaign against Sotomayor's ascension to the high court, calling her record on abortion rights "worse than [current Justice David] Souter's." Still, the fight should pick up once Sotomayor's confirmation hearings begin July 13."


Kim Gandy from NOW Stepping Down
See the Charmaine and Kim Smackdown

June 15, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

LifeNews reports that Kim Gandy is leaving the leadership of the National Organization for Women (NOW) to spend more time with her family. Maybe...

It is more likely that she will join the liberal feminists running the Obama administration.

gandy_yoest_six_panel_smack_down.JPG Charmaine has crossed paths with NOW's Gandy a time or two. The most memorable was in November 2005. At the time Your Business Blogger(R) noted the altercation,

I was in the middle of drafting an article on the glass ceiling for women. And got a first person account instead.

Click on image to enlarge; Charmaine on Right in red.

Today I thought I'd give the little woman a respite from the laundry and the kids. "Go play in the Nation's Capital," I said to Charmaine this morning. "Have a fun lunch with the girls!"

Then on the radio I hear Rush talk about a smack down at the Supreme Court and see a photo of Charmaine in her red power suit at Rush Limbaugh EIB Extra... .

She had Kim Gandy in a half-nelson. Elbowing Gandy aside at a press conference.

I have sat through a number of cantankerous board meetings. Adversarial budget negotiations. Hardball sales presentations. Terminations. Giving and getting.

But no one actually got spanked.

I thought the gathering of girls today would be a powder puff tea party of cooperation. Sweetness and light and reason and 'Please' and 'Thankyou.'

I was wrong. No one fights like a woman on a mission.

I'll have to rewrite the glass ceiling article.

(It is a joy to marry over your head.)



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to follow us on Twitter: jackyoest and charmaineyoest

Press Release: AUL Senior Counsel Clarke Forsythe Publishes new book.
Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President & CEO said, "Politics for the Greatest Good is a critical book for the pro-life movement at this time in history. This important focus on the achievable in political strategy...AUL Action

FOXBusiness reports, Americans United for Life Senior Counsel Clarke Forsythe Publishes Politics for the Greatest Good is now available at bookstores and Amazon.com.


Americans United for Life Launches
New Website: Sotomayor411.com

June 12, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Most people know very little about Supreme Court nominee Sotomayor. Americans United for Life will be alerting the public about the Pro-Abortion-Choice affinities of Sotomayor and the abortion agenda of president Obama.

AUL has published a new website www.Sotomayor411.com.

Sotomayor411.com

Click on the banner for outstanding research and analysis to learn about Sotomayor's judicial activism and the personnel policies of president Obama.

Alert Readers know that Charmaine served in presidential personnel in the (real) West Wing of the White House in the Ronald Reagan Administration. The direction from The Gipper was to hire carefully. Personnel is Policy.

President Obama shares more that oratorical elegance with Reagan. Obama also knows that Personnel is Policy.

Sotomayor is the personification of Obama's abortion policy.

###

Follow us on Twitter: jackyoest and charmaineyoest


The Washington Times Gets It Right:
Sotomayor's Abortion Ties

June 10, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

The Editorial page writer at The Washington Times has done some valuable research that will advance the debate on Sotomayor. The nominee is not Pro-Life.

EDITORIAL: Sotomayor's abortion ties, Don't believe disinformation that she's pro-life

The most basic evidence of the judge's support for Roe comes in the triple combination of White House assurances to that effect, of pro-choice senators declaring after meeting with her that they are sure she agrees with them, and of her entire jurisprudential approach of broadly construing anything characterized as "women's rights."



Other evidence is more direct. Consider that from 1980 until October 1992, Judge Sotomayor served on the board -- at times as vice president and at times as chairman of the litigation committee -- of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund. The New York Times in 1992 described her as "a top policy maker on the board." During that time period, the fund filed briefs in not one, not two, but at least six prominent court cases in strong support of "abortion rights."

***



Join Fight FOCA
Read the entire article here.



Obama will introduce the tenets of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) either by law or stealth and certainly through liberal, activist judges. Sign the Fight FOCA petition at Americans United for Life.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Read Sotomayor: Who Sleeps Better at Night, AUL or NARAL?

Follow Jack and Charmaine on Twitter: @jackyoest and @charmaineyoest


Dawn Eden, Author and Blogger
Joins Americans United for Life

June 9, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Alert Readers following Your Business Blogger(R) on Twitter know that Charmaine has recently hired some world-class talent.

dawn_eden.jpgWhere does she look for the best people?

The blogosphere.

Dawn Eden
Senior Fellow, Publications and New Media Outreach

Start a blog. Follow on Twitter. You might find a job. An employer might find you.

From an AUL press release,

Author and Blogger Dawn Eden Joins Americans United for Life,

Washington, DC -- Dawn Eden has joined Americans United for Life (AUL) as Senior Fellow, Publications and New Media Outreach. Her focus will be on writing and research to promote AUL's legal expertise through both traditional media and "new media" outlets.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President & CEO commented: "I am very pleased Dawn is joining our team. As a best-selling author and award-winning journalist, she brings a strong set of skills to the AUL team. With her dedication to the pro-life cause, Dawn will be a key part of our efforts to protect human life."

Miss Eden said: "It is my honor to join the team at AUL, America's oldest national pro-life organization. AUL is known for its unparalleled expertise across the spectrum of life issues and for its demonstrated success in motivating the grassroots. My goal as Senior Fellow is to expand the organization's publications and media presence in ways that will increase the public's recognition and support of not only AUL, but the entire pro-life movement."

Miss Eden is author of The Thrill of the Chaste (2006), a guide for young adults on being counterculturally virtuous. Now in its eighth printing, the book has been translated into Spanish, Polish, and Chinese.

A graduate of New York University, Miss Eden began her career as a music journalist in New York City. In 2004, she was awarded the Associated Press' top award for her work as a copy editor and headline writer for the New York Post.

In February 2002, she became a pro-life blogger (The Dawn Patrol), and has since contributed articles on politics and culture to the Wall Street Journal and National Review Online. In addition, she has been featured on NBC's "Today" and on EWTN, and has spoken throughout North America, England, Ireland, Poland, and Australia.


###

Get a job, start a blog.

Be sure to follow Jack and Charmaine on Twitter; jackyoest; charmaineyoest


Heather Smith, Top Radio Talk-Show Producer
Joins Americans United for Life

June 8, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Alert Readers following on Twitter know that Americans United for Life is making numerous key, high talent, hires,

Top Radio Talk-Show Producer Heather Smith Joins Americans United for Life.

heather_smith_aul.jpg
Heather Smith

Washington, DC -- Heather Smith has joined Americans United for Life (AUL) as Director of Communications. Her focus will be to oversee corporate communications including traditional media, internet, and new media.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President & CEO commented: "I am very pleased Heather is joining our team. As a veteran producer of radio, television, and film, she brings a wealth of experience and an insider's perspective to our communications efforts."

Miss Smith said: "It is a great honor to join the foremost pro-life organization in the country. I look forward to expanding AUL's media outreach and working with the AUL legal team toward our goal of seeing a nation in which everyone is welcomed in life and protected in law."

She has produced three top-10 nationally syndicated radio programs: The G. Gordon Liddy Show, The Laura Ingraham Show, and most recently, The Lars Larson Show. She has also worked at FOX News Channel, where she produced Weekend Live with Tony Snow and FOX News Live, and booked guests for FOX's breaking news special programming. In addition, she has produced film documentaries hosted by former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and by Dick Morris. Previously she booked interviews for WFLA-AM's The Shannon Burke Show and worked on several documentaries for PBS and History Channel.

Miss Smith has been in front of the microphone as well, having begun her media career in 1997 as an alternative rock disc jockey and radio talk show host. She has also been interviewed on FOX News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, and nationally syndicated talk radio programs about grassroots-activism campaigns she oversaw in Florida.

Please join us in welcoming Heather Smith to the Pro-Life professional legal-eagles at Americans United for Life.


Sotomayor: Who Sleeps Better at Night,
AUL or NARAL?
Charmaine Interviewed in USA Today
And by AP

June 5, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Alert Readers following on Twitter know that Charmaine has been in a number of media interviews.

Sometimes as a source.

Sometimes as a target.

See her quote in USA Today this morning on the Sotomayor nomination,

Sotomayor, a trial judge for six years and appellate judge for 11, has not ruled on a case involving Roe v. Wade. She has decided a few cases at the fringes of the issue, yet those defy predictions.

On Wednesday, Feinstein explained why she will persist on the abortion rights question: "I remember what it was like when abortion was illegal, and the lives of young desperate women were in jeopardy." She said she worries that "Americans no longer appreciate what it would mean if (abortion rights) were taken away."

Nominees usually elude such questions during their hearings.

"I don't have concerns about this nominee in the sense that I think there is something on the record (against abortion rights)," says Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. "We just think it's important for Supreme Court nominees to say where they stand."

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, agrees. While observing that she and Northup both see nothing definitive in Sotomayor's record, Yoest says, "I think Nancy's probably sleeping a little better at night."

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS at AP interviewed Charmaine for GOP leader doesn't rule out Sotomayor filibuster

Abortion-rights opponents circulated a 1988 legal brief joined by the PRLDEF that took a position in strong support of abortion rights and argued strenuously against dismantling the underpinnings of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that established a woman's right to end her pregnancy.

The brief, submitted to the Supreme Court to support a challenge to a Missouri law making it illegal to use public officials or facilities for abortions, warns of "the danger of tampering with the core framework of Roe v. Wade." The brief said doing so would disproportionately harm poor women of color. The high court ultimately upheld the Missouri law in the case, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.

There is no evidence or indication that Sotomayor had any role in drafting the brief, or the PRLDEF's decision to join it. Cesar A. Perales, now the group's president, said its board has never been involved in deciding which cases the organization takes on or matters of litigation. Board members sometimes do, however, help decide which legal issues the organization should focus on, Perales said.

But abortion-rights opponents said the brief raises questions about Sotomayor's stance on Roe.

"It's explicitly a pro-abortion argument," said Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life. "That specific case makes it very difficult for her to say that she doesn't have a position" on abortion rights.

Other citations on Sotomayor,

CitizenLink reports,

In a recent poll commissioned by Americans United for Life, 69 percent of respondents said they do not want a Supreme Court justice who opposes "making it illegal for someone to take a girl younger than the age of 18 across state lines to obtain abortions without her parents' knowledge."

The Catholic Review
writes
Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, a public-interest law and policy organization, said in a statement that "for all the president's talk of finding 'common ground,' this appointment completely contradicts that hollow promise." Without explaining why, Yoest said Sotomayor's "judicial philosophy undermines common ground" and called her "a radical pick that divides America."

Be sure to follow on Twitter, Jack and Charmaine.


Professor Robert P. George is Personally Opposed to the Killing of Abortionists

June 4, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Here is a tactic that Saul Alinski, mentor to president Obama and author of Rules for Radicals, would endorse: ridicule. This is difficult -- comedy is hard work -- and does not come easy for the good-guys to use. But Dr. George pulls it off.

"I am personally opposed to killing abortionists. However, inasmuch as my personal opposition to this practice is rooted in sectarian (Catholic) religious belief in the sanctity of human life, I am unwilling to impose it on others who may, as a matter of conscience, take a different view.

Of course, I am entirely in favor of policies aimed at removing the root causes of violence against abortionists. Indeed, I would go as far as supporting mandatory one-week waiting periods, and even non-judgmental counseling, for people who are contemplating the choice of killing an abortionist.

I believe in policies that reduce the urgent need some people feel to kill abortionists while, at the same time, respecting the rights of conscience of my fellow citizens who believe that the killing of abortionists is sometimes a tragic necessity--not a good, but a lesser evil.

In short, I am moderately 'pro-choice.'"

--Prof. Robert P. George


More Media on the Killing of Tiller,
Reaction from Americans United for Life

June 3, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Be sure to get Charrmaine's media updates on Twitter from Your Business Blogger(R) and @charmaineyoest

Pro-life leaders, groups condemn murder of Kansas abortion doctor, By Chaz Muth at the Catholic News Service reports,

WASHINGTON - Pro-life advocates universally condemned the May 31 murder of a Kansas abortion doctor, with officials from several U.S. right-to-life groups saying such extreme acts only hurt the pro-life cause.

"We condemn this lawless act of violence," said Charmaine Yoest, president of the Americans United for Life. "The foundational right to life that our work is dedicated to extends to everyone. Whoever is responsible for this reprehensible violence must be brought to justice under the law."

Dr. George Tiller, 67, of Wichita, Kan., was fatally shot while serving as an usher at the city's Formation Lutheran Church during morning services, according to The Associated Press

David Brody at CBN reports, Randall Terry Is Not Spokesman for Pro-Life Movement,

Let's start with a reality check. Randall Terry does not speak for the broader pro-life movement. It's important to note that just because Randall Terry from Operation Rescue speaks out forcefully againt abortion doctor George Tiller that does not mean his sentiment is shared among mainstream pro-life groups.

You don't need to believe me. Just compare Operation Rescue's website with Concerned Women for America or Americans United for Life and on and on. The sanctity of life message is the underlying theme but the tactics and language are different. Much different.

Colleen Raezler at NewsBusters reports
Media: Tiller a Martyr, Abortion Not Killing and Pro-Lifers are Crazy

Tiller as Abortion Rights Martyr

Broadcast networks painted Tiller as a man willing to die in defense of women's rights.

All of the broadcast coverage noted past attempts people have made to disrupt Tiller's work - a bombing of his clinic in the 1980s and a 1993 attack in which he was shot in both arms - which, while pertinent to the story, also increased the aura of martyrdom that now surrounds him.
...
Statements from major pro-life organizations revealed a different story: that the pro-life community truly views all loss of human life as a tragedy.

Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life, said "The foundational right to life that our work is dedicated to extends to everyone."

Opposing Views has Murder Not Justified, Pro-Life Leaders Say, By Baptist Press , News With a Christian Perspective

Among those issuing statements condemning the killing were representatives of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, National Right to Life Committee, Americans United for Life, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, Concerned Women for America, Care Net, Susan B. Anthony List, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, American Life League, Operation Rescue, Christian Defense Coalition, 40 Days for Life, Stand True, Priests for Life and Pro-life Action League.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Follow Jack and Charmaine on Twitter, @jackyoest and @charmaineyoest


Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted on the Tiller Killing
in US News & World Report, CNN

June 1, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Americans United for Life issued a statement on the killing of Tiller who performed third trimester abortions,

Washington, DC - Americans United for Life President and CEO, Dr. Charmaine Yoest, issued the following statement to address the murder of Dr. George Tiller: 


"We condemn this lawless act of violence. The foundational right to life that our work is dedicated to extends to everyone. Whoever is responsible for this reprehensible violence must be brought to justice under the law."

Alert Readers who follow us on Twitter, jackyoest and charmaineyoest, know that AUL is saying very little out of respect for the Tiller family left behind.


USN&WR
has George Tiller Murder Knocks a Burgeoning Antiabortion Movement Back on Its Heels, by Dan Gilgoff,

It's too early to tell if the killing will halt the antiabortion movement's recent momentum....[I look forward to reading if our friend Dan Gilgoff would ever be able to buck his editor's style book requirement of using 'anti-abortion' rather than 'pro-life.']

According to news reports, Kansas police have apprehended Kansan Scott Roeder, an abortion opponent, as a possible suspect in the murder. "Roeder is most definitely not part of the pro-life movement," said Charmaine Yoest, Americans United for Life president and CEO, in an E-mail message this morning.

CBN has Pro-life Leaders Respond to Tiller Shooting, with a review of Pro-Life reactions.

CNN reports, Obama, others condemn Kansas abortion doctor's killing

Zenit reports, Pro-life Groups Denounce Murder of Abortionist, Condemn Attack as Contrary to Goals of Promoting Human Dignity

Kay Steiger at Campus Progress, writes Rebirth of Anti-Abortion Terrorism, The murder of Dr. George Tiller in Kansas brings back old memories of radicalized violence against abortion providers. As much as Your Business Blogger(R) and Your Business Professor loves academia, the children at Campus Progress, like most academics, are wrong. Kay is a bit confused about terrorism-- and has yet to learn the difference between acts of war and criminal acts. The unfortunate Kay is still suffering from the Bush Derangement Syndrome where she pokes fun at the past president,

Opinions: "I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them." -George W. Bush

Who cares anymore?

Houston Belief

See The Moderate Voice

The Huffington Post has Cristina Page writing, The Murder of Dr. Tiller, a Foreshadowing

Tiller Murder a Lawless Act of Violence

Be sure to follow us daily on Twitter.


Listen to Charmaine on NPR on the Sotomayor Nomination

May 29, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Alert Readers following on Twitter know that Charmaine was interviewed on NPR yesterday. Did Nina Totenberg actually say "Pro-Life" and not "Anti-Abortion"?

Maybe the media is a-moving? Becoming, well, fair and balanced...?

Not likely. Michael Medved author of Hollywood vs America reminds us that journalists in the Main Stream Media began their descent into bias when they turned into Truth Tellers rather than Reporters of Fact.

The truth is, of course, what the liberals think it is. And liberals are usually wrong.

Listen to the interview here on Obama's Supreme Court Nomination, Sotomayor.

So why do Hollywood and the newspapers -- going broke -- continue to produce product against American values (including that business drive to make a profit)? Read Making Money vs Making a Movie.


Media Alert: Charmaine FOX Video;
Quoted in The Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, WorldNetDaily, CQ

May 28, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

The Sotomayor nomination: Charmaine taped ABC and is scheduled for CNN tonight at 8pm. The humidity is down, but will her hair stay up? The Big Question.

Follow us on Twitter; jackyoest & charmaineyoest

Charmaine on FOX debating abortion and
incremental sonogram legislation.

In The Washington Post, Battle Lines Are Drawn On Sotomayor Nomination; Ideology, Abortion and Remarks on Ethnicity Come to Fore; Washington Community Reacts to Sotomayor; Members of the Washington community give their opinion on Obama's decision to nominate Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, By Robert Barnes, Washington Post, Staff Writer, Thursday, May 28, 2009,

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, described Sotomayor as a "radical pick." But Yoest acknowledged that Sotomayor's most notable ruling on abortion was on the conservative side. In the ruling, she said the Bush administration had the right to prohibit abortions by overseas organizations receiving U.S. funding, as well as the right to prohibit the groups from speaking out against the restrictions.

Yoest said Sotomayor was following the court's precedents, something she might not do if she were on the Supreme Court. "There is no doubt that Judge Sotomayor's philosophy is that she is not only a practitioner of activism, but a defender of it," she said.
...
On the other side of the debate, Northup's concern is just the opposite. "That decision certainly doesn't suggest she's a judicial activist," [Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights] said, adding that her organization knows of no instance in which Sotomayor has talked about Roe or expressed support for abortion rights. "We don't want any Souters, either," she said. The reference was to retiring Justice David H. Souter, whose jurisprudence surprised his advocates once he joined the court...

From The Chicago Tribune on line, Abortion views hard to judge; Rights activists fear Sotomayor not in their court

"What we know about her we like, but I don't know the answer on abortion rights," Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, said in an interview.

Abortion opponents say they are convinced Sotomayor is an "extreme" supporter of abortion, although several acknowledge they do not have specific evidence of her views.

"She is a radical pick that divides America," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.

WND CHANGING OF THE GUARD, Limbaugh: Obama's judicial pick a 'racist' Criticizes comment that Hispanic woman can make better decisions than white male, Posted: May 26, 2009, By Bob Unruh, © 2009 WorldNetDaily,

Charmaine Yoest, chief of Americans United for Life, said the nomination torches any statements by Obama he wants "common ground" over the abortion war.

"A vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor as the next Supreme Court Justice is a vote to strip Americans of the ability to choose for themselves how to regulate abortion. Our recent polling data speaks to this point of judicial activism and as a woman, I don't believe she 'represents' American women," she said.

