<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Reasoned Audacity</title>
      <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/</link>
      <description>. . .daily commentary on public policy, business, and culture.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:51:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.1</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>The Dangers of Nuclear Power</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Is nuclear power safe?  John Howland and his vast readership offer observations on nuke power on its most intimate terms:  a submarine. </p>

<p>And how's that working?</p>

<blockquote>From the other side of the leaded glass pane....
 
 I spent three years and five specops in fast attacks and enjoy showing nuke-doubters my radiological med-record for that period: I received less high-energy bombardment that if I had been on a small boy or (sorry for forgetting...) fossil-fueled CV deployed anywhere.  0. ZERO.   
</blockquote>
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sub_pentaposse_philadelphia_yoest.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sub_pentaposse_philadelphia_yoest.php','popup','width=300,height=225,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sub_pentaposse_philadelphia_yoest-thumb-200x150.jpg" width="200" height="150" alt="sub_pentaposse_philadelphia_yoest.JPG" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>  <blockquote>[The Penta-Posse is pictured in the forward torpedo room of a WWII submarine.  There is not much more room in the new subs.]
<br>

<p>And that was with about half of my workspaces next to the Tunnel, just forward and a deck or two above the you-know-what.  Whatever other scientific wonders we were near is unknown to me, but I once heard a rumor that our detachment's  enlisted people slept in the torpedo room.<br />
<br><br />
It being true in any endeavor of consequence that "One Oh-heck" wipes out a billion atta-boys, the nuclear field cannot tolerate any mistakes greater than a burnt out lightbulb, and our erstwhile Comradette Jane used her cinematic best to take it well beyond the Pale in that regard.  <br />
<br><br />
Chernobyl's long term effects will not be known for several thousand years, but there are data that suggest BOTH that life of both flora and fauna types were impacted by the 1986 accident AND  that renewed organic chemistry has burgeoned there since  a couple of years after it.  For fascinating details, see website "kidofspeed.com" a photographic reportage made by a recklessly brave (kinda cute, too!) Ukrainian lady motorcyclist who managed to enter the permanently closed region around the defunct power plant and record its emptiness for posterity.  Thanks be, Chernobyl did not start Nuclear Winter -- and our photog lives to do other reckless things (politics, for one) without her suntan turning into a full-body keloid scar.<br />
 <br />
 "Wer rastet, rostet," the Germans say: "He who stops, rusts."  What, with the clear and present danger of merely being alive faces us TODAY, nuclear power, with its Rickoverian no-mistake rules looks mighty advantageous to this former cryppie.<br />
 <br />
 If we don't have some new benefits from same, who will provide all that electricity to cook the Sierra Club's granola bars, assemble their Birkenstocks, or to blend blue and yellow basic colors to make green ones?<br />
 <br />
 Forgive an old salt for waxing poetic over an X-ray film, but....<br />
 <br />
 Steve<br />
=============================================</p>

<p><br />
If <em>France </em>can manage to produce 80% of their power from nuclear piles, I have to think we have it within us to do likewise.</p>

<p>With vast respect & ear-trumpets for sea-daddies everywhere,</p>

<p>Jason W.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>There is no way to eliminate all risk on this side of eternity.  Nuclear power is the safest method to generate power.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_dangers_of_nuclear_power.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_dangers_of_nuclear_power.php</guid>
         <category>politics</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:51:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Congressional Hearing on Military Readiness and Homosexuals</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel will be conducting a hearing on the issue of homosexuals in the military.  Among the witnesses who will offer testimony will be Brian Jones, a highly-decorated former Sergeant Major of the US Army's elite Delta Force, who served with the Department of Defense in Iraq in 2004.  </p>

<p>Sgt. Maj. Jones will testify in support of the 1993 law stating that homosexuals are not eligible for military service. The law passed Congress with veto-proof majorities in 1993 and has been upheld as constitutional several times.<br />
 <br />
The hearing will take place in Room 2118 of the House Rayburn Office Building, at 2:00 PM on Wednesday, 23 July .</p>

<p>John Howland from USNA-at-Large sends this along from Allan Slaff,</p>

<blockquote>I am delighted that...Sergeant Major Jones will be on hand to testify before the House Armed Service Committee on Personnel on 23 July in regards to gays in the military.</blockquote>
 </br>
 <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/homosexual_sailor.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/homosexual_sailor.php','popup','width=175,height=265,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/homosexual_sailor-thumb-200x302.jpg" width="200" height="302" alt="homosexual_sailor.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span><blockquote>I am confident that...he will do a superb job. I have a concern...on the unique sociological problems that would be generated by permitting openly practicing gays to serve in the ships of the fleet. These unsolvable problems make it absolutely impossible to permit that to happen.
</br>

<p>Let me summarize here:<br />
</br></p>

<p>The habitability standards under which our enlisted personnel serve in the ships of the fleet afford almost no possibilities for human privacy. I examined the habitability standards afforded our bluejackets at sea for the Secretary of the Navy many years ago and found that the habitability standards afforded our enlisted personal in the ships of the fleet were less than 50% of the habitability standards allowed our federal prisoners.<br />
</br></p>

<p>Other than a privacy curtain which may be pulled across a man's berth, there is none. Outside that small space of  stacked berths the remainder of the compartment is completely open; thus public nakedness is the norm. The same applies to  the heads,  washrooms and showers.</p>

<p>These ships deploy for normally 9 months at a time and sometimes much longer. Unlike our air force and army personnel there is no leaving the base after normal working hours except on very restricted liberties when in foreign ports from time to time. <br />
 </br><br />
That compartment is our bluejackets' home 24/7 as long as the ship is deployed. It would create a truly impossible sociological situation to permit openly gay personnel to live in such an environment.<br />
</br><br />
It would most assuredly wreak havoc with the good order and discipline of the ships company Requiring gays to abstain for long periods would be akin to berthing two heterosexual men in a compartment of essentially naked women for long periods; especially when those  young men were being driven by an absolute rush off hormones.  Impossible!<br />
</br><br />
There is another issue. Homosexuals are as intellectually capable as heterosexuals. Therefore, eventually the gay will win advancement in rate. He will then be in a powerful position to bring exquisite sexual pressure on the non-rated personnel under his control.<br />
</br><br />
As you know, I am also opposed to women serving in the combatant ships of the fleet. I base my opposition not on any failure of intelligence, courage, patriotism or ability of women. <br />
</br><br />
It is based solely on the absolute impossibility of  eliminating the powerful drive of sexuality. At least, however, in the case of the women, they may be isolated  into  their own living accommodations on board ship.<br />
</br><br />
Instead of establishing my qualifications to speak with authority on this vitally important issue, I shall send along an abbreviated curriculum vitae. Please note the enormous experience I have had in serving in eleven ships of the fleet and commanding four of our very best.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Under a B. Hussein Obama administration, homosexuals will be allowed to openly serve in the armed forces.  As Allan notes, this will destroy unit cohesion and hurt our military readiness.</p>

<p>Military Readiness will not matter under Obama anyhoo.  He will simply surrender to the jihadists making our military power moot.</p>

<p>Voting for John McCain is important.  He knows how to run the military.</p>

<p>B. Hussein Obama is an accomplished community organizer.</p>

<center>###</center>

<p>Thank you (foot)notes:</p>

<p>Update: Alert Reader CourtneyMD comments below on the need for the presentation of a compelling argument rather than two homosexuals pictured enjoying a cruise.  This may help:</p>

<p>CourtneyMD, You are close: I'm not 14, but this is an argument any 14-year-old understands.  Even My 15-year-old daughter.</p>

<p>We all may not have the reasoning power of a 14-year-old, but let us attempt a review.</p>

<p>The arguments are simple to comprehend, especially for those few that have served in the armed forces.</p>

<p>Close quarters, intimate surroundings strip away modesty.  It does not promote good order and discipline in a military unit to enable sexual attraction. The military mission does not have the margin of error to tolerant the distraction caused by having a girlfriend or boyfriend in arm's reach in harm's way 24/7.  </p>

<p>See close quarters -- men and women -- <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/how_one_woman_serves.php">on a submarine</a>.</p>

<p>This is different than the soft civilian life most people enjoy, even in dangerous occupations. Females and homosexual firefighters and police-persons can go off-duty.</p>

<p>Can't really go off-duty on a submarine.  </p>

<p>In the absence of privacy, no person -- whatever they may tell the pollsters -- does not want other service members lusting after their bodies.</p>

<p>A sailor wants his buddy to watch his back -- not covet his backside.</p>

<p>As requested, see a compelling argument for <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2007/03/general_pace_gets_morality_rig.php">unit cohesion</a>.</p>

<p>And let's not forget B. Hussein Obama's other sugar stick <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2005/10/hidden_agenda_women_in_combat.php">women in combat</a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/media_alert_charmaine_on_cnn_o.php">B. Hussein Obama and Jesus</a>.</p>

<p>Double standards for <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2007/05/todays_miltary_mission_win_war.php">women in the military</a>.</p>

<p>And thank you for noticing the repetition of B. Hussein Obama -- and thank you for repeating it back.  Perhaps you are trainable.</p>

<p>Repeating back a negative is something even the professionals have trouble with.  See the <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/04/tony_snow_bimbos.php">Bimbo Awards with the late Tony Snow</a>.</p>

<p>Your Business Blogger(R) works at teaching business sense.  Here, we are reduced to teaching common sense.</p>

<p>Thank you for commenting,<br />
Jack</p>

<p>See <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/23/AR2008072303642.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=AR">Dana Milbank from the WaPo.</a>  Your Business Blogger(R) is not related to the Cynthia Yost mentioned in the Milbank article</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/congressional_hearing_on_milit.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/congressional_hearing_on_milit.php</guid>
         <category>Military Readiness</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:25:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>USS Bonefish SS-223 Patch</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Alert Reader Richard Neault sends this email, </p>

<blockquote>Mr. Yoest,

<p>I was stationed on the Bonefish (SS-582)from 1984-1988. In 1988 we had a fire that killed three of our friends and ended the career of the Bonefish. I had met the widow of the CO of the first Bonefish when she presented the crew with a Holy Bible. </p>

<p>I have been assembling different items for a framed tribute piece for both the first and second bonefish. I have always been fascinated with the first boat and what happened to her. </p>

<p>I have been trying to find information about the battleflag of the first bonefish and have been unable to. I have also been trying to find an original, or at least a good reproduction, of the patch from the first bonefish. If you can help me with either of these items, I would be very grateful. I am in the process of founding a local museum about the Cold War and hope one day to place these items in the museum. It must have been an honor to have had a father who was a part of the Greatest Generation. </p>

<p>I appreciate his service to our country.</p>

<p>Please tell your wife that I also appreciate the things she has done and that we are one family that appreciates the FRC and the real conservatives in politics.</p>