"The Supreme Court took on the role of the 'National Abortion Control Board' in 1973 with Roe vs. Wade, and Judge Sotomayor will further entrench the court's self-appointed role as the sole arbiter of abortion policy. Based on her judicial philosophy, she will work to elevate unrestricted, unregulated, and taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand to a fundamental constitutional right by reading the sweeping Freedom of Choice Act - also known as FOCA - into the Constitution," she continued.



Join Fight FOCA

Fearful of Latino Losses, GOP Cautious with Sotomayor
By Jonathan Allen, CQ Staff,

That emotion was clear in the reactions of conservative interest groups to the nomination.

"This appointment would provide a pedestal for an avowed judicial activist to impose her personal policy and beliefs onto others from the bench at a time when the courts are at a crossroad and critical abortion regulations -- supported by the vast majority of Americans -- like partial-birth abortion and informed consent laws lie in the balance," said Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life, a group that opposes abortion. Other conservative groups called Sotomayor a radical judicial activist -- words that in battles past have been used to rally core supporters, yet neutral toward Hispanics, just like the strategists recommend.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:
Brayton gives voice and ink to the position that Roe was well reasoned. Not many liberals even assume that position any longer.
Sotomayor and Judges Making "Policy"
Posted on: May 28, 2009 9:09 AM, by Ed Brayton


The point is that the line between interpreting the law and making policy is not nearly as clear as conservatives want people to think. Indeed, here is a textbook example of what conservatives really mean when they say a judge should not "set policy" from Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life, speaking about Sotomayor:

"She believes the role of the court is to set policy which is exactly the philosophy that led to the Supreme Court turning into the National Abortion Control Board denying the American people to right to be heard on this critical issue," Yoest said. "This appointment would provide a pedestal for an avowed judicial activist to impose her personal policy and beliefs onto others from the bench at a time when the courts are at a crossroad and critical abortion regulations - supported by the vast majority of Americans - like partial-birth abortion and informed consent laws lie in the balance."

They think that Roe v Wade was an example of "making policy" but that simply isn't true. Whether you agree with it or not, Roe v Wade was a decision based on the constitutionality of laws forbidding abortion. So very much like "judicial activism" and its various cognates, when conservatives talk about judges "making policy" or "legislating from the bench" all they really mean is "judges ruling in ways we don't like."

Steve Benen writing the Political Animal column at The Washington Monthly, May 28, 2009

SHE'S PRO-CHOICE, RIGHT?.... ,


Shortly after Sotomayor was introduced as the nominee, Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, quickly blasted her as "a radical pick" who "believes the role of the court is to set policy which is exactly the philosophy that led to the Supreme Court turning into the National Abortion Control Board."

What was that based on? Apparently nothing. The right assumes she's pro-choice; the left assumes she's pro-choice. But no one seems to know whether she's pro-choice or not.

David G. Savage and Peter Nicholas reporting for the LA Times,
May 28, 2009
Abortion rights groups concerned about Sotomayor's stance; Obama's Supreme Court nominee has little record on issues related to Roe vs. Wade


Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted in
Sotomayor Nomination; Watch the AP Clip

May 26, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine _AP.jpgPresident Obama nominated Judge Sotomayor and Charmaine offered an analysis of her judicial temperament.

Charmaine on AP video

Click image for YouTube

Alert Readers following us on Twitter (@JackYoest; @CharmaineYoest) know that Your Business Blogger(R) performed duties today as wheel man of the monster SUV. The Dreamer filled the assignment as executive assistant as Charmaine did a number of media interviews across Your Nation's Capital.

But the real issue: How does Charmaine's hair look on camera? It was a humid mess in DC today...

Charmaine also made a number of terrific hires today at Americans United for Life. Announcements to follow.

Some of her media hits include;

The Associated Press

Sotomayor: A liberal record _ but not entirely so


The Associated Press

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, called Sotomayor "a radical pick that divides America." The most controversial civil rights lawsuit ...



Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court


CNN International - USA

Charmaine Yoest, head of Americans United for Life, ripped Obama's choice of Sotomayor, calling it "a radical pick that divides America. ...




Some Voices Rise Against Sotomayor's Nomination


ABC News - USA

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, the president of Americans United for Life, calls Sotomayor "a radical pick that divides America. She believes the role of the Court is ...


The Rational Hysterics


Newsweek - USA

And even though Sotomayor has decided only a single abortion case (against the abortion-rights side) Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life ...


re: National Abortion Control Board - Kathryn Jean Lopez - Bench ...


By benchmemos@nationalreview.com


Tuesday, May 26, 2009. re: National Abortion Control Board [Kathryn Jean Lopez]. I think Charmaine Yoest probably won't be a surrogate for the RNC on this issue. 05/26 10:43 AM · Share ...

title="http://bench.nationalreview.com/">
Bench Memos - http://bench.nationalreview.com/



Sotomayor Blurs Lines in Abortion War


U.S. News & World Report - Washington,DC,USA

"She is a radical pick that divides America," Americans United for Life said this morning. "She believes the role of the court is to set policy, ...


See all stories on this topic


SaddleBrooke Democrats » Blog Archive » Neo-cons begin the nay ...



Charmaine Yoest, the president of Americans United for Life, blasted Sotomayor as "a radical pick that divides America." The Judicial Confirmation Network circulated a memo from its counsel, Wendy Long, calling Sotomayor a "favorite of ...

title="http://www.saddlebrookedemocrats.org/">
SaddleBrooke Democrats - http://www.saddlebrookedemocrats.org/



TONY PHYRILLAS: 'Avowed Judicial Activist Judge Who Undermines ...


By TONY PHYRILLAS


From Americans United for Life (AUL) President & CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest: "A vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor as the next Supreme Court Justice is a vote to strip Americans of the ability to choose for themselves how to regulate abortion ...

title="http://tonyphyrillas.blogspot.com/">
TONY PHYRILLAS - http://tonyphyrillas.blogspot.com/



Sotomayor: A liberal record _ but not entirely so - Kansas City Star

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, called Sotomayor "a radical pick that divides America."</p><p>The most controversial civil rights lawsuit of her time as a judge concerns the race discrimination claims of white ...

title="http://www.kansascity.com/153/index.xml">
Kansas City Star: Politics - http://www.kansascity.com/153/index.xml



Obama Supreme Court Pick Lacks Abortion History, but Criticized ...


By lsn@LifeSiteNews.com


Americans United for Life (AUL) President & CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest responded to the nomination, saying, "For all the President's talk of finding 'common ground,' this appointment completely contradicts that hollow promise. ...

title="http://www.lifesite.net/">
LifeSiteNews.com Headlines - http://www.lifesite.net/



Is Sotomayor an Abortion Centrist? (Updated) - Steven Waldman


By Steve Waldman


"She believes the role of the Court is to set policy which is exactly the philosophy that led to the Supreme Court turning into the National Abortion Control Board," said the group's president, Charmaine Yoest. ...

title="http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/">
Steven Waldman - http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/



Opposing Views: THEY SAID WHAT?: Mixed Reactions Pour in on Obama ...

Charmaine Yoest, president, Americans United for Life "(Sotomayor) brings a lifelong commitment to equality, justice and opportunity, as well as the respect of her peers, unassailable integrity, and a keen intellect informed by ...

title="http://www.opposingviews.com/">
Opposing Views - Issues, Experts,... - http://www.opposingviews.com/



PCC List: Majority of Americans Believe Abortion Hurts Women


By Michele Shoun


In a new national survey conducted by the Polling Company for the pro-life organization Americans United for Life, 68 percent said they know a woman who had one while 30 percent said they did not. Of those who knew a post-abortive woman ...

title="http://pcclist.blogspot.com/">
PCC List - http://pcclist.blogspot.com/



BrothersJudd Blog: AN EASY RIDE:

"She is a radical pick that divides America," Americans United for Life said this morning. [...] Despite the purported outrage by conservative groups, Sotomayor's thin record on abortion is most likely a relief to those groups--and may ...

title="http://brothersjuddblog.com/">
BrothersJudd Blog - http://brothersjuddblog.com/



Continue Reading »

Americans United for Life Makes Big Hire: Bill Saunders

May 23, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Well published and very expensive, Harvard JD, Bill Saunders has just been hired by Americans United for Life.

AUL's, president and CEO, Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D., says,


We were lucky to get him.

The press release,

By Melanie Johnson | May 22, 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC -- William L. "Bill" Saunders today joined Americans United for Life (AUL) as Senior Counsel. Mr. Saunders will be leading the development of an international edition of AUL's definitive legal guide Defending Life and contributing to AUL's work on bioethics, rights of conscience, and end of life issues.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President & CEO said: "I am very pleased Bill is joining our team. As a Harvard-trained attorney with extensive publications and a prominent reputation in the pro-life movement, Bill's addition is a strategic move for AUL as we head into our next phase of development. He will be an important resource for us as we move toward the coming Supreme Court nomination."

Mr. Saunders said: "It is a great honor to be a part of AUL, an organization with a reputation for excellence and unparalleled expertise. Working to expand the protection of human life beyond our national borders and to provide more resources to pro-life allies around the globe is a significant venture. This new project is critical as we see the targeted threats to life growing internationally."

Mr. Saunders was featured in Harvard's first Guide to Conservative Public Interest Law in 2003, and again in the 2008 edition, and he served on Harvard's Advisory Committee for its 2008 celebration of public interest law.

He speaks and writes frequently on international law and life-related topics such as stem cell research and cloning. He has submitted testimony on several occasions to the President's Council on Bioethics and has briefed Congressional staff multiple times on stem cell research and cloning. He delivered the annual J. Michael Miller Lecture at the University of St. Thomas (on international law) in February 2007, the annual R. Wayne Kraft Memorial Lecture (on bioethics) at DeSales University in February 2004, and the annual James Moore Lecture (on Sudan) at Millikin University in 1999. He has also lectured, and/or has been published, in many countries, including Italy, Germany, Poland, Slovakia, Mexico, Qatar, Malaysia, Romania, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom.

President Bush appointed Mr. Saunders to serve on the United States delegation to the UN Special Session on Children in 2001-2002. In 2004, he served on the NGO Working Committee in connection with the Doha Intergovernmental Conference for the Family. He served on the organizing committee for the conferences of the World Congress of Families in Mexico City (2004), in Poland (2007), in Amsterdam (2009), and is a member of that organization's Management Committee.

Mr. Saunders served previously as Senior Fellow, Human Rights Counsel, and Director of the Center for Human Life and Bioethics at the Family Research Council. He has also practiced law with the firm Covington and Burling and taught law at the Catholic University of America. A member of the Supreme Court bar, he has authored numerous legal briefs in state and federal (and foreign) courts.

Follow us on Twitter: @jackyoest @charmaineyoest


Abortion Should Be Legal, But...

May 22, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

If any statement has the conjunctive 'but' in the middle -- what follows the 'but' is more important than what precedes the 'but.'

Most Americans are not a yes or no on abortion but -- but! on a continuum.

Nancy Gibbs at Time magazine notes this challenge; the simple bogus binary choice,

Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

And suggests more nuance is needed.

So Americans United for Life is giving Time news some nuance, a Plan B, so to say: To get from Binary to But.

Charmaine first noticed this when she saw the Gallup Poll showing that 51percent of Americans are self-identified Pro-Life. But, but, when she drilled down thru the numbers the cross tabs didn't change.

In 1975 abortion:

22 percent illegal in all cases

21 percent legal in all cases

54 percent legal under certain conditions

In 2009 abortion:

22 percent illegal in all cases

23 percent legal in all cases

53 percent legal under certain conditions

The numbers really haven't changed.

In 1995 Gallup added another question, "With respect to the abortion issue, would you consider yourself to be pro-choice or pro-life?"

(The Alert Reader will notice the order in the choices...)

In 1995 only 33 percent of Americans self-identified as Pro-Life.

Today in 2009, 51 percent are Pro-Life.

But, but, this was the only number that really changed.

51 percent are Pro-Life, but, but, 76 percent want abortion legal under some circumstances.

Your Business Blogger(R) had to take graduate statistics twice to earn a Gentleman's C B, so even this numbers novice can see that there is some over lap of Americans who are both Pro-Life but, but want abortion legal.

Obama might be confused when life begins in the womb. But he has company in his confusion: most Americans are confused when/if/why it ends in the womb -- We are Pro-Life but, but Abortion should be legal.

Would it be true, as one political wag winced, The masses are @sses?

No, but.

But we are nuanced.

***

Charmaine Yoest, with her doctorate in political science from Mr. Jefferson's University, commissioned a scientific poll to get to the nuanced granularity of the American Public.

Her findings as president and CEO of Americans United for Life did not surprise her. And, indeed, confirmed sub-trends that now have a majority of Americans as Pro-Life.

Americans have always wanted commonsense oversight of abortion.

So let's combine a premise and an outcome, a but not binary statement, to give Time's Nancy Gibbs the nuance we all need. Here's what Charmaine's poll found,

Gallup: Abortion should be legal.

Most Americans
, Abortion should be legal, but...

Americans United for Life: Abortion is legal but...


...Not in the third trimester.

...Not with my tax dollars.

...I won't pay for them overseas.

...I better know if my daughter is having one.

...Law makers should make abortion law, not judges.

...There must be some restrictions.

Americans overwhelmingly want some restrictions on abortion. They will oppose any Judicial nominee who will legislate from the bench lifting any regulation to codify Abortion on Demand.

Obama will suffer a severe loss in power and popularity if he nominates a judge who will permit the removal of commonsense regulation of abortion. A judge who advocates FOCA by stealth will have a real battle on her hands.

And as the pro-choice activists say, Pro-Lifers take no prisoners.

***

For over forty years, Americans United for Life has been working on incremental changes in law, state-by-state to protect women's health and well being.

And to collaterally save a few children.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Oklahoma recently passed legislation forbidding sex-selection abortion. India and China routinely abort first-born baby girls. (I married a first-born girl -- I've got one too. They are really quite useful...) The citizens of Oklahoma don't think this is a good idea and passes a commonsense law. Planned Parenthood is not happy and supports abortion on demand for any reason. The Supreme Court of the United States will overturn this law if Obama gets a radical on the court. Full Disclosure: AUL assisted in the legal crafting of this bill. See LifeNews.

From The Washington Post, Nancy Northup, president of The Center for Reproductive Rights, called the [AUL] campaign "a relentless anti-choice attack that is consistent with what their strategy has always been: to take no prisoners.''

Follow us on Twitter.


Supreme Litmus Test: The Constitution;
Americans Don't Want Activists as Justices

May 21, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

constitution_we_the_people.gifAmericans United for Life commissioned a scientific poll -- outrageously expensive -- to learn what the public wants in a Justice sitting on the Supreme Court.

It would appear that the public would not want any nominee Obama might uncover. Alert Readers will recall that Obama said that the Constitution,

"reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day...

The original Constitution as well as the Civil War Amendments...But I think it is an imperfect document, and I think it is a document that reflects some deep flaws in American culture, the Colonial culture nascent at that time."

Nothing is perfect on this side of eternity. If the Constitution is to be 'made perfect' or 'de-flawed' the founding framers put an amendment process in place to ratify any changes -- the states do this -- not the Justices. Not the Executive Branch embodied in Obama, but the legislators.

Americans do not want Justices legislating. Goodness, we don't even want Congress legislating...

Americans want fidelity to the Constitution.

Charmaine's letter to the Senators follows with the top line data.

***

May 21, 2009

Dear Senators:

As we await President Obama's announcement of his choice to fill the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy created by Justice David Souter's retirement, new polling data reveal that Americans want Justices who disavow politics and who will uphold the Constitution and the rule of law as written, including on issues involving abortion.

By overwhelming majorities, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents agreed that judges should exercise restraint and check their own beliefs and predispositions at the courthouse door. They agreed on upholding common sense abortion regulations already in place in the states, including parental consent laws, and objecting to late-term abortions and taxpayer-funded abortions in the U.S. and overseas. Further, this consensus was held even among Americans who self-described themselves as "pro-choice."

For example, on the role of federal judges, majorities of self-identified Republicans, Independents, and Democrats:

* Agreed that "When considering a new Justice for the United States Supreme Court, I would prefer that my United States Senators look for a man or woman who will interpret the law as it is written and not take into account his or her personal viewpoints and experiences."

(Agreement: 92% of Republicans, 86% of Independents, 84% of Democrats, 91% of conservatives, 85% of moderates, 80% of liberals)

These same majorities were in vast agreement on abortion regulations as they:

* Opposed a nominee who "Supports late-term abortions, which are abortions in the 7th, 8th, or 9th months of pregnancy, and are also known as 'Partial-Birth Abortions.'"

(Opposition: 89% of Republicans, 78% of Independents, 77% of Democrats, 89% of conservatives, 80% of moderates, and 67% of liberals)

* Opposed a nominee who "Opposes making it illegal for someone to take a girl younger than the age of 18 across state lines to obtain abortions without her parents' knowledge."

(73% of Republicans, 74% of Independents, 62% of Democrats, 73% of conservatives, 67% of moderates, 59% of liberals)

* Opposed a nominee who "Favors using tax dollars to pay for abortions here in the United States."

(Opposition: 86% of Republicans, 67% of Independents, 61% of Democrats, 86% of conservatives, 62% of moderates, 54% of liberals)

* Opposed a nominee who "Favors using tax dollars to pay for abortions in other countries."

(Opposition: 97% of Republicans, 86% of Independents, 84% of Democrats, 95% of conservatives, 87% of moderates, 76% of liberals)

* Opposed a nominee who "believes that the Courts, and not the voters or elected officials, should make policies on abortion in the United States."

(78% of Republicans, 65% of Independents, 69% of Democrats, 75% of conservatives, 71% of moderates, 65% of liberals)

Significantly, the majority of Americans of all political and ideological cohorts expressed opposition to a suggested federal law that abolishes restrictions on abortions (including 93% of Republicans, 69% of Independents, and 72% of Democrats, 88% of conservatives, 77% of moderates, and 62% of liberals.)

This unnamed law is the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), a law that our next Justice could rule upon in an upcoming term of the U.S. Supreme Court. Fully nine-in-ten Americans who identified with a pro-life position on the six-point scale (90%) and 65% who selected a pro-choice stance on the same spectrum were dissatisfied with this potential legislation.

Finally, when asked whether the next Justice should be a man or a woman, the tri-partisan consensus also volunteered that it does not matter (79% of Republicans, 78% of Independents, 61% of Democrats, 78% of conservatives, 67% of moderates, and 62% of liberals -- as well as 66% of women.)

Senators, we urge you to take these clear findings into consideration before you vote on the President's nominee and recognize that the majority of your constituents -- regardless of political party -- fervently oppose any type of judicial activism that would rescind common sense laws on abortion and its regulations.

Sincerely,

Dr. Charmaine Yoest
President & CEO
Americans United for Life

###

Follow us on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest


Memo to Senate Members:
What do Americans Want in the Next Supreme Court Justice?
New Polling Data Reveal Answers

| By Jack Yoest

MEDIA ADVISORY

TELE-NEWS CONFERENCE

Memo to Senate Members: What do Americans Want in the Next Supreme Court Justice?
New Polling Data Reveal Answers

WHAT

Tele-News Conference to share a memo from Americans United for Life (AUL) urging all members of the Senate to consider fresh polling data on what Americans want in the next Supreme Court Justice. The data show that while the U.S. is supposedly a "divided" nation on the issue of abortion, overwhelming majorities of Americans agree on numerous issues relevant to the selection of a Supreme Court Justice, including:

· The role of interpreting the law vs. judicial activism based on personal viewpoints and opinion

· The role of states in regulating abortion

· Agreement/disagreement with positions held by potential nominees on

o Late term abortion

o Tax dollars paying for abortion

o Parental notification/consent before abortion

· Demographic preferences such as desired gender of the next Justice

The data also detail the political party, past voting record and demographic make-up of those polled. Q&A will follow a brief discussion of the poll findings.

WHO

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, President of Americans United for Life (AUL) (www.AUL.org)

Kellyanne Conway, President of The Polling Company, Inc. (www.PollingCompany.com)


WHERE

Tele-News Conference

For dial-in phone number and pass code to attend, contact:

Colleen O'Boyle (ext. 122) or Arina Grossu (ext. 104) at (703) 683-5004


WHEN Thursday, May 21st

10:00 AM ET


Americans United for Life Ready
for the Obama Supreme Court Nominee

May 20, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

AUL will be conducting a press conference tomorrow, Thursday. It's going to be good.

Americans United for Life has released a review of the potential Supreme Court Nominees.

The concern of AUL, the country's oldest Pro-Life public interest law firm, is that nominees might be "empathetic" to petitioners to the Supreme Court -- rather than honoring the Justices' oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution."

Your Business Blogger(R) served as an Armored Cavalry Officer and at commissioning -- becoming an officer and gentleman -- also took an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution." The oath of commissioned military officers is to the document not to the president -- to a piece of paper, not to a person.

(It quite literally took an act of Congress to make Your Business Blogger (R) a gentleman...)

None of Obama's short list of nominees seem to understand this distinction on the job of a Supreme Court Justice: To be faithful to the Constitution and NOT to show "empathy" to any person or case before the Court.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Get on Twitter and follow Jack and Charmaine, @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest

Read America's Unsettled Conscience on Abortion.

Visit Ultrasound Technology, Laws Credited for Pro-life Shift.

Lots of Links and good writing at Roundup: Obama Starts Conversations with Potential Supreme Court Picks.

Ultrasound technology and laws credited for pro-life shift,
quotes Charmaine; always a good idea...

DEACON FOR LIFE

Read how numbers can be presented, Slight Majority Of U.S. Residents Call Themselves 'Pro-life;' 76% Say Abortion Should Be Legal, Poll Shows.

Conservatives, Interest Groups Gear Up for SCotUS Battle


New Gallup Poll Says Majority of Americans are Pro-Life
, By Focus on the Family

Saint Luke, "Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative...", Life and the Supreme Court

The Oath of office


Media Alert: Charmaine on FOX Why Does USA Poll Pro-Life?
& Abortion Debate Intensifes in National Journal

May 19, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine recently appeared on FOX discussing the shift in polling -- America is now 51 percent Pro-Life according to Gallup:



Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D. on FOX

Charmaine was also interviewed for National Journal,

Abortion Debate Intensifies, Awaits Nominee
, Tuesday, By Amy Harder, May 19, 2009

Abortion has re-emerged as a hot issue, and if history is any indication, it will get even hotter when President Obama makes his Supreme Court nomination.

Obama -- who first spoke out for a nominee with "empathy" before a Planned Parenthood audience in 2007 -- rekindled conservatives' wariness over the weekend with his speech at the University of Notre Dame, calling for "fair-minded" dialogue and "common ground."

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, found Obama's speech at Notre Dame troubling in light of the names at the top of his short list. "He continues to want to use rhetoric to describe a mythical common ground while at the same time pursuing a real radical actual agenda," Yoest said. Her group recently released a report criticizing possible nominees such as Solicitor General Elena Kagan, appellate judges Sonia Sotomayor and Diane Wood, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and outgoing Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Follow Jack and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest

Pro-Life Group Details Pro-Abortion Views of Likely Obama Supreme Court Picks, by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor, May 19, 2009,

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A leading pro-life legal group has compiled a detailed analysis of the pro-abortion views of the several leading contenders from which President Barack Obama is expected to pick the next Supreme Court justice.

Americans United for Life indicates pro-life advocates should expect a fierce battle over abortion with virtually any of the leading candidates.

Read, AUL's short list for justice, with two notes to readers...


Media Alert: Charmaine on FOX News;
Article up on Human Events

May 18, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

charmaine_obamacon_me_yoest.pngCharmaine is scheduling to appear on FOX today -- taped interview on the recent Gallup poll on 51 percent Pro-Life finding and probable Supreme Court nominees. Hit times will be tonight and possibly through out the day.

Also see her article in Human Events,

Obama's Short List of Abortion Supporters, by Charmaine Yoest, [Ph.D.] 05/18/2009

Americans are used to hearing nominees for the Supreme Court carefully hedge their answers to any question related to Roe v. Wade and abortion. This reflects a political reality in which any hint of sympathy toward defending unborn life in the law spells confirmation challenges for a potential nominee.

In contrast, this political reality does not exist for those committed to an abortion-rights ideology. A study Americans United for Life released this week examining the life-related views of President Obama's rumored "short-list" for the Supreme Court documents demonstrated on-the-record evidence of the potential nominees' pro-abortion opinions expressed consistently and without hesitation.

charmaine_wnd.jpg

Read the entire article here.

Follow us on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest

Also see America is Pro-Life.


Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted In LA Times
51% identify as 'pro-life' in U.S.
Why The Change?

May 16, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

The household of Your Business Blogger(R) has been involved in a number of studies -- commissioning statistical polling.

A number of years ago, Charmaine's dissertation centered on data gathered with a $230,000 budget. To pass academic peer-reviewed scrutiny, she was most careful in 'framing questions' to get unbiased responses. And she had an expert team study the study so that all the actors involved in the questioning understood the questions.

The Little Woman knows statistical sampling and polling pit-falls.

It was of great interest to learn about the new Gallup poll showing a move of America from Pro-Choice to Pro-Life. Reporters began calling.

Charmaine did an outstanding interview with the LA Times reporter, Robin Abcarian, who was engaging and fair. (I know this 'cause I was driving while they talked on the phone...) The interview follows later.

I wanted to know more on the cause of the dramatic shift to America's current Pro-Life self-identification. So I asked Charmaine, Why such a big change?

This passes for pillow talk in our house...

She says that America has always been Pro-Life and there are four reasons for the poll shift:

Reframing Pro-Choice,
Obama Backlash,
Advances in Technology,
Financial Independence

Reframing Pro-Choice

How polling questions are framed can prompt a particular answer. But this was not the challenge of Gallup: They have asked the same question for years. The issue may well be the question itself. It seems that the public is beginning to understand when an abortion occurs -- in which trimester -- is important to being Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Choice in this black and white question. No shade of gray.

So. If a Pro-Choicer recoils at partial birth abortion, as do all normal humans, can she still be Pro-Choice? The question (and Cecile Richards at Planned Parenthood) does not allow this.

Or, more likely, if the Pro-Choicer is confused about any abortion after viability, is she no longer Pro-Choice? Maybe. If I am not Pro-Choice, then I am Pro-Life.

Charmaine's work reminds us that most Americans have always been Pro-life. But only now have the extremists of the Pro-Choicer agenda -- of abortion on demand -- pushed the public out of the comfortable gray area -- the mushy middle -- into a stark admission: I am not a part of any group who holds for partial birth abortion.

The public perception -- the shifting of the frame of the question -- changed.

It was: Yes, I am Pro-Choice because a woman can abort her baby in the first trimester.


It is: No, I am not Pro-Choice because there is no reason to abort in the third trimester.

The shift was not in the framing of the question but in the understanding of when the abortion was taking place during the pregnancy.

This demonstrates that the incremental strategy of changing law state-by-state in universal, common-sense regulation is what all Americans want. The incremental strategy of Americans United for Life is working.

Obama Backlash

This is why Planned Parenthood was so insistent that Candidate Obama push and pass The Freedom of Choice Act or FOCA. This law would kill all incremental controls passed by local lawmakers on abortion. The public is not happy with the extremism of the current Executive Order allowing Federal funding for abortions overseas. Americans don't want to pay for abortions in any country.

Americans do not want to pay for any abortion bailout.

President Obama has installed radical pro-abortion political appointees to implement Planned Parenthood's abortion on demand agenda -- abortion at any place; at any time; for any reason; at taxpayer expense. People don't like this. This makes self-identification as Pro-Choice unpalatable.

The Obama Backlash began when Jill Stanek documented his position against Infants Born Alive. What politician dare be against legislation protecting infants born alive?

Advances in Technology


Four Dimension Sonogram
-- where the mother can watch her baby move about in real time. 85% of women who see the sonogram do not go through with a planned abortion -- which is why Planned Parenthood doesn't care for the science of the sonogram: It kills profits.

Babies can now survive at very young stages. Years ago Your Business Blogger(R) worked with aggressive technologies to help neonates with underdeveloped lungs to 'breathe' and to live. The public understands the new survival rates and is beginning to understand the illogical of aborting a child who could, today, survive outside the womb, where, a few years ago, could not.

Financial Independence

Most legal scholars -- even Obama short-listers -- agree that Roe v Wade was poorly reasoned and poorly decided. Even back then, the Justices cited a compelling state interest against third trimester abortions.

But recent Supreme Court cases have shifted from the healthy viability of the baby to the financial viability of the mother, a "reliance interest." The Court has now ruled that abortion is necessary so that women can break the glass ceiling.

And this is why liberals are so unhappy with Sarah Palin: She could have lotsa babies and still be a governor. Palin proves that financial success is compatible with motherhood (X 5).

(No, it is not easy. Do not just drop by our house unless you want to help do laundry...)

51% identify as 'pro-life' in U.S. It's the first time the Gallup Poll finds 'pro-choice' outweighed -- at 42% -- and a near-reversal of last year's figures,
By Robin Abcarian,May 16, 2009

At a time when President Obama is trying to convince opponents in the abortion battle that they can find middle ground -- in rhetoric, if not reality -- a new Gallup Poll shows that more Americans describe themselves as "pro-life" than "pro-choice."

For the first time since it began asking the question in 1995, Gallup reported Friday, a majority of adults questioned for its annual survey on values and beliefs -- 51% -- said that when it comes to abortion, they consider themselves "pro-life"; 42% consider themselves "pro-choice." (The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.)

...antiabortion activists think they have more than the new poll on their side. "This isn't new," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. "It tracks pretty much with what we've always known: People generally are pro-life depending on how you ask the question."

But Yoest said abortion foes were not placated. "There has been such an avalanche of pro-abortion activity that it's jaw-dropping. It's not just that his rhetoric doesn't square with reality; the gap is Grand Canyon-size. I think this administration has fundamentally miscalculated how out of step they are with the American people."

robin.abcarian@latimes.com




Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:
From the Gallup organization,

May 15, 2009, More Americans "Pro-Life" Than "Pro-Choice" for First Time
Also, fewer think abortion should be legal "under any circumstances,"
by Lydia Saad

PRINCETON, NJ -- A new Gallup Poll, conducted May 7-10, finds 51% of Americans calling themselves "pro-life" on the issue of abortion and 42% "pro-choice." This is the first time a majority of U.S. adults have identified themselves as pro-life since Gallup began asking this question in 1995.

Follow us on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest


Media Alert: Americans United for Life Announces Legal Prospectus on Probable Supreme Court Nominees

May 15, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Today, Americans United for Life, AUL, Announces Legal Prospectus on Probable Supreme Court Nominees

Washington, DC -- Americans United for Life (AUL) announces today a new legal prospectus on the probable "short list" of President Obama's Supreme Court nominees, and their records on life issues. AUL is the nation's first national pro-life organization and the leading legal and public policy organization in the pro-life movement.

The comprehensive, concise document identifies nine probable nominees and highlights cases, past writings, opinions, and arguments indicating affinities for pro-abortion activism. In addition, it explains how past interpretations by some of the individuals could be applied to future rulings on life issues. The prospectus also identifies personal endorsements of and political contributions to extreme, pro-abortion activist groups.

For example, Solicitor General Elena Kagan tops many 'short-lists' and yet she has publicly and repeatedly criticized federal regulations that prohibit federally funded abortion counseling. Kagan argues that the regulations amount to the subsidization of "anti-abortion" speech. Another short-list topper, Judge Diane Wood, has disputed the constitutionality of partial-birth abortion bans enacted in Illinois and Wisconsin.

To access the prospectus, visit: http://www.aul.org/ussc_potentials


Follow Jack and Charmaine on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest

Tony Mauro at The Blog of Legal Times writes, Anti-Abortion Rights Group: Thumbs Down For Supreme Court Short List,

Americans United for Life, a leading anti-abortion rights group, has issued a negative appraisal of many of the presumed short-list possible nominees to replace retiring Justice David Souter. The group's analysis seems to guarantee that abortion rights will become a rallying cry in the coming debate, no matter whom President Barack Obama nominates.

In a release announcing the analysis Charmaine Yoest, president of the organization, says, "The records of these potential nominees are absolutely the most radically pro-abortion our country has ever seen. Every potential nominee is pro-abortion and would advance President Obama's radical agenda." She vowed to "make the pro-life voice heard" during the confirmation process.


Americans United for Life Announces Legal Prospectus on Probable Supreme Court Nominees

More Americans are Pro-Life, Report Says
,
Americans are more pro-life than pro-abortion, according to a new Gallup poll.

The poll reveals that 51 percent of Americans call themselves pro-life while 42 percent are pro-abortion. Seven percent of respondents had no opinion on the topic.

This is the first time the pendulum has swung to the pro-life side since Gallup began conducting the poll in 1995. Last year, 50 percent considered themselves pro-abortion and 44 percent pro-life.



The Banner is Unfurled

National Journal, Under the Influence

AUL Summer Research Assistant position open

TONY PHYRILLAS, Americans United for Life: Expect pro-abortion pick for Supreme Court


Media Alert: Charmaine Interviewed in
The New York Times

May 14, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine was quoted by SHERYL GAY STOLBERG in The New York Times, On Abortion, Obama Is Drawn Into Debate He Had Hoped to Avoid, Published: May 14, 2009,


WASHINGTON -- In nearly four months in office, President Obama has pursued a careful two-pronged strategy on abortion, enacting policies that secure a woman's right to the procedure while vowing to move beyond the culture wars that have divided the nation on the issue for more than three decades.

Now, Mr. Obama is suddenly in the thick of the battle he had hoped to transcend, and his delicate balancing act is being put to the test...

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said she told allies that their movement was emerging from "eight years in the wilderness."

But even as Mr. Obama has delighted abortion rights advocates, he has dialed back some earlier ambitions. In 2007, he promised Planned Parenthood that "the first thing I'd do as president" would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which effectively codifies Roe v. Wade...

But religious conservatives and more ardent abortion opponents who have not been included say Mr. Obama is trying to have it both ways. Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, an advocacy group, said that if the president really wanted to forge consensus, he would advocate rules allowing parents to be notified if their teenage daughters sought an abortion and banning the procedure known as partial-birth abortion. As an Illinois state senator, Mr. Obama voted "present" on such initiatives, enabling their defeat....

Tiny URL http://tiny.cc/7R0QO

Follow us on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest


Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted in
National Journal, Internet Impact on the
Supreme Court Nomination

| By Jack Yoest

Amy Harder, writing at the National Journal, interviewed Charmaine on the on-line battle on the up-coming Supreme Court Nomination. Also see nice quote from David All.

Online SCOTUS Rumble Sets Stage For Nomination Fight
Interest Groups And Media Observers Weigh In On What Influence The Internet Will Have On Upcoming High Court Battle
, by Amy Harder, Thursday, May 14, 2009,

Americans United For Life says it has already seen an overwhelming response from its online supporters in discussions anticipating a nominee. "We had to upgrade the back end of our computer operation because we've seen such an outpouring of interest being more active on these issues," said Charmaine Yoest, the anti-abortion group's president. Her organization echoes a common concern on the right that Obama will nominate a judicial activist who will trigger a "dramatic shift in public understanding of the role of the courts," Yoest said. "When you go down the path of accepting judicial activism as the norm, that dramatically increases the amount of power judges have."

Yoest
said her group will be ready to go right out of the gate once a nominee is announced. She said its "robust" online advocacy program, Facebook community and new IT system will mean "better, faster and cheaper" communication with supporters. "We're ready whenever they bring it out," she said. "There won't be a huge delay."

Charmaine predicts that the next Supreme Court Justice nominee will be a woman. a pro-choice, abortion advocate. See the AUL analysis here.

See Charmaine's writing on "The Woman's Chair."

Tiny URL: http://tiny.cc/YIeWC

Follow us on Twitter: @JackYoest @CharmaineYoest


Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted in
The Wall Street Journal,
Congressional Quarterly, Roll Call,
United Press International, Chicago Tribune, HotAir

May 7, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Washington Wire, Political Insight and Analysis From The Wall Street Journal's Capital Bureau, Judicial Advocacy Groups Prepare for Supreme Court Battle, Susan Davis reports on politics,

Judicial advocacy groups are already drawing battle lines for a Supreme Court fight following news that Justice David Souter will retire at the end of the term.

Americans United for Life, a group that opposes abortion rights, said they will oppose any nominee who supports the Freedom of Choice Act to "elevate abortion to a fundamental right on the same place as the freedom of speech," said president Dr. Charmaine Yoest. Adding: "Justice Souter's retirement also represents a test for the Senate: will they uphold their duty to raise serious questions over a nominee's judicial philosophy?"


Posturing on Supreme Court Pick Continues; No Selection Likely This Week
By Seth Stern, CQ Staff

Republicans warned Tuesday against rushing a Supreme Court nominee through the Senate, even as Democrats said no announcement of a successor to Justice David H. Souter would come this week.

In timing his first nomination to the nation's highest court, President Obama is balancing competing political imperatives: He needs to wait long enough that key senators in both parties feel that he seriously entertained their suggestions and weighed their advice. But waiting too long would give his conservative critics the opportunity to mobilize and to attack potential candidates pre-emptively -- making it more difficult for the Senate to confirm a new justice prior to the August recess....

Conservative activists urged Republicans not to allow Democrats to rush the process. Charmaine Yoest, [Ph.D.] president of Americans United for Life, urged Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the Judiciary Committee's new ranking Republican, "to begin your role as ranking minority member by putting the brakes on rushing through a Supreme Court nominee."

Political Fight Already Brewing Over Souter Retirement, By John Stanton, Roll Call Staff, Reports: Supreme Court Justice David Souter to Retire at End of Term

Battle lines over President Barack Obama's first Supreme Court nominee were quickly solidifying Friday morning, even as the White House and Capitol Hill continued to wait for the official word that Justice David Souter would retire this summer...

While politicians at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue may be waiting to comment until Obama receives a formal communication on Souter's intentions, interest groups were wasting no time drawing lines in the sand over a looming Senate confirmation fight.

Charmaine Yoest
, president of Americans United for Life, warned in a statement Friday morning that anti-abortion-rights organizations would vigorously oppose any nominee that interprets the Constitution to include protections for abortion.

"We will work to oppose any nominee for the Supreme Court who will read the Freedom of Choice Act into the Constitution in order to elevate abortion to a fundamental right on the same plane as the freedom of speech. In his search for a replacement for Justice Souter, President Obama should avoid a pro-abortion litmus test," Yoest said.

Marge Baker, executive vice president at People for the American Way, urged Obama to stick by his campaign pledge to tap nominees who bring a level of empathy for minorities, the poor and women.

UPI, Abortion key issue in replacing Souter,


WASHINGTON, May 3 (UPI) -- Abortion rights will occupy a prominent place in the political battle to replace U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter, say those on each side of the issue.

"Without a doubt, opponents of women's freedom and privacy will use a vacancy on the court as an opportunity to further their attacks on nominees who have taken pro-choice positions, " said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, the abortion rights group.

Difficulties encountered by several of President Barack Obama's choices for federal posts prove anti-abortion groups retain the power to derail the president's agenda, despite the Democratic majority in Congress, said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.