<p>Richard Neault<br />
<a href="http://www.calcoldwar.org/">www.calcoldwar.org</a></blockquote></p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/bonefish_patch_yoest010.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/bonefish_patch_yoest010.php','popup','width=500,height=486,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/bonefish_patch_yoest010-thumb-200x194.jpg" width="200" height="194" alt="bonefish_patch_yoest010.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>  Here is the patch of which he may be speaking.  I would be honored to donate the <em>Bonefish </em>artifact to the museum, if the item would be helpful.</p>

<p>If there are other Alert Readers who might have items of interest, please contact Mr. Neault through his website -- or email <a href="mailto:jack@yoest.org">Your Business Blogger(R)</a></p>

<center>###</center>

<p>Thank you (foot)notes:</p>

<p>Also see <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2007/06/uss_bonefish_lost.php">USS Bonefish Lost: A Remembrance 18 June</a></p>

<p>See Virtual Paintings of <em>Bonefish </em>by <a href="http://www.tommcmahon.net/">Tom McMahon</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/uss_bonefish_ss223_patch.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/uss_bonefish_ss223_patch.php</guid>
         <category>War</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:35:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Obama Abortion Marketing Machine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Your Business Blogger(R) teaches business, marketing and management at the local college.  </p>

<p>I like to remind students and clients that the hardest product to sell is an intangible, an idea.  The easier product to pitch has tangible characteristics -- it has a form that can be introduced through the senses, a product that can be seen and touched.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side1.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side1.php','popup','width=250,height=205,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side-thumb-200x164.jpg" width="200" height="164" alt="sonogram_side_by_side.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>One of the most interesting marketing campaigns of the century is the promotion of abortion as 'choice' and 'reproductive freedom.'  </p>

<p>And for many, abortion has become a vote-changing issue during the current presidential campaign.</p>

<p>To learn more about this interesting abortion-vote market segment, I stepped out of the DC summer heat in Your Nation's Capital and sat in on an off-the-record meeting on abortion polling data for battle ground states.</p>

<p>The confidential numbers revealed that 57% of the public was self-identified as Pro-Life.</p>

<p>This raised two marketing questions:<br />
<blockquote>1) Why is Obama still actively embracing an abortion position? And,</p>

<p>2) How did the country move from supporting abortion rights to Pro-Life?</blockquote></p>

<p>I was curious about the Obama Abortion Marketing Machine.  He is in favor of abortion and in denying medical treatment of some infants born alive.  He aggressively supports the feminist's power position of control of a mother over her baby.</p>

<p>Power is an intangible and intangibles are normally a 'difficult sell' as we old sales guys are wont to say.    It seems odd that any seller of public policy would take pride in working this hard.  </p>

<p>But this intangible is what has sold in the past -- a woman's complete control over her body and absolute power over her destiny, even if this meant killing her unborn baby.  Power sells and people will pay most anything to get it, use it and to project the appearance of power.   </p>

<p>It was absolute power.  And <em>Absolute power corrupts absolutely</em>.</p>

<p>But it was not Lord Acton's theorem that changed the mind of the American public.  It was a picture.  Or rather two pictures:</p>

<blockquote>A) If a woman sees a picture, a sonogram of her baby, she will not have an abortion.

<p>B) The Chicago hospital room where babies can be left to die.</blockquote></p>

<p>Nurse Jill Stanek has the story and original reporting of the Chicago hospital's "<a <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/abortion_born_alive_comfort_room_stanek.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/abortion_born_alive_comfort_room_stanek.php','popup','width=493,height=324,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/abortion_born_alive_comfort_room_stanek-thumb-200x131.jpg" width="200" height="131" alt="abortion_born_alive_comfort_room_stanek.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span><a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/06/in_march_2002_t.html">Comfort Room</a>" where babies born alive are left to die without medical intervention.  She has more pictures.</p>

<p>Polite society might call this 'infanticide.' Calling the venue a "Comfort Room" is clever marketing.  Like "Pro-Choice."  A case study on word framing to sell.  Brilliant. </p>

<p>But the new pictures are powerful images that can now sell the product:  a child.</p>

<p><strong>The tangible <em>child </em>is trumping the intangible <em>power</em>.</strong></p>

<p>This provides a clear choice this presidential election between a women's power and a person's right to life.</p>

<p>McCain is Pro-Life.</p>

<p>Obama has a clear pro-abortion position:  He would sign the Planned Parenthood backed Freedom of Choice Act which codifies <em>Roe v Wade</em>:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pf0XIRZSTt8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pf0XIRZSTt8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0XIRZSTt8"><br />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0XIRZSTt8</a><br />
 <br />
<center>###</center></p>

<p>Thank you (foot)notes:</p>

<p>Bill Bennett and <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/">Jill Stanek</a> on Obama Abortion</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QPZCXcTwZPY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QPZCXcTwZPY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY&NR=1"><br />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY&NR=1<br />
</a></p>

<p><em>Jack and Charmaine also blog at</em> <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/">Reasoned Audacity</a>.<em>   Your Business Blogger(R) of </em><a href="http://www.yoest.com">Management Training of DC, LLC</a>, <em> is a licensed agent for the William Oncken Corporation presenters of Managing Management Time(TM) fondly known as Monkey Management. </em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_obama_abortion_marketing_m.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_obama_abortion_marketing_m.php</guid>
         <category>Abortion</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:13:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>A Four Star Tool; Generally Speaking for Obama</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The following was made available thru John Howland at USNA-AT-Large and deserves a wide audience.</em></p>

<p>General to General</p>

<p>Richard Carroll asked my opinion of General Tony McPeak, and his<br />
current support of the far, Socialist-Left.  He is co-chairman of<br />
Obama's National Election Committee.  I have been asked the same<br />
question by many others.</p>