"This new administration and the congressional majority may support radical abortion rights, but the American people as a whole do not," Yoest said.


Supreme Court Justice David Souter: Lines drawn before anyone is chosen as a potential successor; Nominee prospects already shadowed by abortion debate, Chicago Tribune, By James Oliphant, Washington Bureau,
WASHINGTON -- A full-scale battle on Capitol Hill over the next Supreme Court nominee could still be months away, but small skirmishes have been taking place all year...

Groups that oppose abortion rights have been testing their political viability since Obama took office, and they say the difficulties encountered by Johnsen and others show they retain the power to derail the Obama agenda, despite large Democratic majorities.

"This new administration and the congressional majority may support radical abortion rights, but the American people as a whole do not," said Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life. "Canny political observers and politicians know this."

HotAir,

Pro-life group to Leahy: Reject judicial activism in Souter replacement, by Ed Morrissey,

One of the organizers of the Justice Sunday rallies in 2005 has sent a letter to the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee demanding that Patrick Leahy ensure against confirming a judicial activist to replace David Souter. Dr. Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life reminds Leahy that Americans around the country have put reasonable restrictions on abortion, and that any judge that would undo those through legislative fiat should not get sent to the highest court...



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Jack and Charmaine also blog at Reasoned Audacity. Your Business Blogger(R) of Management Training of DC, LLC, is an adjunct professor of business at the Northern Community College and is a licensed agent for the William Oncken Corporation, presenters of Managing Management Time(TM) fondly known as Monkey Management.

Tiny URL: http://tiny.cc/Z7ahw

Learn how our household learned to manage teamwork at http://tiny.cc/8SVkS


Americans United for Life Sends
Letter to Senator Leahy on Souter Vacancy

May 5, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Letter to Senator Leahy on Souter Vacancy

The following letter to Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was released on Monday.


May 4, 2009

The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Leahy:

We understand that Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, David Souter will retire at the end of the Court's current term. The President will soon send to the United States Senate a nominee to our highest court.

Americans United for Life is a public-interest law and policy organization whose vision is a nation in which everyone is welcomed in life and protected in law. We will oppose any nominee to the Court who believes social activism trumps interpreting the Constitution...

Letter at the jump.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Read Jill Stanek,


Talking smart about Obama's Supreme Court pick

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, sent a letter to Senate Democrat Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick Leahy yesterday that was pretty brilliant....

Recall President Abortion indicated during the campaign he admired Supreme Court justices Stephen Breyer and David Souter. Both are so fanatically pro-abortion they voted twice (2000 and 2007) against the Partial Birth Abortion Ban, meaning Obama supports Supremes so entrenched they will even support a barbaric abortion procedure killing a half-born baby contrary to the will of the people, since 30 states had passed PBA bans by 2000.

Of course. Obama himself opposed the PBA Ban and also infamously stated during the campaign his primary focus as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would overturn every local, state, and federal restriction made against abortion in the past 36 years....

Pro-Life Battle from TruthSeeker

Pro-Life, Pro-Abortion Groups Look to Coming Battle Over Supreme Court Pick
, by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor,

Charmaine Yoest, the president of Americans United for Life, promised her group would help lead the charge against any pro-abortion activist Obama may name to the high court.

Baptist Press on Americans United for Life.


Continue Reading »

Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted In LA Times

May 4, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine was interviewed by the LA Times.


Abortion issue looms over Supreme Court choice
Antiabortion groups have opposed Senate confirmation of Sebelius and two Justice nominees with varying success. And those activists are expected to have a voice on Obama's pick for high court.
By James Oliphant

Conservative activists have brought the most explosive weapon in their arsenal -- the issue of abortion rights -- to bear against a trio of President Obama's nominees for other posts, offering a likely preview of what to expect when Obama's choice to replace retiring Justice David H. Souter comes before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
...

"This new administration and the congressional majority may support radical abortion rights, but the American people as a whole do not," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.


AUL Comments:
Charmaine on the Souter Retirement

May 1, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Following press release was issued this morning from Americans United for Life.

Charmaine is scheduled for a number of media appearances today. Follow her on Twitter: @CharmaineYoest

Press Release: AUL Comments on Reported Retirement of Justice David Souter from the Supreme Court

By Daniel McConchie | May 1, 2009

"Pro-abortion Supreme Court nominee will read Freedom of Choice Act into the Constitution."

WASHINGTON - Major media outlets are reporting that United State Supreme Court Justice David Souter has informed the White House that he plans to retire at the end of the Court's current term.

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, President & CEO of Americans United for Life, stated, "We will work to oppose any nominee for the Supreme Court who will read the Freedom of Choice Act into the Constitution in order to elevate abortion to a fundamental right on the same plane as the freedom of speech. In his search for a replacement for Justice Souter, President Obama should avoid a pro-abortion litmus test."

Dr. Yoest continued, "This nomination represents a test for a President who has expressed a public commitment to reducing abortions while pursuing an aggressive pro-abortion agenda. Appointing an abortion radical to the Court -- someone who believes social activism trumps the Constitution - further undermines efforts to reduce abortion. In the days ahead, Justice Souter's retirement also represents a test for the Senate: will they uphold their duty to raise serious questions over a nominee's judicial philosophy?"

"The irony is that even many abortion rights supporters agree that Roe v. Wade was poorly decided," Yoest said. "One person often cited as a potential Obama pick, legal scholar Cass Sunstein, has argued that Roe 'badly overreached' and that the decision rests on shaky constitutional foundations."

Regarding Souter's tenure on the Court, Americans United for Life Senior Counsel Clarke D. Forsythe stated, "Justice David Souter is one of the most pro-abortion members of the United State Supreme Court. During his tenure, Justice Souter voted to uphold abortion on demand and to strike down common sense abortion regulations that the vast majority of Americans support. He voted in 2000 and again in 2007 to strike down prohibitions on the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion. As many votes on abortion have been 5-4 decisions, his presence on the Court has extended the tragedy of abortion by restricting the right of states to make their own decisions on abortion law."

###

About Americans United for Life: Americans United for Life (AUL) is a nonprofit, public-interest law and policy organization whose vision is a nation in which everyone is welcomed in life and protected in law. The first national pro-life organization in America, AUL has been committed to defending human life through vigorous judicial, legislative, and educational efforts at both the federal and state levels since 1971. The Wall Street Journal has profiled AUL, and PBS' Frontline program chronicled AUL's successful efforts in Mississippi.

Charmaine is scheduled for a number of media appearances today. Follow her on Twitter: @CharmaineYoest


Media Alert: Charmaine on Obama's First 100 Days on CBN

April 29, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine was interviewed by CBN reviewing president Obama's first one hundred days in office.

Obama Report Card: Evangelical Grade, Politics, CBNNews.com, April 29, 2009

CBNNews.com - The first 100 days of an administration is supposed to set the tone for a term in office and it has become a landmark and a kind of report card for modern presidents.

Watch the video on the CBN website.

###

See Personnel is Policy.


Continue Reading »

Media Alert: Charmaine Quoted in Reuters
on the Pro-Life Movement

April 23, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

"Our mailing list has exploded. ... We are also in the process of adding staff and hiring," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United For Life, a conservative organization that opposes abortion rights.

Ed Stoddard interviewed Charmaine and offered his Analysis in Reuters,

DALLAS (Reuters) - The Texas governor ponders secession from the United States, anti-tax "tea parties" are held and some states snub federal economic "stimulus" funds.

The U.S. Republican Party's conservative base is fired up and taking aim at the old target of "big government" as its opposition hardens to the agenda of President Barack Obama and a U.S. Congress controlled by his fellow Democrats.

AUL's direct competitor in the market-place of abortion law is Planned Parenthood;

Life vs. Death
AUL vs. PP
Charmaine vs. Cecile Richards.

Planned Parenthood takes in a billion dollars and some 400 million in your tax dollars for the Richards Abortion bailout.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Cecile Richards is pushing for FOCA, the Freedom of Choice Act. But even our liberal friends are fighting FOCA.

Also see Pro-Choice Democrats FightFOCA

So liberals love science? Not the science of the sonogram; read Charmaine Quoted in The Wall Street Journal;
Planned Parenthood Forbids the Science of the Sonogram


Pro-Life Legal Guide
by Americans United for Life

April 22, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

AUL, a non-profit law firm, publishes a yearly review of incremental initiatives -- model legislation -- that states can use to protect women and unborn babies.

There are some 670 laws to regulate abortion in the nation. The Freedom of Choice Act or FOCA would eliminate each of these state controls on the abortion industry.

For example, if FOCA was signed into law by Obama non-doctors across America could do abortions:


+ Any school nurse could do the abortion surgery.
+ Any school nurse could do the abortion surgery in the school clinic.
+ Any school nurse could do the abortion surgery on any school age girl.
+ Any school nurse could do the abortion surgery on any school age girl without mom knowing.
+ All abortions done by your school nurse on your little girl will be paid for with your tax dollars.

The Pro-life Legal Guide belongs in every lawyer's library.

Press Release: Americans United for Life Releases Pro-Life Legal Guide, Hosts Capitol Hill Briefing

April 22, 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Washington, DC -- Americans United for Life (AUL) today held a Capitol Hill briefing in conjunction with the release of their annually-updated legal guide, Defending Life 2009: A State-by-State Legal Guide to Abortion, Bioethics, and the End of Life.

"Defending Life 2009 offers specific, achievable opportunities to advance a pro-life agenda in individual states and in Congress. In addition, it provides essential insight and analysis on issues across the life spectrum," said Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL's President & CEO.

Representatives Eric Cantor (R-VA, Minority Whip), Doug Lamborn (R-CO), and Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) served as honorary co-hosts of today's Capitol Hill event, which was attended by members of Congress and their staffers.

Continue reading at the jump


Continue Reading »

MEDIA ALERT: Charmaine Quoted in World Net Daily MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH

April 21, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine was interviewed in WND, By Drew Zahn, Obama presidency awakens pro-life movement 'For 8 years we had President Bush and his veto pen - we don't anymore'

"There was a concern that after the president was elected, the pro-life movement would be so demoralized that it would be almost a death blow," said Charmaine Yoest, charmaine_wnd.jpgpresident and chief executive officer of Americans United for Life, the oldest national pro-life organization in the country. "But in fact, just the opposite is true."

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.

Yoest told WND that news of Obama's victory in November launched an immediate surge of pro-life activism, including over 700,000 people who have signed the group's petition to stop the Freedom of Choice Act, which Obama has said he would support and sign into law upon passage through Congress.

"Immediately after the election, our servers melted down from so many people looking to take a stand against an abortion agenda," Yoest told WND. "Subsequently, what we've found over the last several months is that every time we've asked people on that list to do something, the response has been overwhelming."



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

What Does Obama Think of Pro-Lifers?


Pro-Life Awakened to New Life


Political Revolution

Truth Seeker

Weasel Zippers

AUL Blog and Planned Parenthood, "The total government grants and contracts received by PPFA affiliates also increased from $337 million to $350 million ..."


Charmaine Quoted in Politico.
What Does Obama Think of Pro-Lifers?
What Does Obama Think of Veterans?

April 16, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

ronald_reagan_with_charmaine_smaller.jpgYour Business Blogger(R) teaches business at the local college and loves the 'continuous learning' life style. So when Jack Welch, Ph.D., former CEO of GE has something to say about management, this student takes notes.

Welch appeared on CNBC's Squawk Box this morning and graded president Obama on leadership.

Welch said Obama on leadership earned an "A."

(On leadership, said Welch; Not so on policy...)

Personnel is Policy, Ronald Reagan & Charmaine

Welch mentioned his criteria: Vision, Mission, Communication and Team Building.

Welch explained the value of having the right people on the president's team -- and how well the team works together because they each share the vision and mission of Obama's America.

This is what president Reagan talked about in "Personnel is Policy" when Charmaine worked in the West Wing. You hire people who think as you would think -- the boss should hire like minded deputies.

And this is exactly what Obama has done. Jack Welch is right. Obama's managers want us all to love and worship Obama's world (view).

So when an Obama Deputy - Napolitano -- publishes a directive to law enforcement officials -- those with the power to arrest -- that Pro-Lifers and Veterans are a danger to America; all Americans know that this is exactly how Obama thinks.

What happens next? Obama is dividing our nation. People are not buying Obama's vision for America. Texas talks about seceding (again). But this time the abolitionists Pro-Lifers will be in the south -- not Massachusetts. Salena Zito writes,

Texas Gov. Rick Perry last week declared the federal government had become "oppressive in its size, intrusion into the lives of our citizens and its interference with the affairs of our state."

Obama will push for the so called 'Freedom of Choice Act' or FOCA. Which will remove all local regulation of abortion and the offices where abortions are preformed. A social worker in a dirty back alley could do the baby-cutting.

Obama will allow open homosexuals to serve in the military which will destroy unit cohesion and effect our ability to complete any mission and will certainly cost American lives.

But red-blooded Americans are fighting back.

Charmaine was interviewed by Politico on the Obama backlash. CARRIE BUDOFF BROWN writes in Obama boosts anti-abortion efforts,

The first hint of a stir came just after Election Day, when the computer servers at Americans United for Life crashed. People were swamping the Web site to sign a petition urging President-elect Barack Obama to stand firm against abortion.

"I got a call from one of our guys, 'We have a problem,' " said Charmaine Yoest, the group's president and chief executive officer. "And I was like, 'The problem would be what?'"

Tech-savvy Charmaine knows that servers being overwhelmed with internet traffic is a high-quality problem.

Obama does not care for veterans such as Your Business Blogger(R) nor the Pro-Lifers such as Americans United for Life.
.


Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

An Alert Reader, fred5676 writes on Michele Malkin's Confirmed: The Obama DHS hit job on conservatives is real,

So NumbersUSA and Americans United for Life are terrorist groups??? COUNT ME IN!!

Visit the Baptist Bulletin world news.

See the Pregnancy Resource Center at UAB; A student organization serving pregnant and parenting students on our campus,

More than 261,000 people have signed an online petition calling on Notre Dame to withdraw its invitation for Obama to speak at the Catholic university's May 17 commencement. The petition says Obama has carried out "some of the most anti-life actions of any American president," including expanding taxpayer-funded research on embryonic stem cells.

And Americans United for Life plans to expand its plans to expand its staff in Washington and, after the post-election crash, recently upgraded its computer system to handle the bump in online activism.

The King's Good Servant and God's First

Jill Stanek has excellent analysis at Anti-life (on steroids) Obama energizes pro-life movement

See Peter Shinn from Pro-Life Unity interview Dr. Charmaine Yoest.

Fight for Life here.

AUL Defends Doctors and Nurses

Oklahoma legislature would allow pregnant mother to use deadly force to protect unborn

Love Life no matter how small.

Catholic Pro-Life Committee

CNA -- Oklahoma legislature would allow pregnant mother to use deadly force to protect unborn


Charmaine Quoted in US News & World Report;
Which Stem Cell Research is "Shovel Ready"?

March 20, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine was interviewed by Dan Gilgoff for USN&WR on the morality of embryonic stem cell research.

Charmaine used the Octo-Mom as a current events hook. (See Charmaine on Huckabee The Video.)

Dan Gilgoff writes in God & Country, Octo-Mom as a Poster Girl for Opponents of Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Do conservative Christians opposed to using excess embryos from IVF clinics for stem cell research really want to be citing the octo-mom as a poster girl for their cause? With 14 children and no husband, Nadya Suleman hardly appears to have created the healthful home life that the pro-family movement advocates...

No, Dan, the Octo-Mom is not a poster girl...

He missed the point. (Alert the Media! Main Stream Media Misses Argument!)

However, Dan Gilgoff did publish Charmaine's rebuttal, Americans United for Life President Rebuts Octo-Mom as Poster Girl Charge.

###

Jill Stanek is on point and more pointed as always. She writes, US News & World Report's ludicrous claim: Octomom is Yoest/Stanek's "poster girl"

Dan Gilgoff of US News & World Report wrote an insulting piece today, "Octo-Mom as a poster girl for opponents of embryonic stem cell research," a typical example of MSM spinning a story to fit the liberal agenda.

More from Americans United for Life on embryonic stem cell reseach in Human Events,

[T]he National Institutes of Health spent nearly $1 billion tax dollars on stem cell research in FY 2008. Adult stem cell research received more funding because it was better science and was actually helping patients -- clinical trials are very expensive. If Obama were truly looking for "shovel ready" research projects able to produce real results, embryonic stem cell research would not make the list.
...
If the justification for such research is the hope of developing successful therapies, only adult stem cells have a demonstrated track record of success.

Obama has been disingenuous in claiming that he is freeing up monies for such research for the first time. Stem cell research -- publicly and privately funded -- has been going on for more than a decade.

But what is often lost in all of the reports about stem cell research is the critical difference -- both in terms of real results and ethical controversy -- between adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells.

See the Southern Political Report.

Blogger JONATHAN TURLEY, Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks") is a smart guy... usually. But not so funny. Humor is hard work, best left to professionals like Rush Limbaugh, or anyone who is not a lawyer. Read Turley -- Look, Honey, He Has Your Ectoderm! Georgia Legislators Pass Law Allowing Adoption of Embryos, Constitutional Law , Politics , Religion , Society -- with this knee-slapper,

This week, the Georgia state House of Representatives voted 96-66 to adopt a bill allowing for people to legally adopt as parents embryos that can be implanted in in vitro fertilization procedures. The legislation is defended by Clarke Forsythe, senior counsel of Americans United for Life, as responsive to "the need to humanize the embryonic human at a time when at the federal level embryonic stem cell research is being promoted."

There has been an effort to recognize embryos as separate living beings as part of a pro-life agenda. Colorado recently moved to declare fertilized eggs as people.

It is not clear what one gets for a newly adoptive couple of a frozen embryo. Travel coolers and hot ice are possible options.

Visit Inspire, for a perspective from China.

See Georgia House Passes HB 388: Nation's First Embryo Adoption Bill.

Want a "Perfect Baby"? You're Gonna Have To Make It The Old-Fashioned Way.

Read Reflections of a Paralytic, All Life Is Sacred, Not So Fast, Art Caplan.

MEDIA ALERT: Charmaine Quoted in AP Video; Obama's Human Experimentation on Embryonic Stem Cells


MEDIA ALERT: Charmaine Quoted in CBS, CNN, Politico, LifeNews, ChristianityToday: Steele on Abortion

March 16, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine has been quoted in a number of media outlets on GOP Chairman Steele's remarks in GQ on abortion as an individual's choice.

From CBSGOP Chair Steele Again Under Fire
Posted by Brian Montopoli | Comments 61

Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele is once again in the news after suggesting in an interview with GQ that he believes abortion should be "an individual choice."
...
Charmaine Yoest of Americans United for Life Action, meanwhile, characterized the remarks as "language straight out of Planned Parenthood's messaging playbook."

CNN Steele faces more fallout over abortion comments, From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

(CNN) -- A chorus of leading conservatives continued to criticize GOP chairman Michael Steele Thursday over the Republican leader's comments on abortion in an interview with GQ magazine....Other high-profile conservatives who have expressed criticism over the comments include ... Americans United for Life and Action CEO Charmaine Yoest.


Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele Under Fire for Abortion Comments
, by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor
...[P]rominent pro-life advocates have responded to Steele's remarks.

Charmaine Yoest, the president of Americans United for Life, said she was disappointed that Steele had appeared to water down his pro-life views.

"I think it is very troubling for a public figure, of either party, particularly one who presents himself as pro-life, to describe the abortion issue as being a matter of 'individual choice,'" Yoest said, adding that Planned Parenthood normally uses that sort of language.

"There are millions of pro-life Americans, Republican and Democrat, who are looking for leadership on the life issue and they will find Mr. Steele's comments disturbing and demoralizing," she continued.



Michael Steele Takes Heat after Abortion Remarks
, Sarah Pulliam,
RNC Chairman Michael Steele is creating a big fuss after his interview with GQ where he said women have the right to choose abortion.

Are you saying you think women have the right to choose abortion? Yeah. I mean, again, I think that's an individual choice.

You do?
Yeah. Absolutely.

Charmaine Yoest, the president and CEO of Americans United for Life Action responded:

"I think it is very troubling for a public figure, of either party, particularly one who presents himself as pro-life, to describe the abortion issue as being a matter of 'individual choice,'" That is language straight out of Planned Parenthood's messaging playbook," Yoest said she hadn't heard from the RNC. "There are millions of pro-life Americans, Republican and Democrat, who are looking for leadership on the life issue and they will find Mr. Steele's comments disturbing and demoralizing."

In Politico, Steele, under fire, walks back 'choice' remark,

RNC Chairman Michael Steele said today that despite telling an interviewer he supports "individual choice" and state-level decisions on abortion, he in fact opposes abortion and supports a Constitutional ban....

Steele has also been reaching out to anti-abortion leaders to damp down the controversy, a source said.

But Steele drew fire from activists Thursday morning for his remarks.

"I think it is very troubling for a public figure, of either party, particularly one who presents himself as pro-life, to describe the abortion issue as being a matter of 'individual choice,'" That is language straight out of Planned Parenthood's messaging playbook," said Charmaine Yoest, the president and CEO of Americans United for Life Action, who said she hadn't heard from the RNC. "There are millions of pro-life Americans, Republican and Democrat, who are looking for leadership on the life issue and they will find Mr. Steele's comments disturbing and demoralizing."

Another anti-abortion activist and sharp critic of President Barack Obama on the subject, Jill Stanek, was even blunter.

"Michael Steele has just unmistakably proclaimed himself to be pro-choice," she said in an email. "You thought he was 'embattled' last week over his Limbaugh comment? Ha. He has now stepped both feet into it."



MEDIA ALERT: Charmaine On FOX: Embryonic Stem Cell Research

March 6, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine_Yoest_CSPAN_cropped.pngWhen does life begin? Obama wasn't sure, but the science is settled.

Life begins at conception.

Charmaine on an earlier appearance on C-SPAN

From an article by William L. Saunders, Jr., graduate of Harvard Law School, in the Fordham Urban Law Journal,

Lethal Experimentation on Human Beings: Roe's Effect on Bioethics,

There is no mystery about when human life begins. It is only within the political and ideological context that this matter is contested...

When the matter is not being debated in a courtroom or on the floor of the Congress, when it is left for scientific analysis, the resolution is clear.

Human life begins, in the normal, ordinary case, at "conception," that is to say, at fertilization...

See, e.g., C.R. Austin, Fertilization, in Germ Cells and Fertilization 103, 103 (C.R. Austin & Short eds., 1972).

Charmaine is scheduled to debate against Embryonic Stem Cell Research and for Adult Stem Cell Research on Fox and Friends on Sunday morning the 8th.

Note this is not the Sunday morning Fox with Chris Wallace.

Hit time estimate is 8am eastern.

Thank you (foot)notes,

See Adult Stem Cell Research: Benefits and Successes

The Politico Quotes Yoest on Embryonic Stem Cell Legislation

Charmaine Quoted in Congressional Quarterly on Stem Cell Research

West Wing propaganda on stem cell research

What's a Blastocyst, Anyway?


Americans United for Life Hires New Staff Counsel

March 4, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Jessica_J_Sage_Esq.jpg AUL has made a terrific new hire,


Jessica J. Sage joined Americans United for Life (AUL) as as staff counsel in March 2009. Her responsibilities include assisting the Vice President of Legal Affairs with all aspects of AUL's legal program including legislative drafting and consulting and the development of new life-affirming legislation related to abortion and end-of-life issues.

Jessica J. Sage, Esq

Jessica drafts amicus curiae briefs on behalf of AUL and its clients to educate federal and state courts across the nation on pro-life issues. Jessica also contributes to AUL's annual publication Defending Life: Proven Strategies for a Pro-Life America.

"We are extremely gratified that an attorney of Jessica's caliber and commitment is joining our already exceptional legal team," said Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL President & CEO.

Americans United for Life
is the country's oldest pro-life organization.


Charmaine Quoted in AP, Americans United for Life Action Opposes Sebelius

March 2, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

sebelius_dress.jpgCharmaine at AUL was interviewed by the Associated Press by phone while we were in Laguna Niguel over the weekend.

Sebelius, credit: Tony's Kansas City

JOHN HANN writes, Abortion foes vow to fight a Sebelius nomination,


TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) -- National anti-abortion groups promise a vigorous fight if President Barack Obama nominates Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius as U.S. health and human services secretary....

"It's not just that she has a pro-abortion rights viewpoint," said Charmaine Yoest, president and chief executive officer of Americans United for Life Action. "It's her very close association with one of the most infamous abortionists in this country."...

Abortion foes said Friday an important issue is a reception Sebelius once had with a late-term abortion provider who's now facing criminal charges.

Administration officials disputed the idea that abortion is an issue as to whether Obama nominates Sebelius. She is considered a leading candidate for the HHS job, although the White House has said others are being considered.

Abortion opponents acknowledged Friday that they'll probably be uncomfortable with nearly anyone Obama nominates, but they're particularly upset by the prospect of Sebelius.

A major reason is an event in April 2007 at the governor's residence with Dr. George Tiller and his Wichita clinic's staff. Abortion foes eventually obtained photos from the reception and posted them last year on the Internet.

Charmaine's reports that Sebelius opposes and has voted against Parental Notification and safe, clinical standards for abortion offices. See the Americans United for Life Action blog,


The need for this critical legislation was predicated, in large part, on evidence of shocking conditions in Kansas abortion clinics.

For example, two inspections of the same Topeka abortion clinic discovered fetal remains stored in the same refrigerator as food;

a dead rodent in the clinic hallway;

overflowing, uncovered disposal bins containing medical waste;

unlabeled, pre-drawn syringes with controlled substances in an unlocked refrigerator;

improperly labeled and expired medicines; carpeted floor in the surgical procedure room; and visible dirt and general disarray throughout the clinic.

Dr. Krishna Rajanna, who operated the unsanitary clinic, also consistently violated the practice guidelines for conscious sedation.

These unsanitary medical practices would close a restaurant, let alone an abortion office. Other issues that disqualify Sebelius,

On balance, Gov. Sebelius' record demonstrates that she is unfit to serve as HHS Secretary and should not be in a position to make such important policy determinations including:

* Whether to rescind, modify, or retain HHS rules requiring that recipients of certain federal funding certify their compliance with existing federal law supporting healthcare fights of conscience;

* Whether to expand the over-the-counter availability of abortifacients such as "Plan B" (so-called "emergency contraception") to allow minors to obtain these controversial and dangerous drugs without a prescription or doctor's involvement; and

* Whether to rescind approval for or, at a minimum, review the safety and efficacy of RU-486 ("the abortion pill") which has killed at least 7 women in the U.S. since it was approved by the FDA in September 2000.

Alert Readers know that Your Business Blogger(R) worked in a restaurant as a teenager. My boss was always worried that the Health Department Inspector might find some random rat dropping. My restaurant manager would have nothing to fear if Sebelius was the governor. Sebelius is not qualified to oversee a food service business. And she is not qualified to run Health and Human Resources.

See KansasCity.com


Pro-Choice Democrats FightFOCA

February 26, 2009 | By Jack Yoest



Join Fight FOCA
Charmaine sent this note to 300,000 of her closest friends who are Fighting FOCA, the so called 'Freedom of Choice Act,'

Thank you for recently taking action by contacting your Member of Congress and asking them to sign onto a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi defending pro-life riders.

Yesterday, the Jordan/Shuler letter was sent to Speaker Pelosi and released to the public with 180 Congressional signers -- 157 Republicans and 23 Democrats.

Thank you for contacting your Representative. Because you took action with us, a broad coalition of Members of Congress made a public stand to defend our pro-life principles.

As we've mentioned before, the attacks on pro-life riders is the first attempt by the pro-abortion movement to pass the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) "by stealth".

It is so vital we do whatever we can to defend these vital amendments to federal budget bills and keep our tax dollars from being used to pay for abortion here in the United States and on our military bases worldwide. Repealing these laws is the first target of Planned Parenthood and their allies -- and their first step toward pushing the FOCA agenda.

The full text of the letter with all of the signatures is available on the AUL Action blog (PDF).

We look forward to keeping you informed as things progress on Capitol Hill and in state legislatures across the country.

Yours for Life,

Charmaine

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
AUL Action The Legislative Arm of Americans United for Life
FightFOCA.com

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

DAVID CRARY at The (liberal) Huffinton Post writes, Anti-Abortion Groups Invigorated By Obama Win, which generated 559 comments,

"The hardline, divisive tactics they've used have been resoundingly rejected," said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. "We'll probably see some splintering within the conservative community. ...I'd hope some of the folks on the right, if their goal is to reduce the need for abortions, would link arms with us."

But for now, anti-abortion leaders are eager to appear undaunted.

"Any time you have a loss like that, you have an opportunity to reassess and come back stronger," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life. "If they want to see this as a big loss that will set us back, that's OK. Our people are very energized, and ready for Round Two."

John Cronin writes about the win in the battle on the war on FOCA in comMITTed to Romney,

As I wrote in my post from several days ago, we have won another battle in the fight to protect innocent life in the womb, but the war continues.

I post this email...to help share the conviction that grassroots activism does work. Together, we are making a difference.

See What horrors await us in the penumbras formed by emanations.

All About Americas Sweetheart - Sarah Palin
.

Visit soulpants with Advocates prepare for uphill battle to end abortion under pro-choice president.

Roundup: Condoms Trump Abstinence in Obama Global AIDS Policy.

Read Women of Faith with FOCA on the Family, Pardon the pun, but churches and families need to be aware of how the Freedom of Choice Act will impact their community, something we should expect to see enacted...

SPECIAL: Interview with AUL Action's Charmaine Yoest...

Read More Local More Personal.


Americans United for Life Quoted in
Washington Times

February 23, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Alert Readers have noted that Charmaine did not make a number of points about the Octo-mom on Huckabee.

The segment was edited down for time. But Charmaine at AUL and some media outlets are reporting about the need for regulation of fertility clinics and Artificial Reproductive Technology (ART).

Cheryl Wetzstein writes
WETZSTEIN: Fertility industry in need of rules
in the Washington Times,

Lawmakers in a hurry might want to consider model ART legislation from the pro-life Americans United for Life (AUL).

The bill recommends limiting the transfer of embryos to two at a time and encourages using frozen embryos before creating new ones, AUL official Mailee Smith said. It also would require comprehensive informed consent, so women can understand the range of health risks associated with multiple births, she said.

Charmaine was scheduled to appear on Larry King Live to continue the fertility debate, but was canceled.

###

Thank you (foot)notes,

See more of AUL's incremental abortion strategy in, MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH New trend: Ultrasounds before abortion 12 states may require doctors to offer image of baby prior to terminating life, By Chelsea Schilling, © 2009 WorldNetDaily. For example, in,

Missouri: Physicians and other "professionals" performing abortions must provide information about free ultrasound services, allow the woman access to an ultrasound and provide her with a chance to listen to the heartbeat of her unborn baby.

Currently, a patient must be informed of risks of abortions 24 hours before terminating her pregnancy. Doctors must have written parental consent or a court order to perform abortions on minors.

According to Americans United for Life, the state's General Assembly "has found that the life of each human being begins at conception." The state prohibits partial-birth abortion throughout pregnancy.

Most fertility clinics break the rules.


Charmaine on Huckabee The Video

February 18, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine appeared on Mike Huckabee's Huckabee cable show on FOX this past Saturday and Sunday.

She debated the Octo-mom issue.

Please let us know what you think.

###

Thank you (foot)notes,

See Americans United for Life.

Visit Pro-Life Choices Network letter on FOCA.

Congressman John P. Murtha (D-PA) to Oppose FOCA on Vivficat.

Renewing My Faith, Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He shall direct your paths. Proverbs 3:5-6 writes,

I was really disappointed that Charmaine was not able to touch more on the important topics such as:

1. These Dr. are operating as self-regulated with no laws preventing them from what they are doing. The need to have public policy stating what is ethical for Dr. to perform.
2. Are these Dr. doing harm to the patient by implanting 8 embryos?...

Brook B asks good questions. Her interview was taped and was much, much longer but was edited down for the show. Many of the issues were covered in the original debate.

Your Business Blogger(R) is confident that the debate that Brook is looking for will be seen on Larry King Live tomorrow, Thursday, Feb 19, 2009 on CNN. Charmaine is schedule to appear and will continue the conversation.



Pro-Life State Rankings by
Americans United for Life

February 9, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Americans United for Life has released a state-by-state review of local abortion laws. The ranking is based on a numerical evaluation-criteria. See State by State Legal Guide to Abortion, Bioethics and the End of Life.

The Best States

1. Pennsylvania
2. Louisiana
3. South Dakota
4. Oklahoma
5. Mississippi
6. Texas
7. North Dakota
8. Nebraska
9. Arkansas
10. Indiana

The Worst States

50. California
49. Hawaii
48. Vermont
47. New Jersey
46. Connecticut
45. Nevada
44. Oregon
43. New York
42. Washington
41. Illinois

And please sign the FightFOCA petition!



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

The KansasJackass loves abortion and Planned Parenthood.

Also see LifeNews reports, Missouri Bill Introduced for Ultrasound, Better Informed Consent Before Abortion

See 12 States Weigh Ultrasound Abortion Bills, by Christianity Today.

Is The State You Live In For Or Against Life?

See Craig's Cogitations.

Is your state for or against life?

Read the outstanding writing by Meredith Turney at California Ranks DEAD Last.

SwampFox discusses FOCA

Jeremy Alford blogs How pro-life is Louisiana?

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, AUL president, says the ranking offers every reason for optimism for conservatives in Louisiana, especially with the election of Democratic President Barack Obama, who is pro-choice. "Since the election, we have seen a huge outpouring of grassroots support for our work opposing the radically pro-abortion Freedom of Choice Act as well as hundreds of inquiries about life-affirming legislation," Youest says.

Life as it Happens has more on Obama and FOCA.

Kyrie Eleison gives a link.

The Spin Cipher has Freedom of Choice for who?

Cellar dweller has California at bottom of list in pro-life group's ranking of states.


Stop the Abortion Business Bailout;
Planned Parenthood vs Americans United for Life

January 27, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

cecile_richards_obama.jpgYour Business Blogger(R) teaches marketing at the local college and collects fund raising letters to study sales tactics.

Cecile Richards and Obama

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood sent me her January direct mail piece. Long copy, hair-on-fire prose, multiple choice graduated dollar 'ask', closing with a final "Please act as quickly as possibly" PS appeal.

A very good letter. About what this professor/student would expect from a billion dollar enterprise. The best your tax dollars could buy.*

In the body of the letter Cecile Richards demonized her pro-life opposition.

That would be Americans United for Life.

Alert Readers know that the legal eagles at AUL have been working for decades crafting model legislation to protect women and their babies. AUL works with state and local lawmakers to build in safeguards for women and their children considering abortions.

This state-by-state incremental approach has wide, deep and popular support. These incremental laws are changing the culture and attitudes. Everyone -- including pro-choice supporters -- wants to know if their minor girls are seeking an abortion.

No one wants an abortion performed by a social worker instead of a skilled physician.

This incremental tactic is working for AUL and against Planned Parenthood.

Cecile Richards writes,

[W]e must push back against [those] who are working state by state to win legislation...We must prevent states from passing laws...that's not how this country works.

Yes, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, this is exactly how our country works best. The People have demanded that locally elected lawmakers work to protect Life.

Just as laws had to be changed to eliminate slavery-- Laws are being changed today to eliminate abortion on demand.

Even as Planned Parenthood needs abortion to generate revenue.

AUL is helping to reduce abortion and to reduce Planned Parenthood's abortion bucks.

Cecile Richard's fund raising letter is attempting to maintain the revenue streams from each of it's 880 abortion offices.

***

Charmaine has sent the following email to some 250,000 of her closest friends.

FightFOCA-Email-Header-500.png

In this letter: A report on the March for Life . . . the petition count has crossed 500,000 signatures! . . . an update on FOCA and what to expect next -- "FOCA-by-Stealth."

Dear AUL Supporter,

Surrounded by over 300,000 fellow pro-lifers -- many of you! -- on Thursday AUL Action staff and our families marched up Constitution Avenue here in Washington DC, from the base of Capitol Hill to the steps of the Supreme Court. There were so many thousands of people thronging the streets that at times we couldn't move. My eight-year-old daughter, Sarah, marched next to me, and I explained to her that we were headed to the Supreme Court so that the judges would know we believe abortion is wrong.

dancer_march_for_life_2009_foca.png

"Mommy," she asked, "how many people will it take to overturn Roe v. Wade?"

How many people indeed. My thoughts immediately went to you -- the hundreds of thousands of you who have signed the FightFOCA petition -- who have taken a public stand to say: our voices will not be silenced.

The day before the March for Life the petition count reached HALF A MILLION signatures!

As I write today, the number has jumped to over 585,000. That's partly because many people saw FightFOCA signs at the March.

march_for_life_2009_crowd_yoest.png
But it's also because so many of you responded to our call to spread the word to your churches on Sanctity of Life Sunday -- the flyers were downloaded over 20,000 times! Thank you!

The success of this petition is because of YOU. The message has spread through email and through blogs and through Facebook and through word-of-mouth. Your efforts.

In fact, we have been so successful that now Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood, and others are saying that they aren't going to try to pass the Freedom of Choice Act, (FOCA).

Don't believe it for a second.

If your opponent gives up the frontal attack . . . you better start watching your flank.

We are now seeing the abortion forces waging an incremental battle -- working to pass what we have termed "FOCA-by-Stealth."
They think that if they take FOCA and repackage it and pass it in pieces and under different names . . . that we won't notice.

But with apologies to Shakespeare, FOCA by any other name, smells just as bad. And as they pass the Stealth FOCA's, more babies will be killed and more women victimized by the abortion-on-demand regime.

Case in point: I'm sure you've heard that the day after the March, President Obama used an executive order to overturn the long-standing ban on funding organizations that promote and perform abortions overseas. The media portrayed him as sensitive to pro-lifers because he waited till after the March -- in fact, he released the order at 5:00 on Friday -- a textbook stealth move to keep the story under the media radar.

And now they've added subsidies for the abortion industry into the economic stimulus package. No surprise: Cecile Richards used to be the Deputy Chief of Staff to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. So it's no wonder we saw Pelosi on the Sunday shows arguing that more tax dollars for Planned Parenthood -- and fewer children -- helps the economy. Incredible.

Friends, this is just the beginning. We have a lot of work in front of us.
Please keep encouraging your friends to sign the FightFOCA petition.

We will be using those signatures on Capitol Hill in the days ahead to argue against FOCA and ANY and EVERY piece of legislation that promotes abortion.

baby_boo_march_for_life_2009_nap.png
The FightFOCA petition says to Planned Parenthood and their Congressional allies: we will not be silenced.

The week before the March, my husband, Jack and I had the honor of attending the funeral of the pro-life hero, Father Richard John Neuhaus.

We were all reminded that in one of his last speeches, Father Neuhaus encouraged the pro-life movement by saying, "Do not grow weary."

How many people will it take to overturn Roe? It takes you.

Thanks for your work and being a part of this movement.

Yours for Life,

Charmaine

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
AUL Action The Legislative Arm of Americans United for Life
FightFOCA.com
FightFOCA@FightFOCA.com

P.S. -- PS: More pictures from the March are posted on my Facebook page . . .

###

*Planned Parenthood receives over 300 million of your tax dollars each year.