<p>Rich wrote this and asked for as much coverage as possible...</p>

<p>I consider this a weak version of how I really feel about Wesley<br />
Clark, Tony McPeak, the traitor Army Generals, and the rest of their<br />
ilk who are supporting the far-left in this election.  </p>

<p>Most, if not all, waited until they thought there was a predictable winner to the<br />
Democratic nomination, then ran to show their support in hopes of<br />
receiving a Cabinet appointment after the election.  This is<br />
absolutely unforgivable to me, and the majority of the military<br />
members that I served with for upward to 35 years.  In my opinion,<br />
they are supporting the destruction of our military, and willing to<br />
do irreparable damage to our country strictly for their own personal gain.</p>

<p>J. C.<br />
B/G, USAF, Ret.<br />
==========================================<br />
A Four Star Tool;<br />
Generally Speaking</p>

<p>by Rich Carroll</p>

<p>'As one who for 37 years proudly wore the uniform of our<br />
country'.  General Merrill 'Tony' McPeak, Co-Chairman of Barack<br />
Hussein Obama Campaign.</p>

<p>History, General, will remember you by not how proudly you wore your<br />
uniform, but by how you betrayed our trust and by how defiantly your<br />
current boss refuses to wear an American flag pin.  </p>

<p>Veterans will remember you for choosing to support a political party that trashes<br />
and degrades our military.  You have separated yourself from 'those<br />
who served' to become entrenched with a candidate inextricably<br />
connected to a political and religious cult determined to control<br />
America and murdering millions in their effort to do so.  <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/a_four_star_tool_generally_spe.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/a_four_star_tool_generally_spe.php</guid>
         <category>War</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 20:53:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Leadership Development Carnival is Up</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The new <a href="http://greatleadershipbydan.blogspot.com/2008/07/leadership-development-carnival-1.html">Leadership Development Carnival #1</a> is up and running at <a href="http://greatleadershipbydan.blogspot.com/">Great Leadership</a>, hosted by Dan McCarthy. The Carnival is a clearing house of leadership and leadership development advice and commentary from over 30 leadership pundits, including Your Business  Blogger(R).</p>

<p>Carnivals serve a vital function in the blogosphere that is missing in most conventional blogs:  Editorial oversight.</p>

<p>Dan McCarthy does this ably and without direct compensation.  Bloggers work for links and traffic.  <a href="http://greatleadershipbydan.blogspot.com/">Go visit</a>.</p>

<p>Dan will be working as the editor of the Leadership Development Carnival every month. If you'd like to submit an article, use the <a href="http://blogcarnival.com/bc/cprof_4378.html">carnival submission form</a>.</p>

<p>My humble submission was <a href="http://www.yoest.com/2008/06/17/the-four-speeches-every-speaker-delivers/">The Four Speeches Every Speaker Delivers</a>.</p>

<p>Most people fear public speaking more than death itself.  The public-speakers'-adrenaline rush forces the talker to review his podium performance.  </p>

<p>And while there at <a href="http://greatleadershipbydan.blogspot.com/2008/07/leadership-development-carnival-1.html">Great Leadership</a> be sure to visit <a href="http://blog.selectcourses.com/keeping-your-study-skills-razor-sharp">Keeping Your Study Skills Razor Sharp</a> that I may have to <strike>steal</strike> <a href="http://www.yoest.com/">borrow for my students</a>.</p>

<p> <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_leadership_development_car.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/the_leadership_development_car.php</guid>
         <category>Blogosphere</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:43:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>London Bombings:  July 7, 2005; The USA Has Not Been Attacked</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Charmaine calls early morning from Edinburgh. "I'm having trouble flying into London,"  she says.
<br>
I'm still waking up -- I didn't see the news.  I ask, "When can you come home?"

<p>"I don't know," she says, her voice unsteady, "They're still clearing the bodies."</blockquote></p>

<p>Three years ago Your Business Blogger(R) sent the <a href="http://charmaineyoest.com/2006/02/keeping_the_little_woman_out_o.php">Little Woman</a> to the G-8 with the B3: Bono and Branson and Bush.  </p>

<p>We here in the  US of A have not been attacked on our soil since 9.11.  We must be doing something right.  </p>

<p>Bush must be doing something right.  Would Obama be able to protect us as Bush has?  As McCain would?</p>

<p><span class="floatimgleft"> <img alt="charmaine_richard_branson.jpg" src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/archives/charmaine_richard_branson.jpg" width="324" height="237" /</br><br />
<strong>Charmaine on the plane with Richard Branson</strong></span><br />
</br>  Following is an edited cross post from  <em><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/">Reasoned Audacity</a></em>, July 1 - 7, 2005.</p>

<p>Charmaine calls early morning from Edinburgh. "I'm having trouble flying into London,"  she says.  </p>

<p>I'm still waking up.  I ask, "When can you come home?"</p>

<p>"I don't know," she says, her voice unsteady, "They're still clearing the bodies."</p>

<p>A wake up call.  </p>

<p>London, welcome to the war.</p>

<p>It started, as most things these days do, with <em>Powerline</em>.  </p>

<p>Following is original posting from London as Charmaine called it into me, when her site went down.  Any inconsistencies may be due to transcription overload.<br />
  <br />
<blockquote>This is Jack, the husband: Charmaine called.  Her site is still down, but she wanted to file a report to <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/010962.php">Powerline</a>.</p>