CBN reports, Abortion Policy Sets 'Disappointing Tone'

Visit Fight FOCA - Barack Obama's plan to eliminate restriction on abortion nationwide

The Spin Cipher has more on FOCA.

See Abortion News Today

Read The Catholic Review

Kara from Texas gets it right -- see My 3 Son's

Catholic Dad ask a question

Is Anybody There? wonders about Obama.

Jeff Leach has reactions from both sides.

See Traditional Catholic Reflections


Charmaine on the Obama Abortion Business Bail Out;
Reuters, Wall Street Journal, Washington Times

January 24, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

baby_boo_march_for_life_2009.jpg Charmaine was busy with media interviews while she marched in the March for Life.

(This was quite an act: no child was left behind...) Obama is beginning to fulfill his campaign promises to bail out the abortion business.

Baby Boo working the crowd at the March for Life

If you support abortion or not, you are now going to pay for abortion...the world over.

Your Business Blogger
(R) does not care for the government bail out of any business. Especially not the abortion business.

Obama lifts restrictions on abortion funding, 24 Jan 2009, Source: Reuters

By Jeff Mason and Deborah Charles (Additional reporting by Ed Stoddard)

WASHINGTON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Friday lifted restrictions on U.S. government funding for groups that provide abortion services or counseling abroad, reversing a policy of his Republican predecessor George W. Bush...

"When we wake up every morning to a deepening financial crisis, it is an insult to the American people to bail out the abortion industry," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.

"Planned Parenthood is a billion-dollar company and they do not need additional resources to burden the American taxpayer."...

The United States spends more than $400 million on overseas family planning assistance each year.

Jon Ward writes in The Washington Times, Obama changes policy on abortion, Saturday, January 24, 2009

"What a terrible way to begin a new administration: with an abortion business bailout that will exploit women in developing countries for political ends," said Charmaine Yoest, President of Americans United for Life Action.
...
Mr. Obama's promise to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would repeal all state and local restrictions on abortion, such as parental notification laws and measures allowing physicians to deny abortions based on their own faith convictions, came under fire Thursday from congressional Republicans.

charmaine_lila_rose_march_for_life_2009.jpg

LAURA MECKLER reports in The Wall Street Journal, Obama Intends to Lift Family-Planning 'Gag Rule'; Move Would Restore Funds to International Groups Involved With Abortion; Timing Shows Sensitivity to Foes of Roe v. Wade,

Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, thinks the change in policy amounts to U.S. tax dollars funding abortion and sees no positive outcome.

LifeNews.com Editor, Steven Ertelt, reports
Pro-Life Advocates: Obama Has Already Betrayed Promise to Reduce Abortions
January 23, 2009,

Charmaine Yoest, [Ph.D.] the president of Americans United for Life, also responded to the news.

"What a terrible way to begin a new administration: with an abortion business bailout that will exploit women in developing countries for political ends," she told LifeNews.com.


"We should not export the tragedy of abortion to other nations, and we certainly shouldn't do so via the hard-earned dollars of American taxpayers," she said.

Denise Burke, [Americans United for Life] Vice President of Legal Affairs said the move also creates foreign policy headaches because it has the U.S. funding pro-abortion groups that are actively lobbying other nations to reverse their long-standing pro-life laws.

"Pro-abortion organizations like the International Planned Parenthood Federation are actively working to impose radically pro-abortion laws on developing nations, showing no regard for the will of the people in these countries," she said. "This move is a significant step backwards in respecting the sovereignty of nations, in empowering women, and in protecting unborn."

###

Thank you (foot)notes,

Notae Zuinglii, Bible and Theology writes, Legitimizing Murder
Yes we can, use your money to fund abortions
"The time has come to set aside childish things." Barak H. Obama 1/20/09

See Mike's Noise, We Surrender! "Bailout" plan is now law

Visit Tradition Catholic Reflections

President Bush writes,

In 2002, I was honored to sign into law the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which extends legal protection to children who survive an abortion attempt.
Born Alive protection is opposed by Obama.

Republican Leader John Boehner is blogging. Read his post at Americans United for Life Action, Mr. President: Reconsider FOCA

January 22, 2009

A Guest Post by Republican Leader John Boehner

Yesterday, on the eve of the 36th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe v Wade decision, 105 Members of Congress sent a letter to President Obama requesting that he reconsider his support for overturning pro-life laws--even laws enacted by the States. Specifically we asked the President to withdraw his pledge to sign the so-named Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would in one tragic act overturn virtually all pro-life laws nationwide, and to refuse to support policies that incrementally enact the FOCA agenda by rescinding or weakening existing pro-life laws....


Charmaine Quoted in The Wall Street Journal;
Planned Parenthood Forbids the Science of the Sonogram

January 23, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

cecile_richards_obama.jpgWhile we were marching in yesterday's March for Life, Charmaine was interviewed by the WSJ on the Obama Abortion Bail Out executive order.

Cecile Richards, from Planned Parenthood and Obama

The reporter, LAURA MECKLER, asked about the current Mexico City Accord which prohibits USA taxpayers funding education on "reproductive freedom" to other countries. (The Alert Reader knows well that reproductive freedom/education is code for abortion.) The reporter also asked about Obama's "sensitivity" on not signing the abortion bailout on the anniversary of Roe v Wade; 22 January -- a day Pro-Lifers yearly recognize as the day the Supreme Court legalized abortion in all 57 50 states. Abortion is now legal through all nine months of pregnancy.

Meckler wrote,

...[A]bortion opponents were not mollified. Charmaine Yoest, [Ph.D.] president of Americans United for Life, thinks the change in policy amounts to U.S. tax dollars funding abortion and sees no positive outcome. But she called the delayed timing "a politically savvy move" by the White House.

Meckler also interviewed Cecile Richards,

Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which offers abortion and family planning, says she doesn't care when President Obama changes the policy, as long as it is changed. "He has clearly stated his opposition to the global gag rule and his intention to overturn it," she said.

Cecile Richards makes money selling and preforming abortions. If women and other countries cannot afford an abortion. The American tax payer will now pay for them in a Planned Parenthood office.

sonogram_side_by_side.jpg

There is one gag rule that Cecile Richards demands that Obama not change: No pregnant woman should see a sonogram of her baby.

85 percent of women who see the first picture of the child, do not have an abortion.

Planned Parenthood cannot have the science of the sonogram help women to choose.

***

Over 530,000 have signed the Americans United for Life petition to Fight FOCA. Be sure to sign up!

Your Business Blogger
(R) and Charmaine spend time yesterday talking with Lila Rose who regularly captures on video Planned Parenthood covering up rapes. See
Planned Parenthood Rape Cover-up: Is a Sting Operation Ethical?



Abortion Bailout; The March For Life;
Blogs 4 Life

January 22, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

March_for_life_yoest_dan_mcconchie_2009.pngYour Business Blogger(R), Charmaine and the Penta-Posse joined some 300,000 of our closest friends and marched for life "celebrated" each January 22nd. Charmaine worked the event with her team from Americans United for Life.

It took over three hours for the March to pass.

Obama was invited.

He didn't show.

The Yoests and Dan McConchie supporting AUL's FightFOCA
at the March for Life 2009

But Obama did offer to make nice: He won't sign an abortion bailout executive order...until tomorrow, Friday.

Tomorrow, the 23rd, he is expected to issue by presidential fiat an order which will permit your tax dollars to pay for abortions around the world.

We all may differ on when life begins. Or if a baby is being aborted. Or if there is a link between breast cancer and abortion.

But most of the country does not want our tax dollars to pay for abortions. Especially overseas.

No one wants a bail out for the off shore affiliates of Planned Parenthood.

***



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:
See the post from PoliPundit, LIVE From Blogs 4 Life

Visit Blogs 4 Life.

Professor Robert George of Princeton writes,

Obama is being served and abetted by a small number of Catholic and Evangelical intellectuals and activists who have been peddling the claim that Obama, despite his pro-abortion extremism, is effectively pro-life because of his allegedly enlightened economic and social policies will reduce the number of abortions. This is delusional.

The truth is that Barack Obama is the most extreme pro-abortion candidate ever to serve in the United States Senate or seek the Office of President of the United States.

The revocation of the Hyde Amendment, the Mexico City Policy, funding limitations on embryo-destructive research, informed consent laws, parental notification statutes--all of which Obama has promised to his pro-abortion base--will dramatically increase the number of abortions, and will do so for reasons that have been articulated by the abortion lobby itself.

It is the pro-abortion side that tells us that the Hyde Amendment alone has resulted in 300,000 fewer abortions each year than would otherwise be performed--and that is why they so desperately want it to be repealed. Yet the putatively pro-life Obama apologists claim that the man who pledges to repeal it is going to reduce the number of abortions. Let me say it again: this is delusional.

Why Obama Really Voted For Infanticide from National Review


Is Abortion a Right? The Inauguration of Obama

January 20, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

People are divided. The country is divided.

However one feels, Obama has promised to make this division worse. He has promised to sign the Freedom of Choice Act or FOCA.

The Coweta-FayetteRTL blog reminds us that FOCA would,

* Provide for taxpayer-funded abortion on demand at all 9 months of pregnancy

* Grant abortionists protections from legal action

* Allow abortionists to perform abortion on minors without parental notification

* Deny health care workers the right to refuse to make abortion referrals as a matter of conscience

* Take away legal protection from religiously-affiliated hospitals who refuse to allow abortions within their facilities

* Overturn laws requiring abortions to be performed by a licensed physician

In April 2007 the Senate considered FOCA. Read the bill foca_2007_senate.pdf.

The Supreme Court has allowed abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. Obama goes further (and later) and supports post-birth abortion. A civilized people will not stand for the destruction of its most defenseless citizens. Obama is in for a fight.



Join Fight FOCA

***
Obama's Inauguration

December before last Your Business Blogger(R) followed Charmaine as she worked on the Huckabee presidential campaign. I drove the Penta-Posse in the monster Huck-a-truck and we lived out (lots!) of suitcases across Arkansas, Iowa, New Hampshire.

All of the campaigners, liberal and conservative, stayed in the same hotels. We often crossed paths and chatted in the elevators.

Sometimes we'd compliment the Obama team. "He's a very attractive candidate," I remember saying to an Obama worker at one time...

Anybody was better than Hillary.

Now we have both of them.

So what do we do now with the coming socialists? Waiting for the party of death?

Sign FightFOCA, to start.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Be sure to see Charmaine speak at Blogs 4 Life this Thursday, the 22nd in Your Nation's Capital.

Random Thoughts has graphics of partial birth abortion, which would be permitted under Obama's Freedom of Choice Act.

Thank you to NRL for the FOCA legislative link.

Please sign the petition. Almost 470,000 have signed to date.

Pro-Life and Pro-Obama?

See the Americans United for Life blog.

See Major Scoop on FOCA.

Read Father Jim,

As Catholics, we must oppose passage of the evil "Freedom of Choice Act." To read more about our U.S. Bishops' opposition to FOCA, visit www.usccb.org/prolife/issues/FOCA. Americans United For Life is also encouraging pro-lifers to sign a petition against FOCA at www.fightfoca.com. Also certain to arise soon is the issue of federal judgeship nominations. President Obama's picks for these key positions are all expected to be pro-choice, as are his choices for the Supreme Court. Committed pro-life Catholics have ample opportunity to pray for our nation, the very anti-life direction we are going towards now and our new President. God help America!

Abortion and FOCA is uniting all different religious traditions. See Making My Own Colors.

Be sure to bookmark Jill Stanek. We will need her insight over the next 4 years.

Obama: Abortion & The Death of a Live Birth, "Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like."

Watch the videos on Lisa's blog. And thank her for installing the FightFOCA code on her template.

ComMITTed to Romney has Sign FightFOCA.com's Petition to Protect Human Life!

A former submariner is Fighting FOCA.

A and A
have got the code.

Barbara takes on "Choice."

Abortions are decreasing.

And no, Abortion is not a right.

Tom McMahon asks about The Change.

2nd Cup of Coffee has Just One Wish.


Who Declared Jan 22nd as
National Sanctity of Human Life Day?

January 16, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

Question: Who Declared Jan 22nd as National Sanctity of Human Life Day?

Answer: Ronald Reagan.

January 22nd is commemorated each year as National Sanctity of Human Life Day; the anniversary of the Supreme Court decision of Roe vs Wade.

Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, January 22, 1984, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day.

I call upon the citizens of this blessed land to gather on that day in homes and places of worship to give thanks for the gift of life, and to reaffirm our commitment to the dignity of every human being and the sanctity of each human life.

No wonder liberals hate Ronald Reagan.

***



Join Fight FOCA
Charmaine was interviewed for Moody Bible Radio on the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), Sanctity of Life Sunday and The March for Life.

Visit Paul Butler's blog for the audio link. Good stuff.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Paul Butler at Paul Butler's Production Blog points us to Ronald Reagan's proclamation of January 22nd.

Reagan issued the Proclamation on January 13, 1984,

"The values and freedoms we cherish as Americans rest on our fundamental commitment to the sanctity of human life.

The first of the "unalienable rights'' affirmed by our Declaration of Independence is the right to life itself, a right the Declaration states has been endowed by our Creator on all human beings -- whether young or old, weak or strong, healthy or handicapped."

Conservatives are now the protectors of the "little guy."

The text of Reagan's proclamation at the jump.


Continue Reading »

Charmaine to Speak at Blogs for Life;
Chuck Norris will Fight FOCA
Fight FOCA on Sanctity of Life Sunday

January 15, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

charmaine_obamacon_me_yoest.pngSanctity of Life Sunday is being celebrated on the 18th -- before the March for Life on Thursday, January 22nd.

In between these two dates, the most pro-abortion president in history, Barack Obama, will be sworn in on Tuesday the 20th.

What a week.

Alert Reader Gary K sends us Charmaine's ObamaCon.me


Americans United for Life has a church bulletin insert available to alert voters on the Obama abortion agenda. See the full page insert here. Read Charmaine's letter at the jump.

The Family Research Council writes,

"Blogs for Life is scheduled to take place the day of the 36th annual March for Life, during which hundreds of thousands of pro-life advocates gather in the nation's capitol to celebrate life and demand the reversal of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

The conference will feature several prominent conservative voices including Senator Sam Brownback, Amanda Carpenter, Jill Stanek, Michael New, Ph.D., Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D., Michael Illions, Chris Gacek, J.D. and Martha Shuping, M.D. all speaking with bloggers live from Family Research Council headquarters."


***



Join Fight FOCA
To date almost 425,000 people have signed the FightFOCA petition.

It just might get Obama's attention.

Because it is the right thing to do.

How can Your Business Blogger(R) be so sure?

Because Chuck Norris approves of FightFOCA.

Chuck Norris writes at Human Events,

"Please, before FOCA flies onto the congressional floor in the upcoming days, sign the online petition to fight FOCA (www.fightfoca.com), and then contact your representatives and senators to tell them how you expect them to vote on the bill."

Chuck Norris is always right. He's smart. As The Dude says, 'Chuck Norris can divide by zero.'

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

The Dude worked backstage with Chuck Norris on the Huckabee presidential campaign trail in December 2007.

Pro-Choice abortion-approver Christina doesn't care much for the Fight against FOCA. She used to work for Planned Parenthood and says there is no such procedure as a partial birth abortion. I don't think she's seen the pictures...warning: graphic dead baby unwanted human tissue.

The Secular Heretic telling the news as it really is, has the FightFOCA code in his template. A good-guy.

UPDATE: Blogs 4 Life is on the Right Wing Watch list from People for the American Way. The anti-American PfAW has more time for abortion, now that Obama will soon be surrendering in Iraq and to Iran.


Continue Reading »

Will Pro-Lifers Quit? Father Neuhaus Eulogized;
Charmaine Quoted in Christianity Today

January 13, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

obama_new_yorker_cover.jpgThe church was full to overflowing. Even visiting priests had to stand in the aisle.

I'm sure this exceeded the Fire Marshal's Max Occupancy. But no NYFDer was going to stop this Mass demonstration.

Father Richard John Neuhaus was buried today. We were reminded of his final writings on abortion. That we would never tire nor grow weary in defending Life.

Your Business Blogger(R) and Charmaine talked about the funeral on the train back to DC. Pleased and humbled and encouraged by what Father Richard accomplished.

We were resolved to do two things to help carry on his work:

1) Continue to fight the good fight for the sanctity of Life. And,

2) Have more dinner parties.

We will pass on the cigars.

***

The abortion debate will have some challenges during the Obama administration.

Sarah Pulliam writes in Christianity Today, Battle Fatigue
Abortion opponents head into Obama presidency after big losses

"The first thing I'd do as President," Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood in 2007, "is sign the Freedom of Choice Act." The bill would remove almost all state and federal restrictions on abortion. But observers wonder if the anti-abortion movement has enough life in it to successfully fight the legislation or similar measures...

Signs of fatigue aside, observers agree that abortion will remain a major political issue.

"People are still energized and ready to fight a radical agenda on abortion as it comes down the pipe," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.

[She should have said 'pike' not 'pipe.' She has a delightful way of mixing the metaphor: Belly up to the plate; Step up to the bar, Easy as cake, It's a piece of pie. She is a fun woman to live with...]

Polls and other research suggest that younger evangelicals are more supportive of abortion restrictions than older evangelicals are. A 2007 study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life showed that 70 percent of younger white evangelicals favor "making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion," compared with 55 percent of older white evangelicals.

The Pro-Life Movement as the Politics of the 1960s by Richard John Neuhaus

Copyright (c) 2009 First Things (January 2009).


Whatever else it is, the pro-life movement of the last thirty-plus years is one of the most massive and sustained expressions of citizen participation in the history of the United States. Since the 1960s, citizen participation and the remoralizing of politics have been central goals of the left. Is it not odd, then, that the pro-life movement is viewed as a right-wing cause?...

These are the issues addressed in a remarkable new book out this month from Princeton University Press, The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right, by Jon Shields, a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College...

The pro-life movement is a movement for change, indeed for what some view as the radical change of eliminating the unlimited abortion license. "Meanwhile," writes Shields, "the pro-choice movement is a conservative movement defending the status quo. Pro-choicers have little to gain from engaging their opponents and from the deliberative norms that facilitate persuasion."

...the abortion battle is over abortion and whether the unborn child counts as a human person, but where one comes out on that question is, I believe, powerfully influenced by a host of other beliefs and attitudes aptly summarized in the pro-life language of a culture of death versus a culture of life. There are two cultures, one focused on rights and laws and the other on rights and wrongs; one focused on maximizing individual self-expression and the other on reinforcing community and responsibility....

"One of the great political ironies of the past few decades," writes Shields, "is that the Christian Right has been much more successful than its political rivals at fulfilling New Left hopes for American democracy. Far more than any movement since the early campaign for civil rights, the Christian Right has helped revive participatory democracy in America by overcoming citizens' alienation from politics." As one has all too many occasions to observe, history has many ironies in the fire. To the 1960s proponents of participatory democracy, the maxim applies: Be careful what you hope for. To those flirting with despair in the face of an Obama presidency, the advice is offered: You might want to get a copy of The Democratic Virtues of the Christian Right by Jon Shields. And all of us would do well to ponder the wisdom in the observation that there are no permanently lost causes because there are no permanently won causes.




Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

We had dinner last night at the Algonquin Hotel, birthplace of the New Yorker. Where writers and what-not would gather at the The Roundtable in the 1920's and 30's. We sat at The Roundtable and learned about the literary giants who walked those floors and sat at these places. We stared at the large wooden table and marveled and mumbled something about history to the waiter.

"The Table? Nevermind. It's a replica. Dunno where the real one is," he said. "New owners did something with it..."

The table was a fake. Made us think about all those authentic pro-choicers at the New Yorker.

Read more from First Things at the jump.