<p>"Flew into Heathrow airport and took a $150 cab ride into north London to conduct interviews and document the bombsites. Bobbies cordoned off area around the sites sealing the scene of the explosions.  I got to within a block or so of Edgware Tube station entrance with Londoners sitting calmly, relaxing in pubs.  Everything is strangely calm, business as usual.  I interviewed a woman, an interior designer, expecting some emotional display. There was none.  "We don't do a lot of group hugging in England," she said, making me think of the stiff-upper lip.  "We are not sentimental." </blockquote></p>

<p><span class="floatimgleft"><img alt="london_donotcrosstape.jpg" src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/archives/london_donotcrosstape.jpg" width="350" height="176" /></span>  <blockquote>And she seemed to reflect the mood of the London population.  Not for what they were doing but for what they were not doing: No candles, no out-pouring of grief, no hoards of gawkers milling around police tape, no teddy bears, no bouquets of flowers.  No movement. No tears. Everything normal, except, maybe for that bus with the top blown off.  Workers cleared and cleaned up the area real well. Spiffy. And got back to their pints.  </p>

<p>I visited hospitals and learned that 'only' 37 were confirmed dead at that time. More confirmations were expected.</p>

<p>There were no moms with little children in downtown London.  I interviewed middle-aged businessmen on cell phones and kids with Mohawks, none who were surprised.</p>

<p>Londoners gently reproached me about my concern over the bloodshed, "You Americans get sentimental over silly things. We're used to getting bombed."  The IRA Troubles had hardened hearts as well as the London infrastructure.</p>

<p>I expected some grief, at least as much as there was when Lady Di died.  And grief I got.  I interviewed three very ordinary, normal teenaged English Muslims, one with short spiky hair (dressed not unlike my 10 year-old-dude). All three seems to be parroting Muslim talking points. "The bombings were a conspiracy by Blair to generate support for the war," they recited in a charming British accent.</p>

<p>The bombers were quite indiscriminate.  Edgware is not far from the heart of Little Beirut, a Muslim ethnic neighborhood.</p>

<p>A young British black woman told me, "The bombings are Tony Blair's fault --  they killed a 100,000 Iraqis -- and it's like a boomerang [coming back at the British]."   Most everyone I talked to believed that the British caused the bombing or had it coming.  </p>

<p>Of the dozen or so people I interviewed only white males in business attire expressed surprise that anyone would think the British were at fault in anyway. </p>

<p>But these gentlemen were the minority. Most felt that the Brits were complicit.  The people at London's ground zero were sounding like the "wobbly" Spanish after their train bombings.</p>

<p>The day is a cloudy, cold, rainy 7.7."</p>

<p>Charmaine is still out on the streets -- 9pm local London time and will be sending pictures soon.</blockquote></p>

<p>Read the entire story at <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/07/my_wife_flew_off_with_bono_and.php">My Wife Flew off with Bono and Branson; Bombed in London 7.7.05</a> .</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/london_bombings_july_7_2005_th.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/london_bombings_july_7_2005_th.php</guid>
         <category>Leadership</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:54:32 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Obama vs McCain Live-Birth Abortion Matrix</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>"Let all the babies be born. Then let us drown those we do not like." <br />
<a href="http://www.chesterton.org/discover/quotations.html">Babies and Distributism, GK's Weekly, 11/12/32</a></p>

<p>Where do Obama and McCain stand on abortion and 'live birth' abortion?<br />
<blockquote><big><br />
Position/<br />
Candidate........Sonogram of baby......Picture of baby</big></blockquote></p>

<center><img alt="sonogram_side_by_side.jpg" src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/uploads/sonogram_side_by_side.jpg" width="250" height="205" /></center>

<blockquote><big>Pro-Life ......................Live ...................Live

<p></br><br />
Pro-Choice .................Die ....................Live<br />
</br><br />
McCain .......................Live ...................Live<br />
</br><br />
Obama .......................Die ....................Die</big></blockquote></p>

<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>The Obama Abortion Live-Birth Matrix</strong></div>
<br>
</br>

<p>Obama is the full-service abortion candidate.</p>

<blockquote>Abortion from conception to birth
<br>
Abortion at partial birth
<br>
Abortion after birth</blockquote>

<p>Obama aggressively demands that some babies born alive be left to die.  Obama does not support any Born Alive Infant Legislation. Amanda B. Carpenter writes in Human Events, <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18647#continueA">Obama More Pro-Choice Than NARAL</a> where Obama spoke out against the legislation similar to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act,<br />
<blockquote>Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) portrays himself as a thoughtful Democrat who carefully considers both sides of controversial issues, but his radical stance on abortion puts him further left on that issue than even NARAL Pro-Choice America.<br />
</br><br />
In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote.<br />
</br><br />
Both the Illinois and the federal bill sought equal treatment for babies who survived premature inducement for the purpose of abortion and wanted babies who were born prematurely and given live-saving medical attention.</blockquote></p>

<p>Here is what Obama has said about abortion and judges he would appoint,</p>

<blockquote>Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, it's never been more important to protect a woman's right to choose.  Last year, the Supreme Court decided by a vote of 5-4 to uphold the Federal Abortion Ban, and in doing so undermined an important principle of Roe v. Wade: that we must always protect women's health. 

<p><br />
With one more vacancy on the Supreme Court, we could be looking at a majority hostile to a women's fundamental right to choose for the first time since Roe v. Wade.  The next president may be asked to nominate that Supreme Court justice.  That is what is at stake in this election.</p>

<p><br><br />
</br><br />
Throughout my career, I've been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100% pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America.</p>

<p><br><br />
</br><br />
When South Dakota passed a law banning all abortions in a direct effort to have Roe overruled, I was the only candidate for President to raise money to help the citizens of South Dakota repeal that law.<br />
  <br />
<br><br />
</br><br />
When anti-choice protesters blocked the opening of an Illinois Planned Parenthood clinic in a community where affordable health care is in short supply, I was the only candidate for President who spoke out against it.  And I will continue to defend this right by passing the Freedom of Choice Act as president."</blockquote></p>

<p>Obama is not the candidate of change.  </p>

<p>Charmaine says, "It's all about women's perceived power -- the power a woman has over her fate, her future, her convenience."  </p>

<p>The mother-feminist even wants control of life and death: The ultimate power.  </p>

<p>The power-hungry feminist does not choose life for her baby.  The pro-choice, abortion-option movement is the desire to have the power of life and death."</p>

<p>Obama believes that feminist <strong>power </strong>over the baby is more important than the life of the <strong>baby</strong>.  </p>

<p>Obama claims to support a women's health, but what he is demanding is the women's power over life and death.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_no_life_yes.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_no_life_yes.php','popup','width=210,height=187,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_no_life_yes-thumb-200x178.jpg" width="200" height="178" alt="obama_no_life_yes.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span></p>

<center>###</center>

<p>Thank you (foot)notes:</p>

<p>Gary Bauer pointed us to the Obama speech.</p>

<p>Tom McMahon may not the originator of the 2 X 2 matrix, but no one does them better.  Enjoy his intellectual property at the <a href="http://www.4-blockworld.com/2008/06/the-compassiona.html ">4-Blockworld</a>.  Free!  It takes hard work to make complicated subjects so simple. <a href="http://www.tommcmahon.net/">Bookmark him</a>.</p>

<p>Tom provides us perhaps the real reason <a href="http://www.4-blockworld.com/2008/05/using-2004-stan.html">women will vote for John McCain</a>:   <em>Who can keep us safe in our current war?</em></p>

<p>A <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/nat4011.html">New Report Indicates Voters Most Interested in Barack Obama's Position on Abortion</a><br />
<blockquote>The Internet traffic monitoring firm HitWise indicates abortion is now the number one political issue voters are looking for when they conduct a search on Obama's campaign web site.</blockquote><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121504517357224911.html?mod=djemITP">Obama Should Embrace His [Pro-Life] Muslim Heritage</a>,<br />
<blockquote>As a great leader, Mr. Obama should take a principled stand on the issue of Muslims and Islamophobia. While anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. is substantial, it is not an insurmountable challenge.</p>

<p>The vast majority of Americans are sincere and open-minded; anti-Muslim sentiments are a product of fear and lack of understanding. These sentiments can be overcome.</blockquote></p>

<p>From an article in the <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> by Mr. Junaid M. Afeef, director of public and government Affairs at the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/obama_vs_mccain_abortion_matri.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/obama_vs_mccain_abortion_matri.php</guid>
         <category>Abortion</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:01:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Media Alert: Penta-Posse at Presser; Repeal NEA Resolution I - 15</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>"It is something you only want to do once," said Gary Bauer.</p>

<p>"What's that?" I ask. "Running for president?"</p>

<p>"No," he says.  "Falling backwards off the platform."</p>

<p>Alert Readers will well remember Gary Bauer falling off the podium while flipping flapjacks on his run for president.  It was funny and no one got hurt. </p>

<p>Except, maybe, his chances for president...</p>

<p>The Baby-Boo, the caboose on the Penta-Posse, made a similar slip and fell off the elevated platform at a press conference today.</p>

<p>Falling is something everyone has to do.  Baby-Boo has got his 'falling' out of the way -- and is now ready to run without a slip for president.</p>

<p>Baby-Boo may not be 35 years old, but, then, he's not <em>that </em>much younger than Obama. </p>

<p>Gary Bauer still laughs about his tumble and the uncertainly all presidential campaigns generate on the trail.  Gary is a class act.  (Your Business Blogger(R) would still be mad and a-blaming someone...)</p>

<p>Watch Baby-Boo's fall and his quick recovery.  Click <a href="http://www.frc.org/press/nea-press-conference">here for the Family Research Council site</a> and then click on Judy Bruns's talk.</p>

<p>Pictured behind Judy Brun is Baby-Boo, The Dude and The Diva.</p>

<p>Incidentally, Judy's speech is terrific on the meaning of words.</p>

<p>Following is The Diva's YouTube of her pro-life encounter with teachers at her school.  See <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/05/prolife_student_forced_to_remo.php">Pro-Life Student Forced to Remove Abortion T-Shirt</a>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/media_alert_pentaposse_at_pres.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/media_alert_pentaposse_at_pres.php</guid>
         <category>Abortion</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:53:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>MEDIA ALERT:  Charmaine Quoted in  CNN On Obama&apos;s &apos;Christian Left&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_yoest_cnn_headline_abortion_card.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_yoest_cnn_headline_abortion_card.php','popup','width=250,height=189,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_yoest_cnn_headline_abortion_card-thumb-200x151.jpg" width="200" height="151" alt="charmaine_yoest_cnn_headline_abortion_card.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>Charmaine is quoted in <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/01/obama.evangelicals/">Obama works to mobilize 'Christian left.'</a></p>

<p>She says that all voters should care, "...[A]bout the public policies the person is going to put in place."</p>

<p><strong>Charmaine is pictured at left on an earlier <em>CNN </em>appearance debating abortion. </strong></p>