Vital Signs also recommends First Things.

Also see Wake for Father Richard John Neuhaus.


Continue Reading »

Wake for Father Richard John Neuhaus

January 12, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

dreamer_in_fur_94_Christmas.pngThe train was delayed and we all moaned and complained. Until we learned the train ahead of us killed a man.

Life can come at you fast.

The fur's in the center, The Dreamer, center right, in her first fur coat.

***

Your Business Blogger(R) rushed from his Business Class to Union Station to join Charmaine, the Princess Bride and we Amtraked business class to New York City to celebrate the life of Father Neuhaus.

Jody Bottum, a scribe at First Things spoke from the pulpit about the pro-life activism of Father Neuhaus. "We will someday overturn Roe v Wade..." generating an enthusiastic response in the Immaculate Conception Catholic Church on 14th Street. (About the only clapping we've ever heard inside a House of God -- outside a Pentecostal Church.)

Jody said to us later that abortion was an easy applause line in the Catholic Church.

Just like opposlng slavery used to be.

***

The church was standing-room-only on a frigid 26 degree night. (Global warming, it seems, has skipped a season.)

Alert Readers know that I have permission from Charmaine to approach strange women and compliment them. If they are a wearing fur coat.

A woman in fur.

In the church during the Neuhaus Wake a number of gorgeous women -- beauty is as beauty does -- were wearing fur coats, this being January with sub-freezing, non-global warming weather.

I complimented the women on their wearing fur coats. "Thank you," they each would say. "And it's warm." Practical New Yorkers. Catholics in fur.

(The Catholic Church is the largest provider of healthcare in NYC to people...with Aids. And liberals call Catholics bigots. Because Catholics wear fur, I guess.)

No PETA people threw blood on the women in fur. Didn't have to.

The women were already washed in The Blood.


FightFOCA: What Would Karl Rove Do?

January 7, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

rove_karl_yoest_election_2008.pngJust before the election, Charmaine and Your Business Blogger(R) attended an intimate off-the-record lunch with Karl Rove.

Karl Rove, Charmaine and Your Business Blogger(R)

Rove talked about election strategy and the Obama wish list.

Obama promised Planned Parenthood that the 'Freedom of Choice Act' or FOCA would be the first item of legislation he would sign.

Karl Rove has some experience against the Planned Parenthood machine -- the billion dollar enterprise that will push for FOCA; for the removal of any regulation of abortion on demand: Partial birth, parental notification, clinical standards, physician standards. It is possible to win against Planned Parenthood.

Rove has beaten a Richards before.

Rove was the, well, architect of the Bush victory over Ann Richards for Texas governor. The late Ann Richards is the mother of Cecile Richards, the present president of Planned Parenthood. Richards the younger has been trained in the workings political machinery.

To beat the current wily Richards (let's not call her "Tricky Dick"), Rove might suggest tactics he's done before to win. This time to FightFOCA; simple as 1-2-3,

1. Unify
2. Target
3. Turnout

1. Knowledge is good; and a winner. Conservative Pro-Lifers will be able to unify and bring together even Pro-Choicers who are concerned about knowing if their daughters are going to have an abortion. Pro-Abortionists would approve of the abortion. But all parents want to know if their children are playing with edged weapons and more so if they go under the knife. FightFOCA brings together Pro-Choice and Pro-Life voters. Obama would indeed be a 'uniter.'

2. Rove would suggest targeting this constituency who would have a passionate position on knowing if their children are going to have surgery by strangers. And who would be paying for the abortion. No parent would allow a stranger to give candy to their children; parents would not allow a stranger to operate on their child. Rove would identify this group, persuade them and then prompt them to action. The best sales process involves acknowledging pain -- avoiding the pain and providing a solution to solve the problem. The fear that mom and dad will lose control over the health decisions of their child is worrisome enough without Uncle Sam stepping in.

3. During an election the Rove strategy was to get a segment to the polls -- he knew he didn't need all the voters, only 50 percent + one to win a state. The action to FightFOCA is to bring the voters to movement -- so that Obama would have to delay the FOCA coming from Reid and Pelosi. This will be a challenge: Cecile Richards served as Pelosi's deputy chief-of-staff a few years ago. The tactic would be to make FOCA a costly, bloody fight of Obama against parents. Win or lose, Obama would be severely weakened in approval polls. And 'Pro-Life' Senator Reid, a Mormon, is not doing so well in his re-election polling from his home state of Nevada. His approval is 38 percent; negatives at 54.

Alert Readers know that it is nearly impossible for a candidate to win an election with negatives above 40 percent. Reid is in trouble.

Reducing abortion now polls very well for Lifers. Parental involvement polls at 70 percent approval. No liberal, finger-in-the-wind president fights this trend in the polling numbers.

At least not in his first term. Obama will delay if there is any chance that key voting groups of groups would vote against him in 2012 -- from Pro-Choice parents to Pro-Life activists; from liberal Catholics to conservative Evangelicals.

Not all agree. Alert Reader SoMG sends this counter-analysis on FOCA

Obama has everything to gain by passing FOCA. It will establish him as someone who means what he says. His friends will rejoice in his smile and his enemies will tremble at his frown.
It is not certain that Obama wishes to create any enemies -- at least not until after the '12 election. Conservatives have a number of concerns -- but we are not 'trembling.'
The payoff will swamp the investment in political capital. Any honest right-winger from Machiavelli to Pat Buchanan to Carl Rove would say the same. What does he have to lose? Right-to-Lifers in general and the Catholic Church Hierarchy in particular declared war against him more than a year ago and their prosecution of their war has been limited only by fear of losing tax-exempt status and after the election by not knowing how vengeful he might turn out to be. He has nothing to lose.
If Obama cannot keep the Catholic vote, he will lose in 2012. The conservative Pro-life Catholic constituency running the Catholic hospital system will shut down rather than perform or refer for abortions.

As much as Obama wants chaos so that he can attempt to consolidate power in a single payer national health care system, he cannot lose the health care capacity in the near term of the closing of the Catholic hospitals. One hospital in 8 is controlled by the Catholic Church. And close they will if FOCA passes.

SoMG continues,

I count a filibuster-proof pro-FOCA majority in the Senate. Fifty-seven Dems, plus two Independents, minus RTL Dem Casey, plus three pro-choice Republicans makes sixty-one and that's assuming the scheisskopf beats the clown in Minnesota which doesn't look so likely given that if the recount's too close the US Senate decides...

My prediction about FOCA: with great pomp and circumstance (to coin a phrase) the Congress will amend FOCA to specify that it doesn't mean Catholic hospitals have to refer for abortions in order to get paid by the government.

That's the most likely interpretation anyway--the Act forbids governments, not the providers paid by the governments, from discriminating against (or for) abortion.

If your client gets an equal choice between a Catholic hospital that doesn't do abortions, and an abortion clinic that doesn't do live births, you're not discriminating, right? But they'll write it in explicitly.

Then the GOP will take credit for saving the Catholics from abortion, the Dems will take credit for being reasonable in victory (much more so than the Republicans were), women in the armed forces will be able to get abortions without going off site which it's very stupid for them to have to do.

Everybody will win. Right-to-lifers will rejoice in new Federal protection for the right to refuse abortion and grow your pregnancy, which will be increasingly important as we continue our ongoing transfer to government health care and government acquires a greater interest in aborting problem pregnancies.

Conservatives and the Catholic Church have picked FOCA as the hill to live or die on -- if FOCA passes with religious exceptions, conservatives know that this would be a liberal incremental step to first minimize, then marginalize and finally eliminate the church in the public square.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Read the commentary at Eternity Matters with post, Fight the Freedom of Choice Act by Neil.

Visit DeaconJohn about FOCA.

Obama and how he will FOCA women and children. Obama's Abortion Bombshell:
Unrestricted Abortion Over Wishes of Individual States a Priority for Presidency.

See Online Prayer Requests by our friend Horace Cooper.

Social conservatives have long road ahead,
by Ed Stoddard at Reuters.

Fight FOCA at Spreading Joy.

Visit rosettasister.

Visit Fight FOCA at Streams From The Rock. This writer is worth knowing.

See Austin's Everyone Should Know.

Get Informed at The Old House Spill.

Can Obama keep up with all his promises? asks dmweblife.

Visit AbortionAbout.com, and thank them for posting the FighFOCA code, Against the Holocaust of Our Unborn Children


Race For RNC Chairman;
Charmaine in USNews & World Report

January 5, 2009 | By Jack Yoest

charmaine_baby_boo_yoest_rnc_gop_chairman_debate_jan_2008.jpgThe other day Bill O'Reilly, on the FOX No Spin Zone, asked a guest,

Who's the Chairman of the Republican National Committee?

He was wondering about the leadership of the GOP.

It was not a rhetorical question.

Baby Boo & Charmaine at the RNC debate

His guest didn't know.

O'Reilly didn't know.

O'Reilly answered his own question with his not-knowing.

The GOP has some leadership challenges.

And changes might be a-coming.

***

Join Fight FOCA

Charmaine and Your Business Blogger(R) and Baby Boo wanted to know about the future of the conservative movement and the future of the GOP.

So we headed over to the Press Club in Your Nation's Capital to hear each of the candidates interview for the RNC Chairman job. Hosted by Grover Norquist at Americans for Tax Reform.

90 minutes and only one word from each of the candidates on the Life issue.

One question.

One word.

Grover Norquist asked, "Are you Pro-Life?"

They each replied, "Yes."

That was it. One word on Life. The biggest issue of our generation. The GOP has a Pro-Life plank. The Democrats and Obama represent the party of death.

Some 26 percent of the Jesus Followers followed Obama. And none of the RNC candidates talked about it. And how to persuade Life-Lovers to vote again with the Life Party.

We needed to hear more about what the new guy would do to Fight FOCA. And defend Life.

Dan Gilgoff at USNews & World Report though this was odd also and quoted Charmaine all a-Twitter, Would-Be Republican Party Chairmen Quiet on Faith at Candidate's Forum. Charmaine observed,

"It's nice that all the GOP candidates said 'yes' they are 'pro-life.' But there is slightly more to it than that."

The Republican party is the party of limited government, low taxes, strong defense, pro-life and pro-marriage. But we heard precious little of how conservative values differ from Obama and the Party of Abortion.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Visit Value Voters News, FightFoca campaign's first call to action is a success....

We appreciate Visionary Womanhood with As We Prepare for an Obama Administration . . .


Pro-Life; Preparing for an Obama Abortion Administration

December 30, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

aul_logo.jpgCharmaine sends this along,

As we prepare for an Obama Administration...

As we look toward celebrating the New Year on Wednesday night, my email box is filling up with end-of-year appeals, and I know yours is too.

Let me then be plain in telling you how much we appreciate your partnership with AUL this past year and as we head into the new one.

Many people have been asking me how things stand, and what our strategy will be, with an incoming presidential administration that has taken such a radical stance supporting abortion. The short answer: I am, frankly, heartened by the tremendous response of our AUL supporters each time we've asked you to stand for life.

First, we saw the remarkable response to AUL Action's FightFOCA petition. Pro-lifers are not giving in!

The signatures have continued rising, even over the Christmas
holiday, and now stand at over 350,000!

If you haven't signed yet, take a minute and add your voice at: www.FightFOCA.com.

I am also heartened by the response of AUL supporters to the 55-page Wish List pro-abortion forces sent to President-elect Obama. We asked you to enter comments on the document and now there are nearly 3,000 comments, mostly pro-life, on the site.

You can read them here: http://change.gov/open_government/entry/advancing_reproductive_rights_and_health_in_a_new_administration.

US News and World Report noted the surge in comments and observed that:

"But the volume of comments also shows that the pro-life movement is very much engaged right now and can be quickly activated."


(http://www.usnews.com/blogs/god-and-country/2008/12/23/pro-lifers-inundate-obama-website-with-comments.html)

That's encouraging!

Of course, a realist must acknowledge that no one really knows what the ground game will look like once we begin confronting an administration so radical that its leader, President-elect Obama, could not bring himself to vote in favor of protecting babies born alive after an abortion. And he is unwaveringly supported by the current leader of the world's largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood and its President Cecile Richards, who was the deputy chief of staff to the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi only three years ago.
donate_now.png
Even so -- even so! -- I remain hopeful. I have on my fireplace mantle a copy of the classic work, Streams in the Desert, which belonged to my grandparents. The entry to be read each January 6th, addresses the perennial question of uncertainty and recounts the example of the self-opening gate:

There is a self-opening gate which is sometimes used in country roads. It stands fast and firm across the road as a traveler approaches it. If he stops before he gets to it, it will not open. But if he will drive right at it, his wagon wheels press the springs below the roadway, and the gate swings back to let him through. He must push right on at the closed gate, or it will continue to be closed.

Then the author, Lettie Cowman, sums up by saying, "This illustrates the way to pass every barrier on the road of duty."

Duty is an old-fashioned word, rarely heard today. But the AUL team believes that it is indeed our duty, and a high calling, to stand against those who would promote the Culture of Death with every last resource that God grants us, regardless of the barriers that block the road ahead.

We will pray for wisdom, direction, and discernment. And then, we intend to run straight at the gate.

These are difficult times. I've talked with so many of you recently who have told me that you are standing with us, despite financial challenges. We are humbled -- and emboldened -- by your commitment.

Thank you for your faithful support which enables us to "press on and step out boldly."

Yours for life,
charmaine_signature.jpg
Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
Americans United for Life

PS: If you haven't yet made an end-of-year contribution, please do so today!

"As thou goest, step by step, I will open up the way. . ."

Proverbs 4:12 (Hebrew translation)



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Don't Drink the King's Wine, has AUL President's Encouragement Heading Into The New Year

Visit The Reagan Conservatives Blog.

See Beltway Blips.

Prayer Request for Our Nation!!! FOCA Act to be signed by President Obama :(

Why not Serve the Lord

Make a comment on Obama's web-site concerning FOCA and the 55 page pro-abortion mandate posted there....

See TruthSeekers

Thank you to Pro-Life Blogs, AUL President's Encouraging Anecdote Heading Into The New Year


What We Learned From Marley & Me

December 27, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

The Dancer, friend of all animals, wanted a date with Dad. And off we went to see the flicka that is making moviegoers cry across America.

She was one of the five million who read the book and wanted more.

Here's what we learned, as the 22 doggie-double Marleys gnawed their way across 15 years.

Yes, it is a dog story and no humans were hurt in the filming. But the lessons were made for the alphas in us all.

shadrach_yoest_dog_german_shepard_1995.png1) A dog is as much cost and effort as a child. Your Business Blogger(R) had a tamer Marley-like hundred pound German Shepherd: Shadrach, The Dog Genius, who chewed his way thru four houses. Shepherding our first two children. Dogs add more than they subtract. The shaggy dog is the origin of fuzzy math.

The Dreamer and The Dude at Shadrach's last Christmas, 1995

2) Dogs are a cost-center not a profit-center: a consumer of resources. But the indoor animals (with outdoor voices) generate enough goodwill to be an asset that doesn't need to be sold to be realized or appreciated. A lot like children.

3) The domestic animals do not always produce domestic tranquility. Until housebroken. Just as, Charmaine would say, husbands.

4) Moms and Dads always cry after a miscarriage. There's one in the movie. If you are Pro-Choice you have our permission not to look at the sonogram. Then again, go ahead. There was no heartbeat. One pregnancy in five miscarries. One woman in four has an abortion. There is a lot of crying in America, and it's not only over a dog in the Marley & Me movie.

5) Funerals are for the living. As Yogi Berra said, "Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours." There must be closure for the living over the dead. A miscarriage needs closure. An abortion needs closure. Too bad the Pro-Choice community insists that abortion is a private matter. Women (and the dads) would heal quicker with some remembrance of what was. What could have been. Funerals provide the venue for a good cry. Like dog movies.

Go read the book. Go see the movie. Take a date.

Even if you don't need a reason to cry.


Charmaine Quoted In US News & World Report
on FightFOCA, AUL Encourages Commenters

December 23, 2008 | By Jack Yoest



Join Fight FOCA
Charmaine was interviewed by Dan Gilgoff from USN&WR in Pro-Lifers Inundate Obama Website With Comments,

"The president of Americans United for Life, Charmaine Yoest, gave God & Country a heads-up that pro-lifers have inundated the Obama transition team's website with comments opposing passage of the Freedom of Choice Act, which would codify Roe v. Wade and strike down abortion restrictions currently on the books.

When she sent the E-mail last night, Yoest says, there were fewer than 200 comments responding to a memo titled "Advancing Reproductive Rights and Health in a New Administration," on the Obama site, change.gov. Now, there are almost 2,000 comments. Most--almost all, in fact--appear to be from abortion rights opponents."

Gilgoff researched the comments and reported that the comments of the Pro-lifers were consistently polite. Odd in the blogosphere. Alert the media.

"Comments areas are notorious for their nastiness, but I'm struck by the respectful tone of these protests.

[T]he volume of comments also shows that the pro-life movement is very much engaged right now and can be quickly activated. If he removes Bush-era abortion restrictions, as expected--like banning U.S. funds from going to foreign groups that offer or promote abortion in family planning services--Obama will face a firestorm of criticism. And should he move beyond such traditionally Democratic policies to actually expand abortion rights through a law like FOCA, pro-lifers would go ballistic. They're already watching closely."

Since Gilgoff's article appeared a few hours ago the pro-abortion liberals jumped into the comments section. Bringing the usual blog snarkiness and forcing the website moderators to work over time over the Christmas holidays. Readers are regularly now treated to,


This comment has been deleted by the administrator

Which was not seen before the abortionists joined the discussion. Abortion is a nasty business.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

How bad is the liberal nastyness? See blogger TBogg's hate for Charmaine and Michelle Malkin.

Even though Obama has promised to sign FOCA into law as his first order of business, he might consider doing politics in Your Nation's Capital a bit differently. A Change.

Alert Readers know that Your Business Blogger(R) teaches management skills to private clients and at the local college. One of the best bosses in the practice of management happens to be a woman, Carol Clews. She happens to run a center for pregnancy concerns. Carol emailed us about FOCA, the "Freedom of Choice Act,"

Mr. Obama, before you make such an important, life-depriving decision, will you please take time to visit a pregnancy center (like the one I'm director of here in Baltimore City) and see just what we do here. After all, you visited Planned Parenthood -- the least you can do is visit a place where truly ALL of a woman's options are discussed and she truly has freedom of choice.

Perhaps Obama will take note of Carol's suggestion. It would be good politics. For A Change.

See also Charmaine Quoted in God-O-Meter.

Consider The New Book by Dan Gilgoff.


Tell Obama To Stop Supporting FOCA

December 22, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

Charmaine sent this out to a few hundred thousand of her closest friends. Please sign the FightFOCA petition today.

FightFOCA-Email-Header.png

Tell Obama To Stop Supporting FOCA

Pro-abortion forces have given President-elect Obama 55 pages of instructions on what to do when he becomes President. A top priority? The "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA).

Some insist FOCA isn't a real threat, that we can stop it easily. But that's not what pro-life leaders on Capitol Hill are saying.

Last week, I was in a meeting with Representative Mike Pence of Indiana -- one of the key incoming House leaders -- and he listed FOCA as one of the top four threats he sees in the next few months.

The Obama transition website has posted the 55-page pro-abortion marching order and opened it up for comment.

Let's tell him to ignore it.

Click here to ask President-elect Obama to stop supporting FOCA. FOCA would eliminate every abortion-related law nationwide -- even common-sense laws that protect women and minors -- and force us to pay for the radical pro-abortion agenda with our tax dollars.

We can do it!

May you and your family have a Blessed Christmas.
charmaine_signature.jpg

Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D.
President & CEO
Americans United for Life Action
FightFOCA.com
FightFOCA@FightFOCA.com

P.S. -- The fight against FOCA is just beginning. Please forward this email to friends and family members who can help us Fight FOCA. And please consider making an end-of-year contribution to help us tell even more people about the dangers of FOCA.