<p>The policies of which Charmaine speaks are the 'vote-changing' issues Grover Norquist writes about in his book <em>Leave Us Alone</em>: Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives. </p>

<p>The Leave Us Alone coalition is made up of groups who want the government to do only constitutionally-restricted work, and to, well, leave us alone.</p>

<p>Following is a short list of loose associations Norquist cites who want less government and less outside intrusion:</p>

<blockquote>Homeschoolers</br>
Gun Owners</br>
Church-goers</br>
Taxpayers</br>
Pro-Lifers</blockquote>

<p>The Alert Reader will note that this conservative Leave Us Alone coalition includes the Pro-Life community.  This is the only group in Grover's group that wants the government and the courts to protect life and stop the option of killing of unborn children -- just as the government stopped the option of slavery.</p>

<p>The Christian Left is willing to sacrifice freedom in order to pay higher taxes -- this small segment that occasionally attends church is delighted with large government and the government confiscation of property, life and wealth.  </p>

<p>These young Christians are confusing government with God -- remember, for most liberals, the government is their god.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side.php','popup','width=250,height=205,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/sonogram_side_by_side-thumb-200x164.jpg" width="200" height="164" alt="sonogram_side_by_side.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>The Leftist group is a bit confused on Biblical teaching and looks forward to the tyranny of a ObamaNation.  Mature followers of Jesus Christ look to the Ten Commandments, including the directive, <em>Do Not Kill</em>, or more accurately, <em>Do No Murder</em>.  </p>

<p>The deliberate taking of innocent life is a vote-changer for thinking Christians.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/media_alert_chamaine_quoted_in_2.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/07/media_alert_chamaine_quoted_in_2.php</guid>
         <category>Presidential Race</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:11:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>MEDIA ALERT:  Charmaine On CNN: Obama and the Evangelical Vote</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_barney_frank_ethics_in_america_yoest.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_barney_frank_ethics_in_america_yoest.php','popup','width=2304,height=1728,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/charmaine_barney_frank_ethics_in_america_yoest-thumb-200x150.jpg" width="200" height="150" alt="charmaine_barney_frank_ethics_in_america_yoest.JPG" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span>Charmaine is taping an interview for <em><a href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/american.morning/">CNN American Morning</a></em> on the Senator Barack Obama flirtation with Bible believing, Jesus loving, Evangelicals who hold for the Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.</p>

<p><strong>Charmaine Yoest, Ph.D. is pictured at left during a taping of <a href="http://www.learner.org/series/ethics2/brother_keeper/participants.html">Ethics in America</a> with Barney Frank(D).</strong></p>

<p>Obama has a chance with some church goers.  About 30% of self-identified Christians voted for Bill Clinton.</p>

<p>Obama believes reporter Michael Weisskopf who wrote that members of the Christian Right are, "<a href="http://www.nationalcenter.org/2005/07/poor-uneducated-and-easy-to-command.html">largely poor, uneducated, and easy to command</a>."</p>

<p>So while the poor impoverished are clinging to guns and religion, how would the elitist Obama lead the nation?  </p>

<p>1) Bring legislation forcing citizens to embrace homosexual demands:  Homosexual Marriage and the Homosexuals in the military.</p>

<p>2) Raise taxes.</p>

<p>3) Raise gas prices by punishing oil companies. He refuses to explore and drill for energy.</p>

<p>4) Demand that some babies born alive be left to die.</p>

<p>5)  Force citizens how and what to think.  <a href="http://steynian.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/steynianism-173/">Mark Steyn is being sued</a> under hate-crimes law in Canada for his writing about Islam in <em>America Alone</em>, a must read.  Barack X. Obama supports this mind-thought control through legislation.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will force churches and the Boy Scouts to hire Homosexuals.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will force government-controlled doctors on the country.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will place women in land combat and in submarines.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will take more of the citizen's money in taxes and fees.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will force these government doctors to perform abortions.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will force babies born during a botched abortion (re: live birth) to die.</p>

<p>The ObamaNation will continue the <a href="http://www.prolifenews.tv/index.php/article/video_defund_planned_parenthood/">African-American genocide</a> thru Planned Parenhood.</p>

<p>The clip will air next week.  Hit times will be announced.  Please let us know what you think.  Comments are now open.</p>

<center>###</center>

<p>Thank you (foot)notes,</p>

<p>Obama may be a disciple of Jesus Christ, but he doesn't understand the Bible.  And after attending Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years, it figures.  For example, the Old Testament dietary restrictions no longer apply.  This is a "new" teaching in the New Testament that is different from the Old.  Obama is going to be confused about these <a href="http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/obamas-radical-misunderstanding-of-bible-parallels-radical-misunderstanding-of-constitution/">Old and New Testament issues</a>:<br />
 <br />
<blockquote>Dietary restrictions.<br />
Circumcision.<br />
Animal sacrifice.</blockquote></p>

<p>Homosexual abominations remain in effect.</p>

<p>Obama is fuzzy on his Biblical interpretations.  And a bit confused on secular matters -- but he is consistent with the old-style liberal world view. </p>

<p>Your Business Blogger(R) looks forward to the continuing debate between Obama and Dr. Dobson of Focus on the Family.  </p>

<p>Obama might come to Jesus yet...</p>

<p>Voters will not answer the ObamaNation <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altar_call">altar call,</a> Lord willing. </p>

<p>Click here for more on <a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2006/02/taping_for_the_fred_friendly_s.php">Ethics in America</a>.</p>

<p>Larry Cirignano sends us this article by <a href="http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/32844.html">Bishop Harry Jackson on Planned Parenhood</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/media_alert_charmaine_on_cnn_o.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/media_alert_charmaine_on_cnn_o.php</guid>
         <category>Media</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:09:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What is the Preamble for Your State?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em>BLESSED IS THE NATION WHOSE GOD IS THE LORD</em>, PSALM 33:12 </p>

<p>Your Business Blogger(R) is rather clever at discerning patterns.  But I missed this one:</p>

<p>Each of the 50 states (<a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/09/obama-wants-to-be-president-of-57-states/">57 if you're voting for Obama)</a> mentions the Creator in the opening of their governing document.<br />
 <br />
<strong>Alabama</strong> 1901, Preamble We the people of the State of Alabama, invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution.. </p>

<p><strong>Alaska </strong>1956, Preamble We, the people of Alaska, grateful to God and to those who founded our nation and pioneered this great land. </p>

<p><strong>Arizona </strong>1911, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution... </p>

<p><strong>Arkansas </strong>1874, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arkansas, grateful to Almighty God for the privilege of choosing our own form of government... </p>

<p><strong>California </strong>1879, Preamble We, the People of the State of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom... </p>

<p>[California!]</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/what_is_the_preamble_for_your.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/what_is_the_preamble_for_your.php</guid>
         <category>politics</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:49:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Obama: When Does Life Begin?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A question for Obama: If fatherhood begins at conception, when does the baby become the father's child?</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OCm8a5e47Kw&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OCm8a5e47Kw&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>Abortion should be debated.  Obama needs to tell us when he thinks Life begins and when does the baby have the right to life as stated in our <a href="http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration.html">Declaration of Independence</a>,</p>

<blockquote>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.</blockquote>

<p><em>Unalienable </em>means that the Right cannot be given nor taken away: Rights are endowed by our Creator, not government.</p>

<p>There is no right to slavery; there is no right for abortion.</p>

<p>It is the Right to Life.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/obama_when_does_life_begin.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/obama_when_does_life_begin.php</guid>
         <category>Abortion</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:37:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Obama: Abortion &amp; The Death of a Live Birth</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/fetusat18weeks.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/fetusat18weeks.php','popup','width=289,height=295,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/fetusat18weeks-thumb-100x102.jpg" width="100" height="102" alt="fetusat18weeks.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></span><big>"Let all the babies be born. </p>

<p>Then let us drown those we do not like."</big></p>

<p> <a href="http://www.chesterton.org/discover/quotations.html">GK Chesterton, Babies and Distributism, GK's Weekly, 11/12/32</a></p>

<p>GK Chesterton writes a prophesy:  He sees evil and wants it to stop --  </p>

<p>Barack Obama writes a policy:  He sees no evil and wants it to continue.</p>

<p>Obama is the full-spectrum abortion candidate.</p>

<p>Abortion thru nine months<br />
Abortion at birth<br />
Abortion after birth</p>

<p>Obama demands that some babies <a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/06/american_people.html">born alive be left to die</a>.</p>

<p>Obama makes clear what he will do about the killing of babies -- born and pre-born,</p>

<blockquote>"Thirty-five years after the Supreme Court decided <em>Roe v. Wade</em>, it's never been more important to protect a woman's right to choose.  Last year, the Supreme Court decided by a vote of 5-4 to uphold the Federal Abortion Ban, and in doing so undermined an important principle of <em>Roe v. Wade</em>: that we must always protect women's health.
<br>

<p></br><br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.christianshirts.net/designs.php?id=253"><a href="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_wiping_out_America_one_baby.php" onclick="window.open('http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_wiping_out_America_one_baby.php','popup','width=250,height=250,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.charmaineyoest.com/obama_wiping_out_America_one_baby-thumb-100x100.jpg" width="100" height="100" alt="obama_wiping_out_America_one_baby.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a></a></span>"With one more vacancy on the Supreme Court, we could be looking at a majority hostile to a women's fundamental right to choose for the first time since <em>Roe v. Wade</em>.  The next president may be asked to nominate that Supreme Court justice.  That is what is at stake in this election.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/barack_obama_promises_abortion_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/barack_obama_promises_abortion_1.php</guid>
         <category>Abortion</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:05:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bush Hoax Resignation Speech</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The following has been circulating on the web and deserves a wide audience.  Please comment if the author is known.  The writer should be acknowledged and acclaimed.</p>

<p>BUSH'S RESIGNATION SPEECH </p>

<p>The following 'speech' was written recently by an ordinary Maineiac [a resident of the People's Republic of Maine ]. While satirical in nature, all satire must have a basis in fact to be effective. This is an excellent piece by a person who does not write for a living. </p>

<p>The speech George W. Bush might give: </p>

<p>Normally, I start these things out by saying 'My Fellow Americans.' </p>

<p>Not doing it this time. If the polls are any indication, I don't know who more than half of you are anymore. I do know something terrible has happened, and that many of you are really not fellow Americans any longer. </p>

<p>I'll cut right to the chase here: I quit. Now before anyone gets all in a lather about me quitting to avoid impeachment, or to avoid prosecution or something, let me assure you: There's been no breaking of laws or impeachable offenses in this office. </p>

<p>The reason I'm quitting is simple. I'm fed up with you people. I'm fed up because you have no understanding of what's really going on in the world. Or of what's going on in this once-great nation of ours. And the majority of you are too d@mned lazy to do your homework and figure it out. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/bush_hoax_resignation_speech.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.charmaineyoest.com/2008/06/bush_hoax_resignation_speech.php</guid>
         <category>Presidential Race</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:39:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