________________________________



Join Fight FOCA
Quick Links
FightFOCA Petition
FightFOCA FAQ
About FightFOCA
About AUL Action

FightFOCA.com is a project of AUL Action

Chicago Office:
310 S Peoria St | Ste 500 | Chicago, IL 60607

DC Office:
1413 K Street, NW | Ste 1000 | Washington, DC 20005

A Project of AUL Action

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

As of tonight, Monday nite, there are almost 700 comments on Obama's website -- most comments look to be pro-life against FOCA. Tell Obama To Stop FOCA and protect our little girls.

See Involving the Parents by Ramesh Ponnuru at NRO.

See "Right of Conscience" Rule Passed. What's Next? By Anna Boyd

Brad Feld writes,

As I work my way through Vonnegut, my inner cynic is rewarded with gems from 40 years ago. For example:

Kilgore Trout (near the end of the book): "The problem is this: How to love people who have no use? In time, almost all men and women will become worthless as producers of goods, food, services, and more machines, as sources of practical ideas in the areas of economics, engineering, and probably medicine, too. So - if we can't find reasons and methods for treasuring human beings because they are human beings, then we might as well, as has so often been suggested, rub them out."

Don't try to understand it - it won't really make any sense without the context of the rest of the book. But - if you want a good jolt, read the book. One thing is for certain: Vonnegut knows how to string words together in a magical way.

Brad is a hi-tech, very bright, successful entrepreneur from Colorado. He supports abortion on demand: Abortion anytime for any reason; we might as well, as has so often been suggested, rub them out... Liberals are not logical.


Charmaine Quoted in CitizenLink,
Freedom of Conscience

December 20, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

If you fight against IL Gov. Rod Blagojevich, you might be a good-guy.

If you win against IL Gov. Rod Blagojevich, you might be on the side of the angels.

Charmaine was interviewed for CitizenLink, a division of Focus on the Family, Good News: Illinois Pharmacists Can Challenge Discriminatory Rule,

"This is a huge victory for the freedom of conscience of all health care providers," said Dr. Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life. "Pharmacists now have proper recourse against a discriminatory law that would force them to check their constitutional rights at the workplace door."

Here's how it started against Illinois governor Blago,

blagojevich_release_pharmacists_conscience-500x157.jpg


CitizenLink also quotes AUL's legal eagle Denise Burke,

in Good News: Regulations Protect Doctors' Freedom of Conscience

Life advocates are praising the timing of new government rules that protect health care providers' freedom of conscience.

The Department of Health and Human Services put the regulations in place last week to reinforce rules that protect doctors from being forced to participate in abortion and other anti-life practices.

"By releasing them now, they will be in the federal register for 30 days before the Obama administration takes office," said Denise Burke, vice president and legal director for Americans United for Life. "For that reason, the Obama administration cannot simply erase these rules."

Join Fight FOCA


Planned Parenthood's Cecile Richards does not care for rights of conscience. (Except her own conscience -- don't even think about asking her about her own abortion.) David G. Savage at LA Times writes, Health providers' 'conscience' rule to take effect
The last-minute Bush administration declaration lets doctors, clinics, receptionists and others refuse to give care they find morally objectionable
.
"We are shocked that the Bush administration chose to finalize its midnight regulation and to take this parting shot at women's health and ignore patients' rights to receive critical healthcare services and information they deserve," said Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in a statement. "We look forward to working with President-elect Obama and leaders in Congress to repeal this disastrous rule and expand patients' access to full healthcare information and services, not limit it."

planned_parenthood_child_blacks.jpg

Many of the abortions at Planned Parenthood are performed to rid the world of African-American babies. This is one lucky baby girl.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Other related news,

LifeSiteNews reports, Illinois Supreme Court Decision Supports Conscience Rights of Pharmacists

Dr. Charmaine Yoest, Americans United for Life (AUL) President and CEO, responded to the Supreme Court decision, stating, "This is a huge victory for the freedom of conscience of all healthcare providers. Pharmacists now have proper recourse against a discriminatory law that would force them to check their constitutional rights at the workplace door."


"Conscience Rule" to take effect

See the Americans United for Life Amicus Curiae Brief

CathNewsUSA writes, "Conscience" rule to cover health providers

Not everyone believes in conscientious objection. Not liberals, anyway. See, Are There Limits to the So-Called "Conscience Rule?"

Visit (and bookmark) Jill Stanek, Breaking news: IL Supreme Court rules for pharmacists/against Blagojevich

See AUL's press release, Americans United for Life Applauds Illinois Supreme Court Decision Supporting Constitutional Rights of Pharmacists

Deep Thoughts doesn't like the conscience clause either -- But note: Mojoey does refer to the Pro-Life position as, well, Pro-Life. An honest liberal! Who knew?

Alert the (Mainstream) Media!

...

Never mind.

See The Center blog.

Visit Social Developments Americans United for Life Applauds Adoption of HHS Rules Protecting Freedom of Conscience, Urges Vigilance in Protecting Both Providers and Healthcare Access

More from AUL on HHS conscience protection.


Defending Life 2009 from
Americans United for Life

December 10, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

Following is the introduction to upcoming Defending Life 2009 from AUL by Charmaine

charmaine_yoest_pew_2006_1.jpg Dear Friends of Life:

Welcome to Defending Life 2009, our third edition of this annual compendium of resources related to advancing law that undergirds our Culture of Life.

Charmaine at The Pew Forum on Religion and Politics

charmaine_yoest_pew_2006_2.jpg

As we go to print on this year's edition, we do so in the midst of tumultuous times.

charmaine_yoest_pew_2006_3.jpg

Faced with an incoming presidential administration that has a stated commitment to advancing an anti-life agenda as a fundamental precept, coupled with leadership on Capitol Hill similarly hostile to defending life, both of which have strong ties to a newly energized abortion industry . . . understandably, many people have been asking: What now? Which way?



Join Fight FOCA
The current Defending Life 2008 is available in readable sections at AUL Defending Life.

continue reading at the jump

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Charlie Butts writing at OneNewsNow posts, Focusing on FOCA, fighting for life,

Americans United for Life (AUL) is already gearing up for a major thrust to defeat the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) -- a piece of legislation that Barack Obama, in a speech to Planned Parenthood, promised would be one of his top priorities upon taking office. Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of AUL, explains what would happen if FOCA is enacted.

"The Freedom of Choice Act would eliminate every single abortion restriction that's been passed at the state level in the past 30 years," says Yoest. "It would completely federalize the abortion issue...it's just an extremist piece of legislation."

Yoest says her organization is depending on a grassroots effort to head off passage. "We have a website [FightFOCA.org] and it's a one-stop shop where people can read the text of the bill, they can get constitutional analysis from our attorneys, and most importantly they can go and sign our petition against FOCA."

See Freedom of Choice Act FOCA posting at by Andrew Biddinger

The Brown Pelican Society of Harahan, Louisiana has FightFOCA.com.


Continue Reading »

Planned Parenthood Rape Cover-up: Is a Sting Operation Ethical?

December 6, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

Planned Parenthood has covered up another rape. Or did they?


Indiana Planned Parenthood Covers Up Sexual Abuse of 13-year Old -

Planned Parenthood
Rape cover up
LifeNews reports,

Lila Rose, a UCLA student journalist and president of right-to-life advocacy group Live Action, posing as a 13-year-old seeking abortion. In an appointment with a Planned Parenthood nurse, Rose says she has been impregnated by a 31-year-old man, a clear case of child molestation punishable as a felony under Indiana state law.


On tape, the nurse acknowledges her responsibility to report the abuse, but assures Rose she will not. The nurse says, "I am supposed to report to Child Protective Services," but tells Rose, "Okay, I didn't hear the age [of the 31-year-old]. I don't want to know the age."


She then instructs Rose how to obtain a secret abortion by crossing state lines to avoid Indiana's parental consent law.


The nurse also coaches Rose to cover for the 31-year-old man by saying he is only 14. She says, "You've seen him around, you know he's 14, he's in your grade and whatever. You know what I mean."

The diminutive and talented Lila Rose can act like and pass for a 13 year-old and appeared on Hannity and Colmes Friday December 5th.

The liberal Alan Colmes went after Lila for misleading Planned Parenthood and "filing a false report" and taking up "valuable staff time" for a problem that did not exist.

Did Lila Rose cross an ethical line in a sting operation on Planned Parenthood?

No.

Your Business Blogger(R) teaches business ethics at the local college. The bright line in ethics is Quo Bono? Who Benefits?

Is there unjust enrichment?

Lila did not enrich herself by exposing a malicious, felonious intent of a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic.

Even though posed Lila as a 13 year-old, is this action actionable? Is it a lie?

I would submit that Lila's act was a misdirection that all businesses should welcome and use.

Decades ago Your Business Blogger(R) worked as a sales rep for a manufacturer producing a private label product for a national retailer. It was a part of my job description to regularly "shop" my client to test their salesman's product knowledge, sales techniques, in store displays and product availability.

I reported my findings to the store manager and my boss.

I did indeed take up "valuable staff time" as Colmes would charge in a sting operation. Managers would recognize this exercise as the 'control' part of managing. To learn what the store is doing right.

Or, in the case of Planned Parenthood, what the business is doing wrong.

Planned Parenthood should thank Lila Rose for acting as a "mystery shopper" providing valuable feedback on the conduct of the Planned Parenthood abortion operations.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Planned Parenthood does not have the integrity to process the 360 millions of our tax dollars. Planned Parenthood should be defunded.

And Planned Parenthood president, Cecile Richards (with her million dollar salary), and the so called 'Freedom of Choice Act' FOCA should be stopped. Join FightFOCA.com

"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just"-Thomas Jefferson. See Values Voter.

Charles Lewis, at National Post has Obama bill could fan flames of abortion debate.


Bio Medicine
has
Americans United for Life Urges State Legislatures to Oppose Federal Power Grab: Provides Model Resolution Denouncing Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA)
'Freedom of Choice' Act Promotes Extreme Abortion Agenda

CNS News, Faith-Based Hospitals Could Close If Obama Signs Freedom of Choice Act


Media Alert: Charmaine Debates Planned Parenthood
Gift Cards on MSNBC

December 4, 2008 | By Jack Yoest

planned_parenthood_giftcard_2008_holiday.JPG Over 50 per cent of Americans will purchase gift cards this year.

Will you be getting one from Planned Parenthood?

Not likely.

Americans don't like to talk about abortion.

Much less paying for one.

Leslie Olsen at WISHtv.com writes,

Gift certificates for Planned Parenthood,

The certificates come in $25 increments.

"They can be [used] for sexually transmitted disease screenings,..." said Struben-Hall.

Some Hoosiers 24-Hour News 8 talked to asked if the gift certificates could be used towards abortions. The answer is yes. But, Planned Parenthood said that's not the purpose of the gift certificates.

planned_parenthood_cash.jpgPlanned Parenthood earns income from abortions and is attempting to re-brand their image. They are attempting to emphasize birth control (from Planned Parenthood's early days in eugenics) away from abortion; the Final Solution Birth Control.

But abortion is, well, birth control and a revenue stream for Planned Parenthood.

Charmaine will be on MSNBC News Now today, Thursday, December 3rd Eastern. Hit time is 2:30.

Please tune in and let us know how you think the marketing debate went.

***

Marketing is reach, frequency and awareness. Planned Parenthood is using constant repetition -- frequency -- to persuade the public that they are (Reproductive) Health Clinics and not Abortion clinics.

Planned Parenthood does not want the public to be aware that the new gift cards could be used for abortions.

Leslie Olsen continues,

Planned Parenthood hopes philanthropists look at it differently. The organization hopes people might purchase the certificates, and then turn them back in for their patients who need reproductive healthcare, but can't pay for it.

Planned Parenthood is not even pretending to sell the gift cards for services -- the cards are simply a re-gifting vector for donations.

planned_parenthood_condom_keychain.jpg Planned Parenthood Condom Key Chains
Gift card sales totaled $97 billion in 2007, up from $83 billion in 2006, according to data from The Tower Group cited in The New York Times.

Gift Certificate usage among recipients is about 85 per cent, meaning that some 15 per cent are never redeemed.

This means that some 15 billion dollars are left on the table -- money consumers paid and that businesses didn't have to deliver.

One of Your Business Blogger(R)'s clients in India sells pre-paid phone cards. He loves them and the cash-flow. He says, "One in seven cards are never used; cash straight to the bottom line, upfront."

The low redemption rate of gift cards has spawned an opportunity for entrepreneurs to collect and repackage and re-sell. Cash re-gifting. The data on the secondary market for gift cards is fascinating: 1 adult in 6 "re-gifts" a Gift Certificate.

But I doubt that there would be a gray market for the Planned Parenthood Gift Certificates.

(Ramesh Ponnuru reminds us, "No mother wants to introduce her son, the abortionist." No one is going to give or re-gift a gift card, "Here's $50 toward your next abortion...
Here's a Benjamin for your next STD...")

There is much confusion on the Abortionist's money making Industry. But what is sure is that no one wants to talk about that most common of surgical procedures: elective abortions.

***
Your Business Blogger(R) has an interest in a number of advertising and promotional companies. So I am most interested in the branding methods that Planned Parenthood uses in the marketing of their "health" services.

The Planned Parenthood Condom Key Chain line is one of my "favorites." I am not so sure that it is a big seller...

Planned Parenthood, Wear Your Rubbers


planned_parenthood_wear-your-rubbers-keychain.jpg In a fashion, we applaud Planned Parenthood for their marketing innovation to attract donations.

Go get money directly from the public. Then maybe Planned Parenthood will not demand the 300 million tax dollars from Americans who do not want to pay for anyone's abortions.

This is not likely: Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood earns a million dollar salary to manage the Planned Parenthood billion dollar empire. To get all the revenue she can -- even bailouts from the taxpayer.



Join Fight FOCA

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Planned Parenthood is not about to go bankrupt. But many businesses -- including car manufacturers, I hope -- are in for trouble in the coming Obama administration. Do not bother with any Gift Certificate from a company headed for Chapter 11; they do not have to be honored.

Help fight Planned Parenthood. Help Fight FOCA.

See Jill Stanek on The Party of Death by Ramesh Ponnuru.

Read Margaret Sanger, Barack Obama & Planned Parenthood, Where Sanger says, "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

Remember to FIGHT FOCA.

And visit Godless.

We appreciate The Sanctity of Human Life.

Americans United for Life Urges State Legislatures to Oppose Federal Power Grab: Provides Model Resolution Denouncing Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA)

UPDATE: MSNBC just canceled the segment...at 2:11pm. Some might say at the last minute -- This is showbizness. The (other) bailout hearing is pre-empting. [GM's CEO says that his company failed "due to events beyond his control." He forgets that his job, as CEO is to control events -- or to so structure his company as to minimize disaster. He did neither. The GM board should fire him.]


Will FOCA Pass Congress?

December 2, 2008 | By Jack Yoest



Join Fight FOCA
Yes, unless we stop it.

Unfortunately the proposed law has got friends.

FOCA is the proposed legislation that would eliminate all regulation and oversight of abortion. No parental notification for minors. No licensed doctors doing the cutting.

So how can we be so sure FOCA might be a-coming?

Because of the relationships of Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood.

***

I've had both a dot gov email address and ran a dot com software company; now I teach.

At the start of every semester, Your Business Blogger(R) instructs my class on how Business Gets Done.

It is not technique. It is not brilliance. It is not killer apps. It is not resources. It is not capital.

Business Gets Done thru relationships.

The Business of Politics is no different.

Barack Obama promised Cecile Richards that FOCA would be the first item of law that Obama would sign.

Obama will sign FOCA because it will be forced thru congress.cecile_richards_obama.jpg

It will be forced thru congress because Nancy Pelosi wants FOCA.

Nancy Pelosi wants FOCA because Cecile Richards wants FOCA.

Cecile Richards, Barack Obama

Here is where Cecile Richards earns her million dollar salary:

Cecile and Nancy are very close. And not because Planned Parenthood gives campaign donations to Democrats.

Cecile Richards used to work for Nancy Pelosi.

Cecile Richards served as Deputy Chief of Staff for Pelosi when Nancy was House Minority Leader.

Cecile served her boss well. Pelosi will reward Cecile Richard's loyal service; good friends. Kindred spirits. Pro-Abortion.

Relationships. Get Business Done.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

Stop them both: Please visit fightFOCA and sign the petition.

The petition has almost reached 299,000. If you are number 300,000, please let us know for a special treat.
If FOCA gets anywhere get ready for a cultural battle!!!

See Ladies for Life

Why I decided not to be an abortionist.


Something Matters


What Planet are you living on?

See Americans United for Life blog.


FightFOCA in the Media

December 1, 2008 | By Jack Yoest



Join Fight FOCA
Liberals whine,
Don't Like abortion?
Don't have one.

Conservatives remind,
Don't like abortion?
Don't pay for one.

Obama's so called "Freedom of [abortion] Choice Act" (FOCA) would force taxpayers to buy abortions here and abroad.

And it would appear that there will be tax increases to fund abortions on demand.

FOCA would eradicate state and federal laws that the majority of Americans support, such as:

* Bans on Partial Birth Abortion * Requirements that women be given information about the risks of getting an abortion * Only licensed physicians can perform abortions * Parents must be informed and give consent to their minor daughter's abortion

FOCA would erase these laws and prevent states from enacting similar protective measures in the future.

Please visit FightFOCA

Currents signers number over 293,000. When you sign, you will be able to see your number. Let us know if you've signed and what you number was -- we are looking for number 300,000. You will be recognized!

Following and at the jump are websites that have mentioned the petition by Americans United for Life.

###

Thank you (foot)notes:

If Your Business Blogger(R) has missed your citation for the FightFOCA petition.

Wikipedia

Don't Drink the King's Wine


JIMMY AKIN.ORG: Fight FOCA


Reflections of a Paralytic
» Fight FOCA, Sign the petition to help AUL fight FOCA. ...

Fight FOCA Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth
Nov 15, 2008 ... Please read the expert analysis by Americans United for Life (AUL) and sign the Fight FOCA petition at: http://www.FightFOCA.com. Thank you! ...

Les Femmes - the truth: FIGHT FOCA!

ADF Alliance Alert
Campaign To Fight FOCA Under Way

Care2 - Sign the Fight FOCA Petition
Americans United for Life (AUL) , a pro-life law and policy organization; Please add your name to the Fight FOCA petition and let your friends know ...

FIGHT FOCA - Please read even if you are Pro-Choice - *Taking Back ...
Please read the expert analysis by Americans United for Life (AUL) and sign the Fight FOCA petition at: http://www.FightFOCA.com ...


Continue Reading »

Will Obama Forget FOCA? Should Parents FightFOCA?

November 29, 2008 | By Charmaine Yoest



So Obama keeps Bush man Gates as SecDef. Some hints at not raising taxes. Wants to reduce abortion.

Is Obama governing like a, gasp, Republican?

Will Obama not push for the so called "Freedom of Choice Act" FOCA?

No.

Obama might surrender in Iraq and to Iran even with Gates, but Obama will never surrender on FOCA.

Cecile Richards and Barack Obamacecile_richards_obama.jpg

Three reasons why Obama will fight for FOCA,

Obama will sign whatever Reid-Pelosi pass thru congress.

Obama will not veto FOCA. He does not have the political capital nor the political will to resist. Planned Parenthood paid too much money to be ignored. Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood will earn her million dollar W-2. And Hillary will not let him forget FOCA.

Obama will keep his campaign promise.
FOCA will be the first legislation Obama will sign. When Your Business Blogger(R) did a tour of duty in government the fixed point, guiding star were Campaign Promises. They were a matter a public re